WAKE UP AMERICA! THE LEFT WANTS YOU DEAD!

The Left’s Motive For Importing Terrorists

Articles, InstigatorNews.com 0 Comments

The correlation between the rise in Muslim violence and liberals rushing to their defense is undeniable: The more that Muslims themselves affirm our need for vigilance against Islam, the more their advocates on the left engage in damage control through disinformation calculated to placate native populations whilst Islamists advance their agenda.

syrianrefugees

The liberal narrative concerning these refugees has been beyond Orwellian, and to the rational mind, it all appears quite surreal. This widespread, toadying defense of Muslim brutality by liberals is an exquisite example of mind control via all of the methods of propaganda brought to bear against a population.

It is widely known among those who do not get their news from the alphabet TV networks that Obama has been clandestinely importing Muslims from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, and other destabilized Muslim nations for several years. Now, on the pretext of humanitarianism, he intends to prey upon Americans’ sympathy in order to import tens of thousands more.

Why do leftists advocate for a policy that will domestically destabilize America? As with so many harmful policies they’ve supported, they do so that they may later offer a statist, liberty-killing remedy. In this case, the cure will be a more well-developed surveillance and police state, which they surmise Americans will welcome when we’re being hacked to death on our streets by RADICAL Muslims.

The bipartisan legislation upon which the House voted last week to augment screening procedures for Syrian refugees passed 289-137. Although Obama said he would veto this measure if it got to his desk, the upside is that we now have a list of 137 members of Congress who should be stripped of their citizenship and exiled to Syria.
Read more at InstigatorNews

 

HERE ARE MORE LIES FROM THE PREVARICATOR-IN-CHIEF:

Obama’s Lie About Comparing Syrian Refugees To Pilgrims Exposed By Mayflower Compact

Advertisement: Protect yourself! Get small increments of Gold to provide for your family when all of these “chickens come home to roost!:  Get grams of GOLD

 Most politicians lie much of the time. 
 It is easy to see this with Obama and the Clintons.  They only time they are not lying is when their lips stop moving. Sadly, they deceive many of our fellow citizens.

Obama compares Syrian refugees to Pilgrims on the Mayflower in Thanksgiving address, as he urges America to show generosity to them

When Barack Obama compared the phony Syrian ‘refugees’ to the pilgrims who came over on the Mayflower, he was desperately hoping that you would not go and look up what the text of the Mayflower Compact actually says.

Because when you read the Mayflower Compact, the Pilgrims said that they came “for the glory of God, and for the advancement of the Christian faith”. Read it for yourself:

“In the name of God, Amen. We whose names are under-written, the loyal subjects of our dread sovereign Lord, King James, by the grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland King, Defender of the Faith, etc.

Having undertaken, for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one of another, covenant and combine our selves together into a civil body politic, for our better ordering and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the Colony, unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witness whereof we have hereunder subscribed our names at Cape Cod, the eleventh of November [New Style, November 21], in the year of the reign of our sovereign lord, King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth. Anno Dom. 1620.” source

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/embed/video/1232241.html

The Muslim jihadis that arrive here with each wave of phony ‘refugees’ are not here for the “advancement of the Christian faith”, as Obama implies, they are here to claim America for Allah and institute Sharia Law. It is a planned invasion, and sponsored by the Obama administration.

Everything that comes out of Obama’s mouth is a lie of some kind, and a simple Google search will expose it each and every time.

Geoffrey Grider | November 27, 2015 at 2:24 pm  URL: http://wp.me/p1kFP6-9Ri

Laura J Alcorn

Let’s
 Invite More to our social network.
 

Send these post to your email groups and friends. Like us on
 FaceBook

 GET YOUR FREE GOLD SAVINGS ACCOUNT!
 THE WORLD IS ON THE EDGE OF CHAOS!  PROTECT YOUR FAMILY AND
 YOURSELF.  LEARN HOW TO DO THIS. GO TO:

Press Esc or click anywhere to return to Mail.

