READY NETWORK WITH SGT. AL USMC: Ready Emergency List!

As we watch the socialist democrats get crazier and crazier, we need to be prepared. Over the next several days I will post various ideas to protect yourself and family. Subjects, water, food, and a list of the minimum you need to handle a disaster.

In the meantime, take a few moments to go to my Ready Network store and see that we can supply most of what you need to purchase that you might not already have in your home. Our prices, even at retail, beat all the competition. If you join my Ready Network team I can show you how to save even more, and steer you into creating your own side-income. Check out www.prepstore.com/battista

Ready Network can supply everything but guns, and on a very limited basis, we can refer you to a gunsmith with the legal steps to acquire weapons. However, I do not recommend buying guns unless you will take the time to learn how to use them properly!

 

EPX180-BATTISTA·SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2018

1- 3 day supply of food: Ready Network dehydrated food; other non-perishable ideas are peanut butter; canned fish; dried fruit and nuts!

2-Whistle to signal your team or call for help. Compass for orientation!

3-Flashlight. If you use Ready Network Grab and Go pack all illumination is solar charged, but you may want to also keep a few batteries of various sizes!

4-Cell phone with solar charger

5-Solar powered radio!

6-First Aid kits! Poison extractors and medicines to be discussed more in depth later!

7-Water purifying systems!

8-As much bottled water as you can carry. You’ll need at least 1 gallon per person per day for drinking and cleanliness! Our Grab and Go pack contains 3 water purification systems!

9-Fire extinguishers!

10-Can openers!

11-Paper towels and toilet paper!

12-Moist towelettes, garbage bags, and plastic ties! A digging shovel for sanitation!

13-Sleeping bags and or blankets for everyone in your party!

14-3 changes of clothing and underwear! An extra pair of shoes and extra socks.

15-Feminine hygiene products!

16-Infant supplies!

17-Matches. Keep in waterproof containers. Strong wind lighters and matches are very useful!

18-Emergency tools such as hatchet, hammer, wrenches, pliers and light chains that will saw wood.

19-Respirators, dust mask, plastic sheeting and duct tape to filter contaminated air!

20-Soap, toothbrushes and toothpaste. Any item used for hygiene not listed that you need!

21-Copies of important documents such as insurance documents, deeds, ID’s, bank records, birth certificates and passports! Keep in waterproof, portable containers that you may find at our www.readynetwork.com/battista store! Local maps are also useful! Reference material about medicine, first aid, and survival hints such as found in our Ready Network grab an go pack!

22-Travelers checks may not be useful in every emergency! Carry cash, silver coins and gram size gold! Remember, an ounce of gold is too much for a tank of gas or a meal!

23-Household chlorine bleach. Do not use scented, color safe or bleach with additional cleaners! With a medicine dropper you can make disinfectant with 9 parts water and one part bleach. Chlorine can also help treat water for drinking with 16 to 20 drops per gallon of water!

24-Don’t forget fun things for children and your pets food and water. Pencil and paper are useful. Ink runs when wet so have plenty of pencils.

Most of these items are easily available at your local market. Many of the other items are contained in the Ready Network Grab and Go pack! Ready Network has a full array of survival and camping items from solar generators to food; heirloom seeds to silver and gold; nutritionally infused coffee to tools, water purification tools, virtually everything necessary to have an enjoyable camping trip or to survive the most horrific situations!

OUR NEXT BLOG WILL FEATURE MEDICINE YOU SHOULD HAVE OR CAN MAKE!

WHO’S DRAWING FIRST BLOOD IN THE CIVIL WAR OF 2018?

“…mainstream right is a bit different. It’s not as well organized, for a start. The vast majority of right-of-center Americans aren’t actually very interested in politics, because they’re focused on work and family. When right-wingers do get annoyed about a political issue they’re less likely to do anything about it, for the same reason – they’re busy getting on with their lives. On the other hand, if they do get pushed hard enough that they decide to take action, they’re a lot more capable of creating some serious unrest. A lot of that is down to the simple fact that the right has more guns than the left, and tend to know how to use them.”

Editor’s Note: This article is written by Giurgi C. and does not necessarily reflect this website’s options and beliefs, but it portrays some scenarios that are likely to happen.

Prepping is a safeguard against a whole range of possible scenarios, and everyone has their own opinions about what’s most likely to happen and what would be the biggest threat. There’s one thing pretty much everyone can agree on, though, and that’s that widespread civil unrest is going to bring on a social collapse, at least in the affected areas and maybe right across the country.

Who’s likely to cause this civil unrest, though? Does anyone have the ability to throw large parts of the USA into chaos? We’ve all seen often enough how local issues can spark unrest in a neighborhood or even a small city, but could the same happen on the scale of a county, a state, the whole Midwest or Atlantic seaboard?

Yes it could, and the most likely way it’s going to happen is that some incident upsets politically active people – not just in the town where it happens, but across the state or the country – so much they decide enough is enough, and try to bring about a radical change. That’s happened hundreds of times throughout history, in all sorts of countries – and while the USA is unique in many ways, it’s not unique enough to be immune from the threat of mass civil unrest.

Experts don’t argue about whether unrest could happen in the USA. It could; that’s a done deal. What they do argue about is where it’s most likely to come from. Any part of the political spectrum can be pushed into rebellion but for that to happen to the majority who’re pretty much in the center, things really have to be bad. More usually, when unrest happens it comes from either the right or left. It doesn’t always come from people who could be labeled as extremists either – often it’s people who’re identifiable to one side of center, but not particularly hard line.

Left or Right: Who Wants to Fight?

Listen to anyone on the left and they’ll tell you that the biggest threat of civil unrest comes from heavily armed groups on the “far right” or “alt-right”. On the other hand, speak to anyone on the right and they will say that the real danger is the organized and violent flash mobs of Antifa and other “far-left” groups. Are they both correct, or is one – even both – wrong?

There’s no doubt that left and right both have extremes who’re more than willing to use violence. There aren’t a lot of them on either side though, so it’s unlikely they could directly cause widespread civil unrest. What they might be able to do is cause enough trouble to provoke a backlash from the mainstream on the other side, and that really could become civil unrest.

Thanks to the media it’s right-wing extremists who get the most attention, but in fact, their numbers are very small. There are neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups in the USA, but most of them are tiny and too disorganized to cause any serious trouble. There have been lone wolf terrorists on the American far right, with Timothy McVeigh being the most notorious. They’re sometimes capable of committing serious atrocities, but mass civil unrest is beyond them.

Left-wing extremists are more numerous, unfortunately. The largest extreme left group in the USA right now is Antifa – but, with an estimated 15,000 hardcore members, even Antifa isn’t big enough to create civil unrest at a national level. Law enforcement could put down an Antifa uprising inside a couple of days. The far left might not like that, but it’s still a fact.

Related: America’s Vulnerability When it Comes to Internal Crises: US Now vs. US Then

The mainstream menace?

But what about the mainstream left – the tens of millions of Americans who see themselves as on the left of the spectrum, but reject extremist positions like Marxism? Could they reduce the country to chaos? Yes, they could.

Mainstream leftists don’t have the enthusiasm for violence that groups like Antifa are notorious for, but they do have an endless appetite for getting involved in causes. Any perceived “injustice”, from border control to employment policies, is likely to attract a horde of protesting lefties. Usually, nothing much happens beyond legitimate political protest, but sometimes things can get out of control.

If there’s a large protest movement, and its members feel they’re not being taken seriously, tempers can rise. If the people who’re getting angry are well enough organized this is where civil unrest can break out – and the problem is that large parts of the left are very well organized. This end of the political spectrum is closely linked to labor unions and a large, interlocking network of pressure groups; they’re very good at spreading messages, exploiting social media and getting people mobilized.

