Hitler in the Making! Obama removing all military leaders if they will not fire on U.S. citizens!

At the end of this article is a link to a “you tube video.” First, it shows a citizen putting a city councilman in his place. Then, a number of choices come up after that first video.  Click on the video choice regarding Obama telling military they might have to shoot on Americans.  Please, invest the 20 minutes or so for this vital information!

Shock claim: Obama removing all military leaders from command if they will not fire on U.S. citizens
Friday, January 25, 2013 by: J. D. Heye
(NaturalNews) It is not a claim being made by some obscure personality who hosts a late-night “radio show” on shortwave, or by a known far-out lunatic seeking his latest 15 minutes of fame, but by none other than a Nobel Peace Prize nominee.

Reports surfaced Jan. 22 that Dr. Jim Garrow, nominated for the prize in 2009, made a shocking claim on his Facebook page in recent days that he was informed by a top military vet that the Obama administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or not they will follow orders to fire on American citizens if need be.

Garrow, founder of The Pink Pagoda Girls, a group that seeks to rescue baby girls from the officially sanctioned “gendercide” in China, is no “kook.” He’s a public figure who has been involved in “helping rescue more than 36,000 Chinese baby girls from death,” according to the Pagoda website. That knowledge alone is what makes his claim all the more disturbing and worthy of attention.

‘Litmus test’ for future military commanders?

From his Facebook post:

“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not. Those who will not are being removed.”
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038827_military_leaders_US_citizens_Litmus_test.html#ixzz2J7lVJgYs
Later, he followed up the post by adding that the man who told him that is “one of America’s foremost military heroes” whose motivation for divulging the information was to “sound the alarm,” InfoWars.com reported.

Garrow’s news comes on the heels of other notable events currently taking place, including the “national debate” over the desire by the president and many on the political Left to impose sweeping new gun control laws – including the banning of certain military look-alike, semi-automatic rifles involved in the fewest amount of gun crimes, according to the FBI’s crime statistics.

The news also follows a report from the Washington Free Beacon that four-star Marine Gen. James Mattis, head of the United States Central Command, which oversees operations in the Middle East and more specifically; Afghanistan, was “given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of” CENTCOM “and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.”

‘Why the hurry?’

Veteran National Security reporter Thomas Ricks wrote on his blog that the firing could have been linked to Mattis’ refusal to toe the line on potential military action against Iran:

Why the hurry? Pentagon insiders say that he rubbed civilian officials the wrong way – not because he went all “mad dog,” which is his public image, and the view at the White House, but rather because he pushed the civilians so hard on considering the second- and third-order consequences of military action against Iran. Some of those questions apparently were uncomfortable.

But Ricks went on to say something much more revealing – and cryptic – about the Obama administration’s national security team:

I am at the point where I don’t trust his national security team. They strike me as politicized, defensive and narrow. These are people who will not recognize it when they screw up, and will treat as enemies anyone who tells them they are doing that. And that is how things like Vietnam get repeated. Harsh words, I know. But I am worried.

Security upgrades in the era of shrinking budgets

Further, InfoWars.com reminds us:

Concerns over U.S. troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of mass gun confiscation first arose in 1995 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.” The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone of the question.

Finally, there is this, more recent, development. Security at military bases around the country are being enhanced, and all at a time when military budgets on the state and federal levels are supposed to be shrinking. The upgrades are being blamed on the 2010 Fort Hood shooting, but the government’s narrative may give away its motives: “Nearly a year after a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, the Pentagon is taking new steps to beef up security and surveillance programs at its bases, and will join an FBI intelligence-sharing program aimed at identifying future terror threats,” The Associated Press reported.

We will be following these developments.

Richard Flewelling
11:34 AM (5 hours ago)

to bcc: me
In this forward, view the youtube link below. It is about an Oak Harbor, Washington City Council meeting where a citizen stood up and talked about educating children about firearms. Very interesting and some very valid points were made. I strongley urge you to view it.

On the same page of youtube that comes up is a list of other youtube postings. One is about Obama asking the Military if they would fire on American Citizens if ordered. This is a “Must Watch” video. It is about 20 minutes long and you will find it very, very interesting.

It is of my opinion that everyone in the country should view these two videos.

Subject: Oak Harbor, Washington city councilman handed his a$$ on a platter.