Tchaikovsky Flashwaltz at Hadassah Hospital

Tchaikovsky Flashwaltz at Hadassah Hospital.

 

My desire is to bring some such blessing to the World!

I would love to help 1,000,000 poor people rise to a level of upper middle class!

The 1,000,000 can be World-wide, as long as the 1st 100,000 are USA citizens!

What Part of “Cheaters” do you not understand?

The BlogFeaturing fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost’s signature lineup of contributors

David Belk Headshot

More Drama from the Polls: What Have We Really Learned?

Posted: 10/05/2014 7:15 pm EDT Updated: 10/05/2014 7:59 pm EDT

Remember the 2012 election? Remember how the Presidential election was going to be so close it was supposed to go all night? Remember how the Republicans were poised to pick up Senate seats or even take the Senate? Except, remember how that didn’t happen? In spite of all the drama leading to the 2012 election, Obama won easily, the Republicans lost seats in Congress and most of us went to bed early.

So, how did we get fooled? Well, a lot of polls said a lot of races would be really close. Except they weren’t. True, certain polling gurus like Nate Silver were never fooled by all those polling errors, but many others (including Mitt Romney) were caught completely off guard.

Now, two years later, what can we learn from that mess? Could someone who isn’t Nate Silver use past polling errors to make predictions for this next election? Well, let’s start by looking at the old polling data to see what might have gone wrong.

A good place to go for all national polling data, past and present, is the website Real Clear Politics. This site posts polls for every major National and Statewide election going back to 2004. Rather than trying to weigh or analyze polls the way 538 does, It calculates a simple numerical average of all the recent polls for a given race (the RCP average). This average worked pretty well for most of the Senate elections in 2006 and 2008, and very well for the 2008 Presidential election.

But in 2010, something different happened. In the few weeks immediately before the election, the polling data indicated seven senate races where the RCP average showed that neither candidate had more than a five point lead over the other. Races this close are considered “toss ups” by Real Clear Politics. Come election day, the Democrats carried five of those elections. The was somewhat surprising, considering the Republicans were slightly favored to win four of them, but it wasn’t ridiculously unlikely.

But here’s the really strange part: The Democrat outperformed the polling average in every single race — seven out of seven times! Really outperformed them — in “toss up” races in 2010, Democrats beat the polls by an average of 4.4 percent. And in the one Senate race that was in the “leans Dem” category (where the Democrat is favored by between 5 and 10 percent) the Democrat also outperformed the polling prediction by just over 3 percent.

Still, let’s not jump to conclusions. There were a lot of races in 2010 and trying to draw any conclusion from just seven of these races is what statisticians would call drawing a bulls eye around a cluster of arrows. Now let’s look at what happened in 2012.

In 2012, the year we were expecting all the drama including Republican gains in the Senate, things really fizzled on election night. How did the polls get it so wrong that year? Using Real Clear Politics you can see that just prior to the 2012 election there were again seven Senate races in the “toss up” category. And once again, the Democrat in each race outperformed the polling average for their race, this time by an average of 4 percent.

That night the Democrats won six of the seven Senate elections that were considered a statistical tie by polling averages. What’s more, in the five races considered “Leaning Democrat” (where the Democrat polled an average of 5-10 percent better than the Republican in the race) Democrats outperformed the polling averages by an average of 5.5 percent.

In 14 “toss up” races, you’d expect Republicans to do a little better than predicted in about half (7). You might believe 5 or even 4, but the number was zero! That’s pushing pretty far past the laws of statistical likelihood. Now throw in the “leans Democratic” races, and we have 20 races where the Republicans outperformed polls in zero of them. The Democrats beat the point spread in 20 of 20 statistically close senate races. And they beat it by a pretty significant average of 4.5 percent.

And we’re not done. There were four Governor’s races that were considered either toss ups or leans Dem in 2012. In all four races the Democrats outperformed the polling averages for their race by an average of 4.4 percent. Now, there was no clear bias in the 2010 polling for Governor’s races but, when added to the Senate polling data, this does look suspicious.