Many on the left also don’t have a lot of respect for the society we live in. They would like to see it “reformed” into something that fits their ideas better, and this attitude makes it easy for them to justify breaking the law. That’s why left-wing protests are prone to violence and looting; if everything you see around you is a symbol of oppression and inequality, it’s tempting to lash out.

The mainstream right is a bit different. It’s nothing like as well organized, for a start. The vast majority of right-of-center Americans aren’t actually very interested in politics, because they’re focused on work and family. When right-wingers do get annoyed about a political issue they’re less likely to do anything about it, for the same reason – they’re busy getting on with their lives.

On the other hand, if the right does get pushed hard enough that they decide to take action, they’re a lot more capable of creating some serious unrest. A lot of that is down to the simple fact that the right has more guns than the left, and tend to know how to use them. Any large, heavily armed, combat-effective insurgency in the USA would pretty much have to come from the right; the left just doesn’t have many people with those sort of skills.

Related: Surviving Martial Law: What To Do If It Hits Your Town

Where’s the danger?

Both liberals and conservatives have the potential to create mass civil unrest if they decide they want to. That shouldn’t be a surprise; people are people, whatever they believe, and while some belief systems seem to encourage violence in their followers any of us can be pushed to rebellion by the right factors.

If conservatives rose up that would be more disruptive, and more dangerous to the government. Firstly, conservatives are more heavily armed; secondly, they have an inbuilt respect for law and order, so for them to start overthrowing society they have to be very angry.

Realistically, though, the political left is the main threat when it comes to civil unrest. They’re organized, they get upset easily and there are a lot of them. Most unrest in western countries is caused by leftist groups, and the USA Is just as vulnerable as anywhere else. Our citizens might be better armed to protect themselves, but mass action by the left could still tear society apart in a hurry. If that happens, all the systems we rely on in everyday life will soon fall apart across the whole area affected by the disorder – and, unless you’re prepared for that, you’re in for a pretty hard time.

 

You may also like:

Get prepared with Ready Network: 

EXCEPT FOR FOOD, OUR ‘GRAB AND GO’ PACK WILL KEEP YOUR FAMILY SAFE!

COMMUNICATIONS, WATER PURIFICATION, EVERYTHING NEEDED TO START OVER!

NO NEED TO CARRY BATTERIES! ALL EQUIPMENT NEEDING POWER IS SOLAR POWERED!

ALSO AVAILABLE, BUT NOT IN THE PACK, WE SUPPLY EVERYTHING FROM SILVER

TO  SEEDS; NUTRITIONAL COFFEE TO JUST ABOUT ANYTHING A SMALL COMMUNITY

WOULD NEED TO START OVER, AGAIN!

VISIT THE ON-LINE STORE AT

WWW.PREPSTORE.COM/BATTISTA

Albert Einstein Feared Zuckerberg!

Subject: The day that Albert Einstein feared has arrived!
 

 

 

 

 

 TOO MAKE MATTERS WORSE, LIBERALS RUNNING THESE SOCIAL NETWORKS ARE HELPING THE GLOBALISTS TO DESTROY THE USA!

Zuckerberg Obfuscates on Helping Obama Harvest Your Data

Apr 12, 2018

 

RUSH: Oh! You know, we’ve played the sound bites here a couple or three times here, Carol — Carol — whatever. The Obama tech wizardette who claims that she succeeded in getting every Facebook user for the Obama campaign in 2012. And the New York Times wrote two or three stories about the geniuses in the Obama high-tech team that did this. And she is now adding to it. She said, “Yeah, not only did we get users, we got the entire social graph.” Do you know what the social graph is? (interruption)

You don’t. Okay, well, let me tell you what the social graph is, ’cause I guarantee you there isn’t a senator up there that knows what it is, either. When you say, as this Carol whatever her last name is… Robertson? That’s not what it is, but whenever you hear her say that they got the social graph, the whole social graph, that means they got every user and every user’s known friends. That’s what the social graph is.

The social graph is not just Hoovering up the data of every user. It’s also Hoovering up the data of every friend that every user has. And she’s out there bragging that they pulled this off. Well, yesterday I think Zuckerberg denied this. You know, she’s saying that Facebook found out about it, because, after the election, Facebook came to the Obama high-tech team and started recruiting. They wanted to find people they could hire, ’cause the Obama tech team was filled with a bunch of geniuses. The New York Times said so.

And the Facebook team shows up and this Obama high-tech babe, Carol, says, “Yeah, they came in and they tried to hire and they marveled at what we had done — and they didn’t stop us because they said they were ‘on our side,’” meaning Facebook was for Obama in 2012. Of course, no mystery about that. I think Zuckerberg tried to deny this yesterday. “Nah-nah-nah-nah. That didn’t happen. We’re not on anybody’s side,” and so forth and so on. I think it…

Maybe it was Steve Scalise had brought it up, but it took two days for this example to even be brought up and asked of Zuckerberg. To me, it’s question No. 1. You got the Obama tech team wizardette bragging that they were able to suck up every user’s data in the 2012 campaign and utilize it for targeted advertising and voter outreach and what have you. The New York Times is writing stories on what a bunch of geniuses these people are and what a genius Obama is for hiring them.

To me, that’s question No. 1. But we’re talking about user privacy and user agreements and so forth. And it’s rooted, I think, in a lack of understanding on the part of elected officials about the tech itself. I’m not talking about Facebook policy but rather just the technological things that make it all possible. For example, Zuckerberg was repeatedly asked why Facebook cannot prevent hate speech and why can’t Facebook identify and deny service to hate groups. Now, you want to talk about bizarre.

You know, hate speech and hate groups to me are as specious as the concept of a hate crime. Let’s say you go out there and you murder somebody. Okay. We’ve got laws saying you can’t do it — and if you do it with premeditation, you’re going to jail, probably for life. You might even get the electric chair. But now we’ve added to it, that if you hated the person you killed because you’re a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe then we can really lower the boom on you.

Purely politics. Hate crime? That’s nothing more than the left taking control of the language and trying to structure degrees of crime based on prejudice that they want to stamp out. Same with hate speech. Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook are somehow supposed to stop hate speech? And you have members of Congress asking why Facebook cannot prevent hate speech and hate groups?

There are billions of users on Facebook, and these senators want to know why Zuckerberg can’t prevent that kind of stuff? Okay. Turn it around. Why can’t the government prevent crime and hate in a country of a few hundred million people? I mean, why can’t you guys write laws that get rid of hate? If you want Zuckerberg or social media to get rid of it, why don’t you write laws yourselves and get rid of it? It can’t be done.

Because it’s a manufactured state of mind that is entirely subjective based on what a bunch of screwball liberals thinks. Hate crime, hate groups. It’s nothing more than a new form of censorship. Here come these members of Congress asking about it because they think that this is what the American people’s genuine concerns are because they think that the Drive-By Media is representing a majority of people’s opinions in this country, which isn’t the case, as you know.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Here’s Steve Scalise yesterday talking to Zuckerberg about Carol Davidsen bragging about all the stuff they got from Facebook for Obama.

SCALISE: In 2008 and 2012, there was also a lot of this done. One of the lead digital — or heads of the Obama campaign said recently, “Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing. They came to office in the days following election recruiting and were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.” That’s a direct quote from one of the heads of the Obama digital team. What would she mean by “they,” Facebook, “were on our side”?

ZUCKERBERG: Congressman, we didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn’t have otherwise been able to do.

SCALISE: So she was making an inaccurate statement, in your point of view?

ZUCKERBERG: Yes.

RUSH: Special treatment’s not what this is! He obfuscated the answer there. Hang on.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, Steve Scalise is the member of Congress who just asked Zuckerberg the question about Carol Davidsen bragging that they were able to get everybody, everybody and their friends on the Obama campaign for data mining to pair up advertising and other manipulative suggestive things to get people to vote for Obama, just like the so-called Russians did for Trump. Everybody does. The Russians were pikers at it, by the way, but I don’t want to distract myself here.