Subject: Oak Harbor, Washington city councilman walks out on council meeting because of citizen with CCW – YouTube






Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038827_military_leaders_US_citizens_Litmus_test.html#ixzz2J7knsUJJ

THINK THEY’RE AFTER WE PARANOIDS?! How to answer questions that don’t need to be asked!

Subject: How to answer questions that didn’t need to be asked:

Richard Flewelling's profile photoAn article sent by Richard Flewelling@gmail.com

Here is a heads up. Read the article below on gun possession and them come back and read below….some friendly advice.

A common Rule of Thumb….whenever a bureaucrat asks you a question, a safe “answer” is to ask them a question in return. Be polite, but be firm. They often want to extract information out of you without you being the wiser. There is no transparency in the manner of their interaction with you. A good example of this is in the article below….here is what I do. You do what you want.

Example: Did you know you were speeding back there ?
answer: Was I speeding ?
What is your name ?
Is there a problem officer ?
Where are you going ?
Is there a problem officer ?
Can I look in your trunk ?
Do you have a warrant ?

Why can’t I just answer the question and be safe? In law if you answer the question [ANY QUESTION], you have “joined the issue”, meaning that you have unwittingly become a part of the officer’s jurisdiction. To “join” means to become part of an alliance, or to enter into an alliance. You have constitutional protections to guard against such intrusions into your privacy. To be safe, just follow the simple Rule of Thumb. Disclaimer: This is not to be construed as legal advice. Do you own a gun ? Why do you need to know ? Keep it simple. Stop the intrusion into something they have no business asking.

The Patriot Act was passed by both Houses. dESPITE OBAMA AND OTHER DEMOCRAT OBJECTIONS TO IT, THEY RENEWED IT AND MADE IT EVEN WORSE THAN IT WAS! Don’t help them reduce your freedom.

In the article below, use your best judgment….or you might find yourself where you don’t want to be.
Another way of finding out our “PRIVACY”
Never answer the question….
Do you have a gun in the house ? Why do you need to know ?


When I had my gangrene gallbladder taken out and spent 10 days in the hospital for what should have been an overnight stay the insurance company kicked me out. I had home nurse visits for two weeks and was asked if I had guns in the house. I respond that if I did I would not tell them. So the below has some merit.

FYI, I am passing this along… there are comments from two other people I have also been asked if we keep guns in the house. The nurse just kinda slipped it in along with all the other regular questions. I told her I refused to answer because it was against the law to ask.

Everyone, whether you have guns or not, should give a neutral answer so they have no idea who does and who doesn’t. My doctor asked me if I had guns in my house and also if any were loaded. I, of course, answered yes to both questions. Then he asked why I kept a loaded gun close to my bed. I answered that my son, who is a certified gun instructor and also works for Homeland Security, advised me that an unloaded, locked up gun is no protection against criminal attack.

The Government now requires these questions be asked of people on Medicare, and probably everyone else.

Just passing this along for your information: I had to visit a doctor other than my regular doctor when my doctor was on vacation.. One of the questions on the form I had to fill out was: Do you have any guns in your house?? My answer was None of your damn business!!

So it is out there ! It is either an insurance issue or government intervention. Either way, it is out there and the second the government gets into your medical records (as they want to under Obamacare) it will become a major issue and will ultimately result in lock and load !!

Please pass this on to all the other retired guys and gun owners… Thanks, from a Vietnam Vet and retired Police Officer: I had a doctor’s appointment at the local VA clinic yesterday and found out something very interesting that I would like to pass along. While going through triage before seeing the doctor, I was asked at the end of the exam, three questions: 1. Did I feel stressed ? 2. Did I feel threatened ? 3. Did I feel like doing harm to someone ?
omeland Security.

Looks like they are going after the vets first. Other gun people like retired law enforcement will probably be next. Then when they go after the civilians, what argument will they have? Be forewarned and be aware. The Obama administration has gone on record as considering veterans and gun owners potential terrorists. Whether you are a gun owner, veteran or not, YOU’VE BEEN WARNED !

If you know veterans and gun owners, please pass this on to them. Be very cautious about what you say and to whom.

They are coming for us, so unless you’re an ostrich or a Democrat, do not stick your head in the sand……….

“Man is not free unless government is limited.” – Ronald Reagan

How Technology, Illegal Alien Votes, and Chicago Thug Tricks Won for Obama!