And then there’s the Presidential election. In 2012 the polling average predicted Obama would only win by only 0.7 percent. Instead, he won by a very comfortable margin of 3.9 percent (about 5 million votes). Guesses are supposed to get better when the numbers get bigger, so missing the “point spread” by 4 million votes is a big goof.

That’s 25 out of 25 elections in which Democrats outperformed the polls. In every case it was for a race that was considered a statistical tie or the Democrat was slightly favored (I found no clear bias for races in the other categories). The odds of this happening purely by chance is close to a million to one!

I can’t say why this is happening, but the overwhelming numbers make it look a lot like it’s built in to the system somehow. Maybe these errors are due to political bias. Maybe the media encourages polls that make an election cycle appear more exciting than it really is. Or, maybe it’s just polling incompetence.

Whatever the reason, this year we’re again being told that the Republicans are about to retake the Senate. Also, as I’m writing this blog, there are nine Senate races listed as toss ups on Real Clear Politics. Now, I don’t pretend to know exactly what’s going to happen in November, but if history is any guide (and it often is), expect Democrats to again do a lot better than people are predicting, especially in close Senate races.

“In war, truth is the first casualty!” Aeschylus

Does the quote by Aeschylus give us the answer to why “demonrats” (sic) can never tell the truth?  They have been at war with the USA for some time, and the rest of us are only now finding out with the plethora of evidence flowing out of 16oo Pennsylvania Avenue!

View online at:  http://patriotpost.us/alexander/27654
The Patriot Post: Voice of Essential Liberty
Subscribe to The Patriot Post Support the Patriot Fund Manage Your Subscription Shop
Right Analysis | Right Hooks | Right Opinion
Patriot Headlines | Grassroots Commentary


The Warren Warning

That Other ‘Dead Broke’ Democrat

July 23, 2014   Print

“Be not intimidated … nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberties by any pretense of politeness, delicacy, or decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery and cowardice.” –John Adams (1765)

2014-07-23-800cb329_medium.png

The most despised political constituents in America are rich liberals, the self-anointed “intelligentsia” who lord over the Leftist proletariat, and are tolerated only for the graft they dispense to all manner of liberal causes and campaigns.

Though they imagine themselves held in high esteem by the recipients of their largess, they are utterly loathed by the populist 99 Percenter Demo-Party base. Of course, they are equally reviled by conservatives, who object to their smugness and their abject hypocrisy among other traits.

If there is one generalization that approaches a universal truth about the Left Elite, it is that they are chronic hypocrites. And there is no better example of this than B. Obama, who constantly rebukes “the rich,” “the wealthy,” “millionaires,” “fat cats,” ad infinitum, all in the name of “redistributive change,” while he basks in the profligate lifestyle of the most rich and famous.

For example, recall if you will Obama’s incessant vilification of “fat cats in their corporate jets.” Despite a slew of policy meltdowns, both domestic and foreign, Obama spends most of his waking hours jet-setting around the countryside for political stump speeches and fundraisers. Indeed, even the liberal Washington Post has taken notice, criticizing Obama for attending more than 400 fundraisers since taking office — nearly double the amount attended by George W. Bush at this stage of his presidency.

Thus, Obama is racking up hours on the most expensive luxury jet on the planet in order to hang with his Left Elite benefactors — all at taxpayers expense. And when he’s not flying off to hobnob with one percenters in places like the Hamptons last week, he’s off on vacations at wealthy playgrounds like Martha’s Vineyard, or taking his entourage on $100 million “family” trips to Africa.

To paraphrase Mark Twain, “Suppose you were a liberal, and suppose you were a hypocrite. But I repeat myself.”

Fact is, most rich liberals are “upstairs people” — the Dukes, Earls and Barons of Downton Abbey, Lords pretending to identify with Commoners, but washing their hands twice after contact with any of them. They only drop down from their exclusive clubs and gated communities to toss larded pork at the masses in order to ensure that the commissars who do their bidding will protect their estates.