Steve Scalise is the Republican who was shot by a deranged leftist during baseball practice for an upcoming game between Democrats and Republicans in the House of Representatives. The guy who pulled the trigger, the guy who was trying to kill Republican members of Congress had a long list of leftist hate groups on his Facebook page that he was recommending, that he was suggesting, that he was liking. And they are still there.

All of these hate groups that this clown that tried to kill Scalise and others, this deranged Democrat from Illinois, the hate groups, they’re still there. But we’re told there isn’t any hate on the left. No, no, no, no. The hate, the hate exists only on the right. The hate exists only in the Alt-Right. The hate only exists on Fox News. But on the left, there is nothing more than utopian love.

I’m sorry here, but I’ve gotta contradict Zuckerberg. These guys doing the questioning, I don’t think they are sufficiently informed on all of this. ‘Cause here, ladies and gentlemen is what happened. Zuckerberg said in this sound bite, “Congressman, we didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn’t have otherwise been able to do. No special treatment.”

Zuckerberg said, “The Obama campaign didn’t get anything that anybody else could get.” Well, that is the exact opposite of what Carol Davidsen said. She’s the Obama tech wizardette. She said the GOP did not have the access that Obama’s campaign did. And you know what else? She said that ultimately she didn’t think that was fair, but she did it anyway because all’s fair in love and politics.

But she pointed out — and we’ve played that aspect of her sound bite on previous programs — she says the GOP didn’t have the access that Obama’s campaign did. She said back in 2015 (paraphrasing), “The Republicans do not have that information and will not get that information. I’m a Democrat, so maybe I could argue that’s a great thing, but really it’s not in the overall process. That wasn’t thought all the way through and now there’s a disadvantage of information that to me seems unfair. But I’m not Facebook. And if the advantage extends to me in politics, I’m gonna take it.”

She’s making it perfectly clear that Facebook did facilitate what they were doing and that Facebook was on their side. And if she’s saying the Republicans didn’t get anything, didn’t have the access that Obama’s campaign did, what does that mean? If the Republicans didn’t have the access the Obama campaign did, then somebody at Facebook had to know it and okay the access for the Democrats, but to deny it elsewhere.

But Zuckerberg said (imitating Zuckerberg), “Oh, no, no, no. Congressman, we didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything.” The Obama campaign was heavily recruited. These wizards of smart in the Obama tech team were recruited. Facebook went and met with them at Obama campaign headquarters after the election.

So I thought that was probably one of the most important areas to explore with Zuckerberg. Rather than go at it generically with hate speech and fairness here and there, you’ve got an actual real-world example where the Obama high-tech titan is bragging about the advantage they had because Facebook knew what they were doing and was on their side. And, by the way, why deny that? Because everybody knows Facebook’s a bunch of leftists. Because everybody knows that Silicon Valley is a bunch of leftists.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I need to get back to the phones here. We’ve got somebody who thinks that I was wrong. That’s so rare, we put these guys to the top of the call roster. This one is Greg. He’s in Newport Beach, California. I’m so glad you called. How are you?

CALLER: Good. Thank you, Rush. Mark Zuckerberg’s answer to Steve Scalise about the access that Facebook gave the Republicans versus the Democrats? He actually answered correctly because what he had done… In Mark Zuckerberg’s answer, he compared the access that they gave to the Democrats as access that they gave to not Republicans, but to developers. As we all know, if you know anything about this, the developers have a completely different access level than, say, a third party, as in the Republicans. So they did give the Democrats and developers the exact same access. So he didn’t answer correctly… He didn’t answer untruthful, but he completely miscalculated or obfuscated and made it sound like they were giving exactly the same access, and his answer was, they did not. That’s all.

RUSH: Well, I must say the caller here is mostly correct, and the reason that he’s right is precisely because of his comments on the developer side, and I misread — therefore misinterpreted — what Carol Davidsen’s comments were. Let me… Greg, thanks for the call. You can listen to my ‘splanation here on the radio. She’s talking about the fact that they Hoovered up all of the Facebook user data and the social graph, and they do it as developers. She said, “That freaks Facebook out, right?”

She’s admitting Facebook was freaked out by what the Obama campaign did, but they didn’t shut it down while they were doing it. After they finished, after the campaign Facebook shuts off the feature, and she says that. So they shut off the feature. “Well, the Republicans never built an app to do what we did,” meaning the Republican developers did not write an app like the Obama developers wrote an app to Hoover all the data.

And her point is, she goes on to say that it wasn’t… She at times didn’t think it was fair, but so what? The Republicans could have written an app, but they didn’t. The Obama team did, and she said, “The Republicans do not have that information, and they won’t get that information,” and she says, “Now that’s a disadvantage of information that to me seems unfair, but I’m not Facebook, so this is the reality.”

And Zuckerberg was asked by Scalise if Facebook had favored the Obama campaign in this, and Zuckerberg said no special treatment. “We didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn’t have otherwise been able to do.” And technically, that is correct. His answer still makes it look like that they were siding with the Democrats. But I guess here the bottom line here is that Democrats had developers that wrote the app that Hoovered the data.

Facebook found out about it and didn’t stop them while they were doing it, which is why Carol Davidsen said the Facebook people showed up and said, “We didn’t stop you because you’re on our side.” Zuckerberg is denying that. But Carol Davidsen says, “No, the Facebook people showed up to recruit some of us after the campaign and they told us they didn’t shut us down because they were on our side.” The Republicans didn’t develop an app to soak up that data, and they weren’t told that the Democrats were doing it.

Zuckerberg’s point is, had the Republicans written an app, they could have. If they had a developer who wanted to write the app, suck data out of Facebook, they could have done it too. So we’re left here with the idea that the Obama campaign was simply smarter and once the Facebook people found out about it, they didn’t stop it. They shut off this ability of developers to write apps to Hoover Facebook data after the election, which mean they found out about it and let the Obama team do it.

And of course, they weren’t gonna tell the Republicans, “Hey, look what the Democrats are doing over here,” because they were on the Democrat side in all of it.

---

Related Links

• RushLimbaugh.com: Flashback: Obama Campaign Bragged About Ingesting Facebook Data – 03.20.18
• RushLimbaugh.com: Congress Clueless About Tech at Zuckerberg Hearings – 04.11.18
• Daily Signal: 10 Questions Mark Zuckerberg Should Answer When He Testifies Before Congress
• NewsBusters: Zuckerberg: Obama Staffer Lied About Alliance With Facebook
• art: Rep. Sca

Advertisement: The Democrats lost the last revolution that they attempted in the 1860’s!

Here we are 160 years later and they are attempting to create a Second Civil War!

Are you prepared to withstand the turmoil the Democrats are creating? Come get your supplies at our Preppers Survival store– https://prepstore.com/battista

THE NEXT BIG QUAKE! HOW MUCH OF CALIFORNIA WILL SLIDE INTO THE PACIFIC?

PLEASE note: NUKE Power Plants the real danger!!!

134 In One Week! Experts Warn This Could Be The Beginning Of The Big One

Some experts are convinced that a large quake, WHICH IS  expected could destroy the area FROM MONTEREY COUNTY TO LOS ANGELES.

WORSE YET,  a scenario can unfold which could see earthquakes causing nuclear deaths that far outweighs what would happen in the event of an actual nuclear exchange between two nations!  Fukushima, we know, had a meltdown in at least one unit caused by the earthquake, independent of the tidal wave that crippled the other reactors.

Still, when “a whopping 134 earthquakes within three miles of that 4.6 tremor were recorded”  last week, as the Daily Star confirms to be the case, not much is said. ARE THEY HIDING SOMETHING?