The article below by Jerome Corsi will delve into the technological aspects of the Obama election run.  What is worse, are the examples of Voter Fraud:
Prescott, Arizona once had a mayor with a Polish background!  His name is Daiton Rutkowski.  When he was running for re-election, a new resident from Chicago (also of Polish descent)  went up to Daiton after a campaign speech, saying, “I want to help you win.”
Daiton said “Great, we can always use volunteers! What can you do?”  The transplant from Chicago said, “In Chicago, our union bosses had us go from precinct to precinct by bus. At each stop, a union official would get on the bus and tell each one of us what name to use for voting at this location.”
With a shocked, nervous laugh Dayton answered, “No, we can’t do that here in Arizona.”
Then, of course, was the congresswomen from Southern California speaking to a group of Hispanics.  She was pointing out the need for everyone to get out an vote!  One man stood up and in broken English said, “How can I vote?  I’m not a citizen.”
She answered, “Don’t worry about that.  We will show you how to vote!”
There are many more anecdotal incidents, but those point above and the articles below will give more evidence!

I am incredibly steamed this Thanksgiving Holiday over what the Democrats are doing to my country.

Everybody by now knows – or should know – how readily Democrats conduct election fraud, and how determined they are to defend it. James O’Keefe and others have taken videos of paid Democratic operatives encouraging citizens to vote twice. O’Keefe was even able to claim Attorney General Eric Holder’s own ballot at a district polling place by claiming to be him, and then to vote in his place. Democrats have promoted Motor Voter laws and same day registration, and month-long election days to help them mobilize the votes of people who are so unconnected to the political process and so uninterested in the country’s future, and perhaps so incompetent to understand what voting entails that they require keepers to see that they get to the polls and then vote the “right” way.  In the election that put Al Franken in the Senate by a few hundred votes, more than a thousand felons voted illegally because of the loose laws that govern the polling booth – laws the Democrats want to make even looser. It is in fact the number one civil rights issue of the NAACP this year to give felons the right to vote. So we know that Democrats have little respect for the election process, and we should assume will attempt to pursue their victories by any means necessary.
But even knowing this, I was not prepared for a conversation I had at Thanksgiving dinner today with my brother-in-law, Henry, who has lived most of his life in a home for the mentally disabled, and though now in his forties has the intelligence level of a six-year-old.
“Obama saved me,” he said to me out of the blue.
“What do you mean?”
“I voted for him for president and now he’s saving me.”
I was taken aback by these words, since Henry had no idea who Obama was, or what a president might be, and would be unable to fill out a registration form let alone get to the polling place by himself. So I asked him how he knew that and how he had registered and cast his vote. In halting, impeded speech he told me that the people who take care of him at the home filled out “the papers” to register him to vote, told him how Obama cared for him, even taught him the Obama chants, and then took him to the polling place to vote. They did the same for all of the mentally disabled patients in their care, approximately sixty in all.
This is so appalling in its contempt for the voting process, which is the very foundation of our democracy, and in its cynical exploitation of my brother-in-law and the other patients in the home, many of whose mental capacities are even more limited than his that I am at a loss for words to express it. I hope poll-watching groups like “True the Vote” will comb the rolls of residents at other homes for the mentally disabled, and attempt to stop this particular abuse. I hope that people who care about our country will make electoral fraud a focus of their political efforts, and work to protect the integrity of the voting process.
author-image by Jerome R. Corsi Email | Archive

Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers “The Obama Nation” and “Unfit for Command.” Corsi’s latest book is “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”More ↓
  • Printer Friendly
  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger

A consensus is developing in the post-mortem analyses of the 2012 presidential election that technology, combined increasingly with behavioral science understanding of voting behavior, were decisive advantages that led Team Obama to victory.

As a result, the prognosis for all future elections is relatively simple: Here come the geeks!

“Smoke filled rooms” that in bygone days were the domain of ward bosses are about to be replaced with “computer caves” where the denizens are increasingly likely to be academics more comfortable with a computer keyboard who have never actually had an in-person conversation with a voter.

The emerging conclusion is that Obama beat Romney the minute the Chicago-based bosses who managed his campaign, including Jim Messina and David Plouffe, applied ward politics to the Internet age.

In a three-part series published by Technology Review in December, Sarah Issenberg, the author of the groundbreaking book “The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns,” concluded Obama’s data techniques will rule future elections.