2014-07-23-866d6da0.jpg

Of course, the 99 percenters suspend their deeply held prejudicial classist convictions when rich liberals are on ballots. They tolerate them in order to form Faustian bargains necessary to advance their statist “dependency” agenda.

Thus, while the nation languishes through the sixth year of economic stagnation, the fulfillment of Obama’s promise of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America,” and as the population numbers of his urban poverty plantations set new records, there is also another record set under his watch.

There are now 268 millionaires in Congress, and as you might have surmised the net worth of Democrats exceeds the net worth of Republicans…

But I digress.

Share

Like most rich liberals, those with presidential aspirations make every effort to cast their identity as card-carrying proletariats, who are thoroughly in touch with the “struggling middle classes.”

The most ridiculous example of this charade was Hillary Clinton’s recent effort to portray herself as “dead broke,” when in fact she and her serial sex-offender husband converted their White House tenure into wealth that now ranks them among the tiniest fraction of the richest One-Percenters.

Now, it appears Hillary has an equally disingenuous contender for the 2016 Democrat presidential nomination who may well send her packing in the primary: Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

So, just who is Elizabeth Warren?

Well, for starters, she’s another limo-liberal hypocrite. Like Clinton, she recently attempted to deceive her supporters into believing what she isn’t: “I realize there are some wealthy individuals,” she said. “I’m not one of them…”

2014-07-23-eeeb9ef6_medium.png

But according to her Personal Financial Disclosures filed in advance of her 2012 Senate campaign, she has something in excess of $14.5 million in accumulated wealth, had income in excess of $700,000 in her last year before being elected, and lives in a house valued at more than $5 million. But as for the wealthy, she’s “not one of them.”

Recently, lamenting the plight of the poor, Warren noted, “My brother lives on his Social Security. That’s about $1,100 a month. $13,200 a year.” Well, perhaps she should split her income with her brother, and donate the rest of her assets to charity.

In another fine example of deceptive rhetoric, Warren regurgitated her own version of Obama’s “You didn’t build that” insult to entrepreneurs across the nation. According to Warren, “There is nobody in this country who got rich on their own. Nobody. You built a factory out there — good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. Now look. You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea — God bless! Keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.”

Of course Warren, like Clinton and Obama, has never built anything but her investment portfolio, and refuses to acknowledge that successful entrepreneurs already pay 80% of federal and state taxes — a violation of “the underlying social contract” which should imply flat taxation. Additionally, America’s corporations pay the highest tax rates among the 33 industrialized nations. But Democrats never let facts get in the way of their classist political agenda, because their only real power is the ability to redistribute wealth to their constituents. And look what their so-called “Great Society” has gotten them.

So, why does it matter that Warren is as hypocritical about her wealth as Clinton?

Because she is a far smarter and more articulate Leftist than Clinton, and her policy positions mirror those of Obama, falling well to the left of Clinton.

She is the ideological heir apparent to Obama’s “Imperial Presidency,” and like Obama, she is a certifiable socialist — a rising star among the New Democratic Party statists, who have infested the once-noble Democrat Party. Obama ran to the left of Clinton in the 2008 Democrat presidential primary, and Warren will do the same in the 2016 primary.

Share

This doesn’t mean Warren is a presidential shoe-in. Indeed, she has said that she’s not running at all in 2016. But her performance at the “Nutroots Nation” convention last week certainly resembled the launch of a presidential bid, as she laid out her 11 Commandments of Progressivism.

If Warren runs, she would be a more formidable general election opponent than Clinton. She would also do a better job of rallying female voters — and female voters have elected every Democrat president since Kennedy.

In 1797, John Adams wrote, “If an election is to be determined by a majority … procured by a party through artifice or corruption, the Government may be the choice of a party for its own ends, not of the nation for the national good.” And that describes the Democratic Party today.