When “a series of 10 mini-earthquakes struck Monterey County in the US …” since last week, almost nothing is said about the threat to that power plant.

It is even reported that a “4.6 magnitude quake 13 miles northeast of Gonzales, along the San Andreas Fault” was recorded, the largest one so far. We are seeing a lot of activity. This means that, no matter how dire the quakes and aftermath may be, the death toll will be insignificant compared to what the ruptured nuclear power plants may unleash.

Those who have studied this worrisome activity say that a magnitude 7 earthquake or stronger is due to hit the area. These are many of the same prudent minds who were ignored as they warned that Fukushima was about to happen. Powerful names like Westinghouse and General Electric (TEPCO) are behind the reason the media is so awfully silent on such a dire matter.

Of the 134, “only 17 were stronger than a 2.5 magnitude and six greater than 3.0,” according to data compiled from the USGS.

Ole Kaven, a USGS seismologist, predicts aftershocks from this activity, too. “This one has been a quite productive aftershock sequence. We suspect there will be aftershocks in the 2 to 3 [magnitude] range for at least a few more weeks.” We have been on the lookout for smaller earthquakes, as well.

Regardless of what the nuclear industry likes to try and convey, we are ill-prepared for a strong quake and sadly, one seems due to hit the area. While these smaller shakers are not enough to cause a meltdown, these are but harbingers or whispers of what is to come. These can be thought of a banshee warning mankind of the violent shaking that is to occur.

This area is set to see a lot of rocking.

For over 150 years, terrible pressure has been accumulating on the San Andreas fault, and it is not even the only active fault line in the region. California has 300(!) active faults and Seismologist Lucy Jones of the US Geological Survey, says that San Andreas is the most threatening at the moment.

“When we have a big San Andreas earthquake it’ll be felt in Las Vegas and in Arizona. It may be felt in the Bay Area,” she warns. “The damage and death unleashed by an earthquake that size would be catastrophic.”

She envisions “more than 1,800 people would die, around 300,000 homes would be destroyed and £160billion ($213billion) in damages would be incurred,” yet that is child’s play compared to the real threat seen NOWHERE in the article.

How will any nuclear power station hold up as this happens beneath it?

It would take only one reactor to meltdown, melt out (explode from within), or melt through (to the water table) to be the end of American life as we define it. The authorities have already shown that they are more than willing to hide, downplay, and deny all data, so if a disaster happens, we WILL be lied to.

In no time at all, cancers, heart issues, blood traumas, and diseases too graphic to think about is so close to a turkey feast, will show the depth of their lie.

However, by then it will be far too late for that to matter.

Source: The Daily Star

Al Battista · 

Sales training at Ready Network

The author of the article needs some English/writing lessons, (tried to clean it up as much as possible) but the substance of the ARTICLE IS VITAL! If you live in California you need to check out our “Grab and Go Pack” at https://readynetwork.com/battista or go directly to our store at prepstore.com/battista

                                                                      

Product Description:

High-capacity 65 liter backpack made of ultra light and durable nylon fabric. In addition to the main bag, there are multiple pockets with zipper closures. Bag is contoured, and has adjustable padded shoulder straps. Adjustable belt straps accommodate a wide range of sizes. Sternum strap is also adjustable with built in emergency whistle buckle. Attached rain cover. Weighs approximately 28lbs.

Includes:

• Two-Way HAM Radio with NOAA   as well as,                                                      PUTTING THIS TOGETHER YOURSELF WOULD COST YOU $1,357.95
  • Fishing Survival Kit (on back order)
  • Two Gallon Water Container                                                                            YOUR RETAIL COST FROM US IS $799.95
  • Survival Whistle Combo                                                                                     GO TO https://prepstore.com/battista to order today!
  • Survival Guide
  • Zip Ties (Pack of 50)                                                                              Distributorships are available: Interested, leave voice mail or text us!
  • Camo Duct Tape                                                                                      928-925-8506 WE GET LOTS OF CALLS, BUT WILL CALL BACK ASAP!
  • Notepad & Pen
  • Playing Cards with Survival Tips
  • Utility Rope

  AND MUCH MORE:

• Water Filter Pump
• Water Filter Straw
• Water Filter Bottle
• Water Bladder 2L
• One-Person Tent
• Camping Mat
• Sleeping Bag
• Fire Starter
• Cooking Set (10 Pieces)
• Folding Silverware
• Hatchet and Skinning Knife Combo
• Power Bank Lantern
• Solar Folding Charger
• Solar Flashlight with Radio
• Cables 4 in 1 for charging devices
• First Aid Kit
• Shovel Folding
• Poncho
• Compass

 

Time to End All Obama Social Engineering Experiments!

Congress makes Stunning Decision on Trump’s Military Trans-Ban
By Constitution.com September 20, 2017

By Tony Perkins from the Family Research Council

When Congress sets records, they aren’t always good ones!

But yesterday, the Senate kept a good streak alive, passing the $700 billion National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the 56th consecutive year. In a Capitol where regular order is rarer than a solar eclipse, the military’s spending bill is one of the few things Congress manages to approve on time. It hasn’t missed since West Side Story was in the theaters, and gas cost 27 cents a gallon.

But if there was ever a year when the streak might have snapped, it was this one. Apart from the hike in spending, liberal senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) threatened to make a stink about the president’s transgender policy. Despite being three of the most favorited tweets Donald Trump has ever posted, this pair was desperate to keep Obama’s dangerous social experiment alive. In comments to the press, they defended the gender confusion that’s been panned by the service chiefs, troops, and American people.

Gillibrand argued that “Our military is strongest when it represents the nation it serves.” In the end, that’s exactly who the president represented — a country who elected him to ignore the distractions of the last eight years and focus on the job at hand. And, as dozens of military leaders pointed out, that job was nearly impossible with Obama’s social engineering dogging their every move. Taxpayers didn’t escape the weight of it either, staring down a $3.7 billion tabfor the next 10 years of transgender surgeries, treatments, and lost deployment time. In a force devastated by two terms of budget cuts, cultural shifts, suicide, sexual assaults, and recruitment woes, no one wanted to fling open the doors to more politically-correct chaos — least of all the men and women in uniform.

Asked point-blank, almost 60 percent of active-duty military held a negative opinion of the decision to allow transgender troops to serve openly. More telling, more than half of that group said the policy change was having a terrible effect on military morale. In other words, it was unpopular, unproductive, and unreasonably expensive. Is it any wonder that one year after Barack Obama changed the policy, Trump changed it back? Like most Americans, he understands that the military’s job is to fight and win wars – not pander to a political agenda that weakens national security.

Fortunately, the majority of GOP leaders arrived at the same conclusion, refusing to give the Gillibrand-Collins amendment a second glance.

That’s in large part to the thousands of you who heeded our call and urged your senators to support the president’s guidance. As a result, the NDAA sailed through the Senate 89-8 — without even debating a return to the demoralizing policy of the last year. Instead they focused on the military’s real priorities: increased pay, missile defense, better equipment, and more troops. And while the bill isn’t entirely out of the woods — the House and Senate still have to agree on the final package in conference — this is a huge step in the right direction.

Our deepest thanks to the White House and all of you, who refused to stop fighting for the people fighting for us.

Reposted with Permission from the Family Research Council.

TRUMP WAS LEFT WITH THE LARGEST PLETHORA OF STUPID SITUATIONS BY BARRY OBAMA! INSTEAD OF TAKING THE EASY ROAD, LETTING THIS IDIOCY SLIDE, TRUMP IS TAKING THEM ON-SLICING AND DICING THESE WASTEFUL AND UNPRODUCTIVE programs SO THEY WILL END UP IN THE ARID DUMP WITH THE REST OF THE SWAMP!