“What [the Obama campaign analytics] gave us was the ability to run a national presidential campaign the way you’d do a local ward campaign,” Simas told Issenberg. “You know the people on your block. People have relationships with one another, and you leverage them so you know the way they talk about issues, what they’re discussing at the coffee shop.”

The Romney campaign placed emphasis on traditional techniques of presidential campaigning – messaging and mass media advertising, focusing largely on television.

By contrast, the Obama campaign focused on Internet profiling of voters to develop voter contact information that micromanaged campaign messaging to fit the voter profile, while concentrating on fund-raising and “ground-game” efforts to get out the vote, known in professional political circles by the acronym GOTV.

Senior Editor Alexis Madrigal, writing in the Atlantic 10 days after the election noted that on Oct. 21, the Obama campaign shock-tested Narwhal, the code name for the Obama campaign data platform, putting the technology through what geeks call “live action role playing,” or “LARPing,” to determine how the computer system would perform under every possible disaster situation.

Narwhal predictably crashed, providing Obama computer experts with the information the campaign’s tech team needed to build redundant systems and put fixes in place so the computer system worked under the stress of Election Day – when thousands of volunteers in the field would need to use it.

The Romney campaign had never bothered to beta-test its get-out-the-vote computer system, code-named “Orca.” Predictably, Orca crashed on Election Day, leaving thousands of Romney volunteers standing around unable to tell headquarters in Boston who had voted and to get instructions about which voters still needed to be brought to the polls.

A 93-page analysis, “Inside the Cave: An In-Depth Look at the Digital, Technology, and Analytic Operations of Obama for America,” produced by Engage, a Republican Party-oriented competitor in the field of technology-based political marketing, makes clear how computer technology, behavioral science analysis of voters and Internet sophistication gave Team Obama a decisive edge.

As detailed in the Engage report, the Obama campaign had 1,979 employees registered on Linkedin.com, 4.4 million donors and a list of 16 million email addresses, compared to the Romney campaign’s 369 employees registered on Linkedin.com, 1.1 million donors and 2 to 3 million email addresses.

Moreover, “Inside the Cave” makes clear the Obama team used experimental trials to test every aspect of the campaign before it was put to use, including testing multiple alternative designs of email fundraising campaigns before any fundraising emails were sent to see which version was likely to produce the most dollar returns in campaign contributions.

Patrick Ruffini, president of Engage, did not return multiple WND phone calls and emails asking for an interview about his firm billed as “a full-service interactive agency with a track record of winning the toughest battles in politics and public policy,” including holding “senior new media” roles with the Republican National Committee.

In employing experimental methodology, the Obama tech team took a page from the playbook of two Yale University political science professors, Donald P. Green and Alan S. Gerber, who broke new ground introducing rigorous scientific research methodology into the study of what motivates voters, a central GOTV question.

In their path-finding book “Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout,” now in its second edition, Green and Gerber come to startling conclusions, including the admonition that telephone calling by phone banks has a minimal effect on motivating voters to vote, especially compared with in-person techniques that emphasize pounding the pavement with precinct workers assigned to knock on doors and interview voters.

The Obama campaign took Green and Gerber one step further, making sure its Internet messages were tailored to match voter interests using the same methodologies Green and Gerber have identified to ensure canvassing a precinct are armed with messages likely to be received favorably.

“Experts, be they consultants, seasoned campaigners or purveyors of GOTV technology, rarely measure effectiveness,” wrote Green and Gerber, communicating a message Messina and Plouffe took to heart.

That the Democratic Party is leaps and bounds ahead of the Republican Party in applying voter technologies is clear, in part by the reluctance of Republican-oriented consultants to go on the record.

Another group that refused to respond to WND requests for an interview was St. Paul, Minnesota-based FLS Connect, a firm contracted by the Romney campaign that advertises its expertise in “cutting edge technologies” applied to fundraising, voter and constituent contact, and data management tools.

Writing for RedState.com, Ben Howe lists FLS Connect as one of the consultants who “used the Romney campaign as a money making scheme, forcing employees to spin false data as truth in order to paint a rosy picture of a successful campaign as a form of job security.”

Tech editor Josh Peterson, writing for the Daily Caller, quoted Zac Moffatt, the Romney campaign’s digital director, as rejecting the notion that Republican-contract social media companies, including FLS Connect, should not be castigated with a broad brush as having run a “consultant con job.”