2014-07-23-83d41c8b.jpg
Leftist Leading Ladies

P.S. Despite Warren’s reassertion in an upcoming book that she has “native American ancestry,” that lie is still just that. Honest Injun.

Pro Deo et Constitutione — Libertas aut Mors
Semper Fortis Vigilate Paratus et Fidelis

Subscribe to The Patriot Post Support the Patriot Fund Manage Your Subscription
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS
*PUBLIUS*The Patriot Post is protected speech pursuant to the “unalienable rights” of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. In God we trust. Copyright © 2014 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.REPRINTING, FORWARDING AND POSTING: Subscribers may reprint, forward or post original content from The Patriot Post, in whole or part, in accordance with our Terms of Use, with the following citation: “The Patriot Post (www.patriotpost.us/subscribe/ )”

You have received this email because you are subscribed to The Patriot Post. To manage your subscription or to unsubscribe, link to http://patriotpost.us/manage/

 “May God Smile on You Today.”

What is the Miracle of Seeds all about? Find out one man’s experience at http://tinyurl.com/needseed
The Battista Family:
We thank God for the Blessings we have; and the blessings we are receiving!
                We thank God, for everything!

GoDaddy will build your business!

Ponzi Bernie Madoff is a Piker, compared to the US Government Biggest Con-Job in History!

This is the clearest presentation I have seen in quite some time.

SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS

I JUST REALIZED THAT WITH REQUIRED AUTO DEPOSIT, I NEVER GET TO SEE THE CHECK.

ALERT EVERYONE YOU KNOW.  THIS AFFECTS ALL OF US.*

SOCIAL SECURITY becomes FEDERAL BENEFIT CHECK

Have you noticed, the Social Security check is now referred to as a “Federal Benefit Payment”?

I’ll be part of the one percent to forward this.  I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you.

Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.

 The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a Federal Benefit Payment.

 This isn’t a benefit.  It is earned income!  Not only did we all contribute to Social Security, but our employers did too. It totaled 15% of our income before taxes.

If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that’s close to $180,000 invested in Social Security.

If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both yours and your

employers contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you’d have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!

This is your personal investment.  Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you’d receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month

That’s almost three times more than today’s average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration

(Google it – it’s a fact).

And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you’re 98 if you retire at age 65)!  I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.

 Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did.

 They took our money and used it elsewhere.

 They forgot (knew) that it was OUR money they were taking.

 They didn’t have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them.

 And they didn’t pay interest on the debt they assumed.And recently, they’ve told us that the money won’t support us for very much longer.

 But is it our fault they misused our investments?

 And now, to add insult to injury, they’re calling it a benefit, as if we never worked to earn every penny of it.

 Just because they borrowed the money, doesn’t mean that our investments were a charity!

 Let’s take a stand.

 We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare.

 Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government.

 Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going, for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it.

 *Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.*

99% of people won’t forward this.  Will you?

Adding insult to injury, keep in mind, Barack and Michelle Obama (I have to include Michelle, because the company that got the $600,000,000 contract had her college friend as a major officer of the company), just wasted $600,000,000 on a computer system that didn’t work.  It still seems to have problems, but they tell us that it is “fixed.”  How many additional millions did they give their incompetent friends to “fix” the system?

If they gave each citizen $2,000,000 it would have been cheaper!  We could all have afforded our own health insurance!  After each of us paid for our own life time health insurance, we would all have a lot of money left over for college, starting a business, emergencies and or anything else we wanted to do!  Either way, the American public has to pay for another $600,000,000 in wasted funds with little or no benefit—it seems like additional theft after stealing our Social Security premiums.

Only a $95 Fine the First year if you do not join ObamaScare-or ‘SAY WHAT’ !?!?