ADVERTISEMENT: DO YOU HAVE THE WILL TO SURVIVE? It is said SURVIVAL is the number one instinct in human beings. Could you help your family and the few neighbors around you survive if you had a Solar generator, up-to-date First Aid kit, five (5) water purification kits and a host of items designed to get you through any crisis?
JOIN OUR TEAM AND HAVE ACCESS TO ALL OF THIS AND MORE. Go to: https://readynetwork.com/battista

Love is Fair and Accurate! The Media is Unfair and Inaccurate!

Hi, I thought you might enjoy reading this article I just came across: “Not Just the Alt-Right: Leftist Violence was on Display in Charlottesville”;

This is the link: http:/constitution.com/not-just-alt-right-leftist-violence-display-charlottesville/

There was too much to say in this blog.  To see the article you will have to click the link!

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

READ THE ENTIRE BLOG, PLEASE. It will only take a few minutes unless you get stuck on the photos:

These 3 sick puppies know Donald Trump is our president! HOW COME THE HYPOCRITES IN THE MEDIA, cOMMUNIST pARTY, democrats, antifa, bLACK lIVES mATTER AND OTHER GROUPS ON THE LEFT, RINO rEPUBLICANS AND OTHER ASSORTED anti-TRUMPERS ARE STUCK ON STUPID refusing to believe crooked Hillary did not run a good campaign and Trump did, which is why Trump won!

Since winning Trump has been attacked from all sides: Of course that is expected from the democrats, but not expected so unfairly by the media, RINO republicans, Obama holdovers in the government and assorted anti-Trumpers from all angles!

During this turmoil it has been said, “The press is not our enemy!” Let’s examine that:

An enemy attempts to sow dissension, topple the leader the people elected. Webster says, “ENEMY:One seeking to injure, confound or overthrow another.”

The press has not published one positive comment about Trump since he won the election!  In fact, every comment is so falsely negative the majority of people that follow politics and the news are now ignoring the media. (Unfortunately too many people in our country avoid paying attention, so are easily lead into idiocy by a lying media.) Instead of a positive article we get a flood of attacks and negativity, mostly all fake news! They also ignore all the good news coming out of the Trump administration.

THERE ARE ALSO THE FAKE NEWS BY OMISSION:

In the face off with Korea it was Trump’s spine that was the WINNER!

A million new jobs in 6 months!

Unemployment down to 4.4%

Corprate Reinvestment:

SoftBank $50B
Exxon $20B
Hyundai $3.1B
Apple $1B
Chrysler $1B
GM $1B
Bayer AG $1B
Toyota $600M
LG $250M

Killed the TPP

Stock market around 20,200

Over 40 bills passed

Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court

Consumer confidence above 125

Diplomacy

Strengthening relationships
    China
    Japan
    Russia
    UK
Tough on North Korea
Tough on Syria
Freed Humanitarian Workers from Egypt

ALL THIS WITH RESISTANCE FROM DEMOCRATS, RINO REPUBLICANS AND ASSORTED OTHERS WISHING TO SEE THE USA COLLAPSE!!!

 

Meanwhile they ignore real dangers and crimes:

Of course they never mention, that before running for president, Donald Trump was the most appreciated white man in the Black community!

Just heard on Rush: More fake news, Mattis getting all the credit for making “Little Fat Un” back down on sending missiles towards Guam! Sure, I love Mad Dog Mattis but in this case it was Trump’s words that created the WIN!

There is so much more fake news attacks on Trump, decent people look at the MEDIA AS A REAL ENEMY, trying to tear down our elections and our nation!!!

President Trump was correct when he said “…evil on all sides…” which is noted if you take the time to study the videos of the Battle at Charlottesville; if you recognize the police (more evil) let the two groups get face to face, then stood down as the baseball bat armed alt-left, BLM, communists and other leftist people attacked the people with the permit; only one group had a permit to demonstrate, some were racists, but most are people concerned with protecting an historical perspective;  if you wonder why any politician wants to destroy the history and the heritage of America, like me, you might consider that evil. It appears to me that politicians deciding to hide history and destroy a segment of our heritage, is the reason for the trouble in the first place!  True, the Klan, Skin Heads, Nazi’s fought back, but if the ‘antagonistic left’ stayed away, no one would have been injured or killed.  Ask yourself, “What would happen if politicians decided to remove memorials to Martin Luther King?”  Let me be a prophet and tell you that every city in America would have riots, fires and looting!

Research has been done looking for presidential comments when left and right groups clashed over the last 60 years.  There have been 2 or 3 a year or more  and Trump is the first president to even comment, blaming “…all sides…” since the average politician is a coward and will not address matters of importance!  (Do not cite Obama’s anti-police speeches, always without the facts!) Speaking of 50 to 60 years ago, WHEN AMERICA WAS GREAT, what was the state of America:

*the GDP grew by 250%
*average incomes tripled
*the housing market was booming
*developers were building 1.5 million homes per year
*Home ownership rates exploded
*60% of Americans were in the middle class category
*Poverty rates were dropping fast
*Consumer spending doubled in the 1950s
*Divorce rates were low, while marriage rates were high and people married at a younger age than at any other time in history
*Only 4% of all babies were born out-of-wedlock, compared to 40% today
*90% of all children grew up with married parents
*there was no crack epidemic
*there were hardly any school shootings
*90% of all school levies were approved by voters
*discipline problems in school minor
*the US had the best educational system in the world at the time
*cost of living was low
*families were able to live comfortably on only one income
*Americans viewed the home and the family to be most important thing in society
*No secular humanist movement opposed the 1954 addition of “under God” to the Pledge of Alligence
*The birth rate was extremely high, women were having almost 4 children on average

Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/791894-1950s-vs-today-crime-rates-myth-20.html#ixzz4pylmSwN1

 

If you want to contribute to the destruction of America, continue supporting the demon-rat democrats and RINO repugnant republicans in “The Resistance” to making America great again! Participate with the socialists and communistic democrats!

If you love our country get on the Trump train and lend your strength to “The Make America Great Again” movement!

Let’s end with some factual humor: $50.00

Recently, while I was working in the flower beds in the front yard, my neighbors stopped to chat as they returned home from walking their dog. During our friendly conversation, I asked their little girl what she wanted to be when she grew up. She said she wanted to be President someday. Both of her parents, Democratic Party members, were standing there so I asked her, “If you were President what would be the first thing you would do?”

She replied.. “I’d give food and houses to all the homeless people.” Her parents beamed with pride!

“Wow…what a worthy goal!” I said . . . “But you don’t have to wait until you’re President to do that!”

“What do you mean?” she replied

So I told her, “You can come over to my house and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and trim my hedge, and I’ll pay you $50. Then you can go over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward food and a new house.”

She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, “Why doesn’t the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50?”

I said, “Welcome to the Republican Party.”

Her parents aren’t speaking to me anymore.

Advertisement:

I pray it doesn’t happen, but the violent left and their propagandists in the media are working overtime to force a revolution!  ARE YOU PREPARED? Like most, you are probably not!  Check out our web site, where you can get all the equipment you need to see you through a time of trouble. https://readynetwork.com/battista

If you wish to talk about this program or the purchase of the entire Ready Pack, or each individual item feel free to contact me: email me at sgtalusmc@yahoo.com

Face Book message also @sgtalusmc

Phone 928-925-8506 leave a message with your return name and number

Do Illegals Help or Hurt Our Economy?

WHAT IF THEY LEFT

Considering the Denver Post is a very liberal paper I’m surprised they published this.  This really shows how the hiring of illegal’s is a false economic practice.

Tina Griego is a Free-Lance reporter for the Denver Post.  She writes some really good stuff and she is a strong advocate for LEGAL Immigration homework on issues is part of her make-up and fabric ..

What if they left?

Somebody really did their homework on this one.  Best on the subject to date.  It does not have a political slant to it, it’s just the facts: Not Democratic, not Republican, not liberal and not conservative.