Peterson noted that Moffat resisted answering the question when the Daily Caller pressed to know what consultant firm was responsible for developing Project Orca.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/here-come-the-geeks-how-obama-won/#3yzK6xVRjkl1DWlC.99

A little rebellion every now and then …

During the signing of a bill that authorizes indefinite detention of American citizens, Obama made it clear he’s not going to let Congress’ efforts to protect religion-based values — much less the First Amendment — get in his way.Maybe it’s time to pray … before an executive order makes it illegal. Read the latest now on WND.com.

A little rebellion every now and then …

The colonists who rebelled against King George had it easy – they were revolting against “taxation without representation.”This simmering uprising is targeting something far more insidious … taxation with ineffective and inept representation.
Mathew Staver, Chairman
Liberty Counsel Action
On November 6th, when the votes were counted, Barack Obama’s vision for America won the majority vote.Now, as we regroup and mount Liberty Counsel Action’s counter-offensive, I need to know your thoughts on several key issues.  Please see my very important message below – Mat.


Throughout the 2012 election season, President Obama regularly proclaimed one thought with which we took no issue: “This election offers the American people a choice between two very different visions of our future.”

It was quite an understatement and, sadly, President Obama’s vision won.

Elections have consequences.  Under another four years of Barack Obama’s tyrannical presidency, we will certainly face dramatic changes that most Americans – including many who voted for him in both of his presidential elections – will intensely resent.

President Obama was given four more years to enact his vision in our foreign and domestic policies, the size and scope of our government, and in federal judicial appointments – all of which will dramatically impact the rule of law and determine whether or not our Constitution will bear any resemblance to the charter the Founders gave us when he is through with it.

Our most precious liberties as American citizens are certain to come under increasing fire. They may not even survive.

++We are now a severely divided nation.

Political pundits and the liberal media are busily crowing that conservatism lost in the 2012 elections, and lost BIG. They say that the tea party has been destroyed (or belief in its core principles, at any rate), that the Republican Party is in a shambles, and that there is no longer any effective political opposition to the Democrat Party.

I wholeheartedly agree that our nation is more divided than we have seen in many decades.  As I have frequently said, Barack Obama is the most divisive President in American history.Unlike Abraham Lincoln, who was known as “The Great Uniter,”  Barack Obama governs like “The Great Divider.”

Now, in light of the fundamental transformation that America has voted to continue for four more years, I must know where you stand on some of the key issues that are among Liberty Counsel Action’s core concerns.

For further information, go to http://WND.com

Obama Wants to Steal Your Tax Refunds and Savings!

<a target=”_blank” href=”http://affiliate.godaddy.com/redirect/170A3E057EFE5661396A23BD52906661B4DD21261BA25F73B20BBB32EC7EF71E83CC10E9E8475ACD8BE6BF2BAEF0390E88F58055C98146379746624407895615″><img src=”http://affiliate.godaddy.com/ads/170A3E057EFE5661396A23BD52906661B4DD21261BA25F73B20BBB32EC7EF71E83CC10E9E8475ACD8BE6BF2BAEF0390E88F58055C98146379746624407895615&#8243; border=”0″ width=”200″


The government is going to seize retirement accounts!

The National Deficit, along with the lack of demand for Treasury Bonds, leaves the
government with no other option! And what you don’t know can hurt you!

Goldworth Financial first uncovered the early blueprint of our government’s plot to seize retirement accounts in early 2009. Since that time, we have come up with 9 Basic Questions that people have about this issue:

Who’s behind the plot to confiscate retirement accounts?
The government takeover of private retirement accounts is a concept first drawn up by Teresa Ghilarducci, who was funded by the White House, the Ford Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation. President Obama’s 2008 presidential run proposed the “Automatic IRA,” which has now evolved into Ghilarducci’s “Guarantee Retirement Accounts (GRA‘s)” concept.

Why does the Government want to seize Private Retirement accounts?
They need it! China and other buyers of US Treasury (our debt) Bonds have stopped buying. The Federal Reserve reports that it is now forced to fill China’s role, and is buying over 61% of our Treasury Bonds.