JIM MEIER OSP PROJECT ENGINEER 346 CLINTON AVE SPRING CITY Tennessee 37381 or 369 HORIZON DR N. Fort Myers Fl. 33903 RE: OBAMACARE – A comment posted on the Affordable Care Act/Obamacare FB page:

“I actually made it through this morning at 8:00 AM. I have a preexisting condition (Type 1 Diabetes) and my income base was 45K-55K annually. I chose tier 2 “Silver Plan” and my monthly premiums came out to $597.00 with $13,988 yearly deductible!!! There is NO POSSIBLE way that I can afford this so I “opt-out” and chose to continue along with no insurance. I received an email tonight at 5:00 P.M. informing me that my fine would be $4,037 and could be attached to my yearly income tax return. Then you make it to the “REPERCUSSIONS PORTION” for “non-payment” of yearly fine. First, your driver’s license will be suspended until paid, and if you go 24 consecutive months with “Non-Payment” and you happen to be a home owner, you will have a federal tax lien placed on your home. You can agree to give your bank information so that they can easy “Automatically withdraw” your “penalties” weekly, bi-weekly or monthly! This by no means is “Free” or even “Affordable.”

Kinda sheds a lot of light on all of the arming and beefing up of arms for all of the domestic departments INCLUDING the IRS now doesn’t it? There’s a war coming folks…KEEP IN MIND THE OBAMA LITMUS TEST FOR MILITARY OFFICERS-“WILL YOU SHOOT ON AMERICANS”
IF THE ANSWER IS “NO” YOU ARE OUT OF THE MILITARY!  A “YES” ANSWERS AND YOU KEEP YOUR JOB!

AWAKEN YOU CLOWNS!  THE EGYPTIAN MILITARY SHOWED THE WAY!  NO! WE DON’T WANT A MILITARY DICTATORSHIP, BUT AT LEAST YOU CAN DEMAND A REDO OF THE 2012 ELECTION.  THIS TIME, NO IRS INTIMIDATION, ID’S MUST BE SHOWN TO VOTE, AND A CLOSE WATCH ON UNION CHEATING!  I’d rather a Mormon to another communist idiot!

Before reading the article below, keep in mind Barry and Michelle Obama spent over

$600,000,000 for a computer system that does not work!!  Presumably, this

computer system was going to keep you healthy!  Please realize that money could

have put $2,000,000 into the pockets of every American! That’s right!  In the family

of 4, Papa could have bought a lifetime worth of insurance for the entire family, and

still had $6,000,000 in the bank for college for the kids, a nice family vacation and

a nest egg for future opportunities and or emergencies! Yes sir!  A crummy computer

for $600,000,000, not to count the $trillions of other dollars wasted on a stupid,

expensive health care system that most Americans don’t want!!!

Doesn’t it make you wonder where all that money went???  We would all like to

know!  We know, two students put together a similar, but functional Health Care

Computer System at little or no cost to anyone.  Many computer experts also claim

they are able to put together the functionally working system for around $1,000,000

with an additional $10 to 50 million with all of the necessary add-ons!  At worst,

the most ObamaScare’s computer system should have cost is $51,000,000.  If

they really had to spend the rest of the $600,000,000 they could have sent it to

the legal citizens of the United States!!

By the way, did you know one of the main people of the Canadian company that

got the contract to set up a non-functioning system is a college friend of Michelle

Obama!

Like you, I have no idea how they could have spent so much money on a

program that should have only cost 8% of the $600,000,000 Obama spent!  Yet, if

we had a legitimate press someone would have dug up how that suspicious

company doled out it’s largess of $600,000,0000!  Did some go to George Soros to

continue funding his leftist groups and causes? Did a chunk of it end up in the

Obama Secret Bank accounts in the Caribbean and Switzerland??  Of course, to head

off a congressional investigation, quite possibly speaker of the House Bohner and

some other Key republicans and democrats must have been paid off as well???

Who really knows, except for God, the Obama’s, Valery Jarret, the incompetent

computer company and a few other trusted Key Players! (And they ain’t saying).

Me thinks that if the public really knew the truth some very big people in

Washington, District of Corruption would be off to jail!

My wish and prayer is that the politicians in Washington would start thinking like the YouTube video below,

and get off of their greediness, corruption and egoism!

http://youtu.be/Bb7Th-RKwZ8