What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America?
I, Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column titled, “Mexican Visitor’s Lament.”
I interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week.  Hernandez said, “Illegal aliens pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes.  What happens to your country’s economy if 20 million people go away?”
Hmmm, I thought, what would happen?
So I did my due diligence, buried my nose as a reporter into the FACTS I found below.

It’s a good question…  it deserves an honest answer.  Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration stopped.  But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America?  The answers I found may surprise you!

In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico, it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons.  It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested.  Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.

In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grandchildren would move back “home,” mostly to Mexico.  That would save Colorado an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs.

It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.

Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens.  Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.

Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% dropout/flunk rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages.  At least200,000 vehicles would vanish from our gridlocked cities in Colorado.  Denver’s 4% unemployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.

In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America, the rule of law, and English.

In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.

If 20 million illegal aliens returned ‘home,’ the U.S.  economy would return to the rule of law.  Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage.  Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn’t be working off the books.  That would result in an additional $401 billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.

No more push ‘1’ for Spanish or ‘2’ for English.  No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids.  Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.

We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually.  That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.

In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the ‘ 18th Street Gang’ would vanish from our nation.  No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans!  No more foreign rapists and child molesters!

Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock.  Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens!
America ‘s economy is drained.  Taxpayers are harmed.  Employers get rich.  Over $80 billion annually wouldn’t return to the aliens’ home countries by cash transfers.  Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America’s economy which currently suffers a $20 trillion debt.  $20 trillion debt!!!

At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle.  At least 86 hospitals in California, Georgia and Flo rida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.
Americans wouldn’t suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country – brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.

Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities.  It would also put the ‘progressives’ on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11% of our greenhouse gases.

Over one million of Mexico’s poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas, to San Diego, California, in what the New York Times called, ‘colonias’ or new neighborhoods.  Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta w here grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse.  They live without sewage, clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation.

The New York Times reported them to be America’s new ‘ Third World ‘ inside our own country.  Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias.  (I’ve seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it’s sickening beyond anything you can imagine.)

By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico.  We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or make a better life in Mexico.  We already invite a million people into our country legally annually, more than all other countries combined.  We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation.
It’s time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life.  Interesting Statistics!

Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:
1.  $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens (that’s Billion with a ‘B’)

3.  $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

4.  $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they still cannot speak a word of English

5.  $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
6.  $3 Million Dollars ‘PER DAY’ is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.  That’s $1.2 Billion a year.

7.  28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.

8.  $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.

9.  $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

10.  The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that’s two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens.  In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US.

11.  During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from other terrorist countries.  Over 10,000 of those were middle-eastern terrorists.  Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin, crack, guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S  from the southern border.

12.  The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.
13.  In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families and friends.
14.  The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States!

Total cost a whopping $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR!  $46 billion is 8.5% of $538 billion!!!!!

PLEASE CHECK OUT OUR ADS:

1. A great investment for HARD TIMES or Camping- https://readynetwork.com/battista

2. Get your free Gold account: http://www.abundantgoldmine.com

      

 

20 of Obama’s Greatest Errors!

Reagan inherited a terrible economy from Jimmy Carter.  Bush left a terrible economy for Obama, even thought Bush warned Congress multiple times to fix it, and the democrats in congress refused to heed the warnings!  So what, old news!  True, but let’s look at the terrible things Obama left for Trump to clear up (including an economy that still hasn’t reached the level prior to the 2008 Housing Bubble Crash)!

As President Obama’s term ends, what are the results of his eight years in the White House?

Originally published on New York Analysis of Policy and Government.by Frank Vernuccio

1. Chinese, Russian, Iranian aggression increased

• In response to President Obama’s policies of reducing American military spending, and pulling back on military deployments overseas (he unilaterally withdrew all U.S. tanks from Europe, a move he was later to force to partially rescind due to the Kremlin’s aggression) China, Russia, Iran, and terrorists became more militant and active. In the largest military effort on European soil since the end of World War 2, Moscow invaded the Ukraine.  There was no significant American response. Now Russia has adopted a more threatening posture towards other European nations.
• Similarly, when China invaded the Philippine economic zone, the White House didn’t even lodge a diplomatic protest.

China now regularly engages in lawless activities.

• After eliminating sanctions on Iran in return for its limited and unverifiable promise not to develop nuclear weapons for the next few years, Tehran has become far more belligerent at sea and in its development of missile technology.
• Following the President’s premature withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq, ISIS was able to grow to enormous size.

 2. Nuclear proliferation spreading

Using similar logic and tactics that failed to rein in North Korea’s nuclear program, the results of the fatally flawed Iran nuclear agreement have resulted in a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. In Asia, America’s decreased position has made regional nations seriously consider the acquisition of nuclear weapons.

3. Relations with allies deteriorated

Washington’s relations with the United Kingdom were intentionally downgraded almost immediately after Mr. Obama took office. Antimissile agreements with Poland were pulled back.  American support for Israel was reversed. The White House encouraged the ouster of a pro-western regime in Egypt in favor of Islamic extremists. The Anti-Islamic extremist government in Libya was overthrown with American assistance, for reasons that remain unclear. The Philippines were abandoned to their fate with the Chinese Navy.

4. Loss of US nuclear supremacy

The New START Treaty gave Moscow, for the first time in history, a lead in nuclear weapons.  Mr. Obama failed to support urgently needed modernization of America’s nuclear deterrent.

5. US armed forces demoralized and diminished

In addition to reducing the budget for the U.S. military, the outgoing president initiated personnel moves, including the forced retirement of key personnel both in command and enlisted positions, diminishing and demoralizing the armed forces.

6. Afghanistan about to be lost

In a rejection of common-sense military strategy, Mr. Obama announced a withdrawal date from Afghanistan.  Rejecting long-standing U.S. policy, he opened up negotiations with the Taliban terrorists, who stand poised to retake control.

7. Middle East descent into chaos

The President’s premature withdrawal of American forces from Iraq created a vacuum that allowed ISIS and other terrorists groups to gain power. The resulting chaos has allowed both Iran and Russia to become the major power brokers in the region.

8. Integrity of key branches of government seriously compromised

Both the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service became involved in partisan political squabbles, essentially serving as enforcers for leftist causes. Significant control of the Environmental Protection Agency was given to nonelected, non-appointed partisans.

9. Race relations at lowest point in half a century

Mr. Obama, as America’s first black president, had a unique opportunity to bring the nation together.  Instead, he fanned the flames of racial tension.

10. Middle class devastated

The Pew Research Center  reveals that “The American middle class is losing ground in metropolitan areas across the country, affecting communities from Boston to Seattle and from Dallas to Milwaukee. From 2000 to 2014 the share of adults living in middle-income households fell in 203 of the 229 U.S. metropolitan areas examined in a new Pew Research Center analysis of government data. The decrease in the middle-class share was often substantial, measuring 6 percentage points or more in 53 metropolitan areas, compared with a 4-point drop nationally. The shrinking of the middle class at the national level, to the point where it may no longer be the economic majority in the U.S., was documented in an earlier analysis by the Pew Research Center. The changes at the metropolitan level, the subject of this in-depth look at the American middle class, demonstrate that the national trend is the result of widespread declines in localities all around the country.” The reason for the recent decline of the U.S. middle class and the general weakness in the U.S. economy is not the result of a cyclical downturn in business, or the bursting of a bubble.  It is not a reflection of the 2007—2009 recession.  It is the specific result of federal tax and spending practices which ignore the needs of the private sector, and redirects federal dollars away from essential needs such as economic growth, defense and infrastructure and towards entitlements (but NOT Social Security of Medicare.)

11. Decent paying jobs slashed

The president’s policies served to discourage the private sector from hiring or retaining full time employees.  The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) which excluded employees working under 30 hours a week from employer coverage was a major factor.

12. Health care system damaged

The financial structure of Obamacare never was realistic, a fact that even its architect, Jonathon Gruber, subsequently admitted. Now the nation must undo the damage done.

13. Vast increase in national debt with nothing to show for it

The national debt has nearly doubled since the President took office. There is, unfortunately, almost nothing to show for all that spending.  America’s infrastructure needs remain unaddressed, the military is underfunded, poverty rates haven’t dropped, the middle class is struggling, and more businesses are closing than opening.

14. Constitution damaged

Mr. Obama famously announced that he “Couldn’t wait for Congress to act,” even though he was legally required to work with them.  He violated provisions of the Constitution mandating Senate approval of key international moves, using the technique of labelling international deals as “agreements” instead of “treaties.”

15. Contagious diseases reintroduced through lax border control

The President clearly remained disinterested in limiting illegal immigration.  One result of Lax controls on the border was the re-introduction of contagious diseases that had long ago been eradicated in the U.S. A Breitbart report  noted: “A February 2015 report of the Southern Medical Association cautioned that, since none of the 700,000 illegal entries have been screened for infectious diseases, “Illegal immigration may expose Americans to diseases that have been virtually eradicated but are highly contagious, as in the case of TB.” The association concluded that despite the efforts of the CDC, “There’s a growing health concern over illegal immigrants bringing infectious diseases into the United States.”

16. Black poverty at epidemic levels

A Townhall and Gateway Pundit analysis reveals: What about poverty? In 2009, when Obama took office, the black poverty rate was 25.8 percent. As of 2014, according to Pew Research Center, the black poverty rate was 27.2 percent. What about income? CNNMoney says, “Minority households’ median income fell 9 percent between 2010 and 2013, compared to a drop of only 1 percent for whites.” The Financial Times wrote last October: “Since 2009, median non-white household income has dropped by almost a 10th to $33,000 a year, according to the U.S. Federal Reserve’s survey of consumer finances. As a whole, median incomes fell by 5 percent. But by the more telling measure of net wealth — assets minus liabilities — the numbers offer a more troubling story.” What about net worth and the black-white “wealth gap”? The Financial Times said: “The median non-white family today has a net worth of just $18,100 — almost a fifth lower than it was when Mr. Obama took office.”

17. Internet oversight passed to nations that believe in censorship

For reasons that have yet to be made public, President Obama transferred control of a key portion of the internet out of American hands and into those of an international body comprised of many members who believe in censorship. He did so in clear defiance of Congress, which had prohibited the use of any funds being spent for the purpose.

18. law enforcement discredited

In unprecedented fashion, President Obama has consistently criticized police officers every time a potentially racially-tinged event occurred. He has done so even before all the facts are clear. In a FOX interview, Milwaukee Sheriff David A. Clark Jr., who is black, stated: “war had been declared on the American police officer led by some high profile people, one of them coming out of the White House, and one coming out of the United States Department of Justice…”

19. Nation more divided than at any time since the civil war

In July, the Washington Post noted “The sense that America is more divided than it used to be is backed by hard data. There’s been a sharp spike in the contempt that partisans express for their opponents, according to Pew Research Center polling. More than 4 in 10 Democrats and Republicans say the other party’s policies are so misguided that they pose a threat to the nation.” During his time in office, the President engaged in the rough and tumble “Chicago Way” politics, using government facilities for partisan purposes and ignoring the considerations and ideas of those he disagreed with.

20. Manned space program in hibernation

President Obama prematurely ended the Space Shuttle program, then eliminated what had been scheduled to replace it as America’s manned space effort. He changed NASA’s budgetary focus from human exploration to endeavors mean.t to bolster his climate change beliefs.

Originally published on New York Analysis of Policy and Government.

Frank Vernuccio serves as editor-in-chief of the New York Analysis of Policy & Government (website usagovpolicy.com). He is the co-host of the syndicated radio program, Vernuccio/Novak Report, and is also a contributor to Fox News. His columns appear in many newspapers. After graduating Hofstra Law School, he was a legislative editor for a major publishing company, then served in both Republican and Democrat Administrations. Following the 9/11 attack, he was appointed to run the hard-hit Manhattan branch of the New York State Workers Compensation Board.

                         Advertisements:

Survival and Camping:

The best, low cost way to get your Survival Go Pack that is also vital for successful camping trips:  https://readynetwork.com/battista

Don’t spend Thousands of dollars on large gold coins or bullion!  Be safe and be wise and acquire low cost grams of gold for barter and purchases in a crises: http://www.abundantgoldmine.com

Interested in Hemp as medicine?  Stock your survival medicine cabinet with great, health giving products: Go to my email indicating your interest and I’ll send you the details; or phone me at 928-925-8506

WHY TRUMP AND PUTIN CAN GET ALONG WITHOUT A WAR!

“Entities are not to be multiplied above the necessary.” I try to use this principle to understand Russia – if there is a more simple way to explain something, then this way should be closer to truth than a more complex one.

 Monday, April 08, 2013

Putin vs Obama: Macho Man vs. Sissy-Boy

Source: http://tomatobubble.com/putin_obama.html

 

Putin’s mom was a good Christian lady.         Obama’s mom did soft porn.

                                                                           *That’s really her!

Maria was totally devoted to her son Vladimir.

Slutty Feminist Stanley Ann Dunham divorced twice and abandoned little Barry when he was 10.

Young Putin was serious.               Young Obama was a pot-smoking  clown.

A self described “lazy student”, Obama has a passion for smoking marijuana. (later on used cocaine)

,

.

.

.

Putin: Blackbelt in Judo.     Obama: winces like a girl at the sight of Judo.

Manly Michelle doesn’t flinch at all!

.

Putin rides horses.                      Obama rides girlie bicycle with helmet.

“Ring Ring. Safety First!”

.

Putin plays with loaded rifles.                 Obama ……… plastic squirt guns.

.

Putin power-swims in cold water.           Skinnyflab Obama wades in warm.

Putin drinks beer like a man.           Obama sips with dainty pinky extended.

He even closes his eyes as he drinks!

.

.

.

Putin drives Formula I race cars.                                              Obama…………..well.

“Weeeeeee!”

.

.

.

Putin: Navy speedboats.                                  Obama: Boogie boards.

..

.

..

.

Putin is muscular.                                        Obama is a skinny legged runt.

Putin casts his fishing rod like a man.                        Obama ………well.

.

.

.

Putin controls his dog without a leash.            Obama’s dog walks him!

                                                                           

.

Putin proudly sings his nation’s anthem.               Obama doesn’t give a damn!

                                           

.

.

Putin sits like a man.                                         Obama sits like one of the girls.

Like a boss.

Like a Boss!

.

Putin: Eye of the Tiger    Obama: Feminine look, plastic smile

“I’ll kill you.”

Putin folk dances with REAL women.           Obama girly dances with lesbians.

Lesbian Ellen Degenerate (DeGeneres)

Putin married this soft spoken beauty.             Obama……. well.

Unlike the publicity hog Michelle Obama, classy Lyudmila Putina keeps out of the limelight.

Even a pound of makeup and airbrushing can’t conceal the angry ugliness within.

Rumor: Putin’s mistress:                            Obama’s “mistress”:

 (unsubtantiated) Alina Kabayeva                             (most likely true)   Kal Penn

At least Putin’s lying liberal enemies had enough respect to link him to a hot chick.

Kal Penn is a homosexual Hollywood actor. He has been romantically linked to Obama..

Putin is great with babies.            Obama is awkward with babies.

                                                                           

Real men are totally comfortable with babies…and babies sense that.

Weirdos are cold and aloof around babies.

“What do I do with this thing?”

.
.

Babies can sense evil and danger. Obama can’t even fake a hint of true affection.

“Don’t touch me you dirty communist!”

Even black babies hate Obama.

Putin looks China’s President in the eye.           Obama bows like a weak dog.

Putin looks the Saudi King in the eye.        Obama….. W T F?!

“Bow before your King you dog!”

Putin looks the Emperor of Japan in the eye.            Obama…..WTF?!!!!!!!

The Emperor is thinking to himself: ‘Who is this idiot?”

Putin has a “badass” Magazine Cover.                     Obama……………well.

Konstantin at 11:20

https://apis.google.com/se/0/_/+1/fastbutton?usegapi=1&source=blogger%3Ablog%3Aplusone&size=medium&hl=en_GB&origin=http%3A%2F%2Fkonstantin2005.blogspot.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Fkonstantin2005.blogspot.com%2F2013%2F04%2Fputin-vs-obama-macho-man-vs-sissy-boy.html&gsrc=3p&ic=1&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fscs%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fk%3Doz.gapi.en.oKHdHV2xpm0.O%2Fm%3D__features__%2Fam%3DAQ%2Frt%3Dj%2Fd%3D1%2Frs%3DAGLTcCNd8FlX7D-ugulSNNOrsQOkuRZJKA#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled%2Cdrefresh%2Cerefresh&id=I0_1483424555622&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fkonstantin2005.blogspot.com&pfname=&rpctoken=22700724

MERRY CHRISTMAS and my GIFT TO YOU!

 

“Suddenly Liberals Are The Ones Stockpiling Food, Guns And Emergency Supplies… many liberals all over America have suddenly become extremely interested in prepping…
The election of Donald Trump has awakened the left to a degree that we haven’t seen in decades, and some on the left are embracing hardcore survivalism without any apologies.”

What is ironic about all of this is that on the other end many on the Right are thinking the war is over and are going back to sleep!

MY CHRISTMAS PRESENT TO MY FELLOW TRUMP SUPPORTERS IS DO NOT, DO NOT, DO NOT GO TO SLEEP!!!

The below article illustrates the mind set of Preppers!  It falls right into my families interest in Prepping and our ability to supply survival equipment.  To check out our many items useful in camping, hiking, and survival at home as well as in the forest, desert or mountains check out our web site at hppts://readynetwork.com/battistanda

Trumpocalypse?

Suddenly Liberals Are The Ones Stockpiling Food, Guns And Emergency Supplies…Now that the shoe is on the other foot, many liberals all over America have suddenly become extremely interested in prepping…”
Michael Snyder | Economic Collapse – December 23, 2016 3205 Comments
Trumpocalypse? Suddenly Liberals Are The Ones Stockpiling Food, Guns And Emergency Supplies.

Now that the shoe is on the other foot, many liberals all over America have suddenly become extremely interested in prepping.

Fearing that a Trump presidency could rapidly evolve into a “Trumpocalypse”, a significant number of leftists are now stockpiling food, guns and emergency supplies. In fact, even though many had expected a sharp drop in gun sales following Trump’s victory, what actually happened is that fear of what is coming under Trump pushed background checks for gun sales to an all-time record high on Black Friday. The election of Donald Trump has awakened the left to a degree that we haven’t seen in decades, and some on the left are embracing hardcore survivalism without any apologies.

What is ironic about all of this is that on the other end of the political spectrum interest in prepping is probably the lowest that it has ever been in the history of the modern prepper movement. A couple of weeks ago, I wrote an article about how it was like “a nuclear bomb went off in the prepping community“, and nothing has changed since that time.

In fact, since I originally wrote that article we have gotten some hard numbers that show how dramatically optimism about the future has surged among those on the right.

Just before the election, CNBC’s All-America Economic Survey found that only 15 percent of all Republicans believed that the economy would improve over the next year, but after the election that number skyrocketed all the way up to 74 percent.

But among Democrats it is a different story altogether. That same CNBC survey found that optimism about the economy on the left fell by more than half after the election. At this point, it is sitting at just 16 percent.

It would be hard to overstate how negatively many on the left feel about Trump. We have seen many of them take to the streets to angrily protest his election, and according to the BBC others have decided to stockpile food and guns “in preparation for social and economic collapse”…

In America, stockpiling weapons and food, in preparation for social and economic collapse, has tended to be the preserve of right-wing libertarians and foes of “big government”. But the Liberal Prepper Facebook group – up to now a small band – reports a big increase in enquiries.

“A lot of people are worried that not only will [a Trump presidency] fail but that it will fail spectacularly to the point that we are going to end up on in one or more critical situations that we are just not prepared for,” says Jeff, 36, one of the group’s members.

So could we see “social and economic collapse” under Trump?

Despite the wild optimism that we are seeing on the right at the moment, without a doubt this is a possibility.

It is funny how a single election can change our perspective on things so dramatically. During the Obama years, it seemed like the left was constantly talking about disarming everyone, but now Trump has sparked a renewed interest in gun ownership among many liberals. Prominent progressive author Ana Marie Cox is just one example…

Witness Ana Marie Cox, a popular progressive writer with gigs at MTV and the New York Times. “So who else has been researching basic disaster prep stuff?” she polled her Twitter audience on Wednesday. “Bc—congrats, right wingers—I do not trust the government to help anymore!” Her next tweet extended the holiday merriment to our nation’s Second Amendment enthusiasts: “Getting my rifle out of storage this week.”

And did you know that leftists even have their own gun organization?

It is known as “the Liberal Gun Club”, and since Trump’s victory it has experienced a huge surge in membership…

Lara Smith, national spokesperson for the Liberal Gun Club, says her organization has seen a “huge” rise in enquiries since November’s election and a 10% increase in paid members.

US gun sales hit record levels in October amid fears a Hillary Clinton election victory would lead to draconian gun control measures.

The election of Donald Trump, who was backed by the National Rifle Association early on, was thought to bring an end to panic buying. Shares in gun manufacturers even dropped by as much as 18% following his victory.

Instead, FBI background checks for gun transactions soared to a new record for a single day – 185,713 – during the Black Friday sales on 25 November, according to gun control news site The Trace.

Many on the right have responded to Donald Trump’s election victory by deciding that the battle is over and that it is time to go to sleep. But many on the left have been suddenly awakened and are now preparing for extremely challenging times ahead.

I hate to say this, but in this case those on the left that are busily preparing are showing much more wisdom than many on the right that have chosen to abandon prepping altogether at this point.

Of course most of those on the left don’t really understand the storm that is approaching. All they know is that Trump is “really bad” and therefore they need to try to get through the next four years the best that they can. Here is more from the BBC…

“We are not looking for end of the world Mad Max-type scenarios, we are not looking at a zombie apocalypse,” says the author of a left wing survivalist blog, who also reports a surge in interest since Trump’s victory.

He says it is “fairly easy to predict” an economic collapse under Trump but adds: “No matter what, the country is still going to be here in four years, there’s going to be another election.”

I would have to agree that a major economic downturn is quite likely in the very near future. We have been on the greatest debt binge in history during the Obama years, and it is inevitable that this bubble will burst.

Donald Trump basically has two choices. He could try to prolong this debt bubble for as long as possible, but that would make the ultimate outcome even worse. Or he could try to deal with the crisis right away, but that would mean an extraordinary amount of pain for all of us.

No matter who won the election, we were going to have to deal with the consequences of decades of incredibly foolish decisions sooner or later.

Let us certainly hope for the best, but without a doubt those that are preparing for challenging times ahead are showing incredible wisdom, and this includes both liberals and conservatives.

Comments

With READY NETWORK ELITE BACK PACKS we will sell you the 44 items vital in any emergency to those on the left and the right! Please visit us at https://readynetwork.com/battista

By the way, gold and silver are also valuable items in an emergency.  Ounces of gold are too expensive and cumbersome to use in barter for a meal, tank of gas or a weeks worth of groceries!  Look at grams of gold at

http://www.abundantgoldmine.com