Have there been any public hearings? If so, who’s involved?
There have been numerous hearings between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Labor and Treasury Departments. The topic discussed is known as the “Lifetime Income Option-Annuity Income Stream.” Here is the role that each is playing:

  • The role of the Labor Department-To draw up the guidelines for the Labor (workers) force to direct their pay into Guaranteed Retirement Accounts (GRA’s).
  • The role of the Internal Revenue Service
  • To write the laws that will tax/penalize you, if you don’t comply.
  • The role of the Treasury Department- They have Treasury Bonds/U.S. Debt they need to sell!

4. What workers’ unions are in favor of Nationalized Retirement Accounts?
Believe it or not, the SEIC, CIO & AFL are all in favor! The proposal for this is being discussed as “Re-Imagining pensions.” These workers’ unions are all in favor of “Universal Secure and Adequate (USA)” retirement for all.

John Adler, the Retirement Security Campaign Director of the SEIU, said: “We really don’t favor individual accounts as the way to go.” He went on to say: “Instead, we favor a pooled investment approach.”

John Adler also mentioned Teresa Ghirladucci’s Guarantee Retirement Accounts (GRA). Adler said, “Ghirladucci’s recent proposal of state-sponsored plans is worthy of consideration.

Okay, so unions are in favor of de-privatizing retirement accounts. But government can’t just take our money, can they?
Yes! Unfortunately, they can! Here’s a recent snapshot of recent headlines in leading newspapers:

  • May 16th, 2011-Washington Post reported: “Treasury to Tap Pensions to Fund Government.”
  • January 17th, 2012-Reuters reported: “The Treasury Dips Further into Pension to Avoid Debt Limit.”
  • April 12 th, 2012-NY Post reported: “Feds Eye Retirement-Fund Tax to Cut $16 Trillion-plus Deficit”
  • And of courseAugust 16th, 2001CNN reported : “Government Dipping into Social Security.”

If Government “borrows” money they have NO Intention of paying back, wouldn’t you call that stealing/confiscation?

Is Obama involved in the plot to seize retirement accounts, and if so, how will they do it?
Proof can be found in the Obama Administration’s 256-page FY 2013 Budget Proposal, the revival of his 2008 presidential run’s “Automatic IRA.” It has now evolved into two proposals: Secure Choice Pension and Government Retirement Accounts (GRA’s).

Some of the proposed “features” are:

  • Government will automatically deduct 5%-6% out of your earnings. Those funds will be deposited into a pooled GRA.
  • The current tax deduction will be eliminated, and replaced with a tax credit.
  • Instead of receiving a tax refund check, part or ALL will automatically be placed into a pooled GRA.
  • Worker’s un-used vacation pay will automatically be converted to income, which will be deposited into a pooled GRA.
  • The funds in your current retirement account will be converted to “longevity annuities,” which typically don’t start making income payments until the investor is well into retirement, 82-85 years old.
  • Guaranteed Retirement Accounts (GRA’s) will be administered by the Social Security Administration.
  • Much like S.S. Accounts, the uncollected equity will become the property of the Government, once the individual dies.

Okay, Government will turn my Retirement Account into a GRA, which will function as “longevity annuities.” But what’s in the annuity, and what kind of returns will I get?

According to Teresa Ghirladucci, the originator of GRA’s, the estimated return on your money will be 3%. It will NOT keep up with government-reported inflation, let alone TRUE/REAL Inflation.

The Government-run annuity will contain U.S. Treasury Bonds, Treasury Notes and Treasury Bills- everything China no longer buys.

The Treasury Department is so desperate to find new buyers, they recently announced that “taxpayers will now have another savings option-the ability to use their refunds to purchase U.S Savings Bonds without having to open an account with the Treasury; even if the tax payer doesn’t have a bank account.

analyst Hans Lorenzen said: “U.S regulators are essentially forcing banks to buy up government debt-While that helps Government Issue more and more debt, the strategy could ultimately explode if the government isn’t able to make the bond payment, leaving the holders of the bonds with toxic debt.”

Yes, through GRA’s, you will be holding our government’s toxic debt!

8. What States, Senate Bills and politicians are in favor of this new Socialistic program?

H.R. 4049: Automatic IRA Act of 2012

Sponsor: Rep Neal, Richard E. [MA-D]
Sen. Jeff Bingaman [NM-D] -September 2011
Rep Blumenauer, Earl [OR-D] – 2/16/2012
Rep Crowley, Joseph [NY-D] – 4/19/2012
Rep Deutch, Theodore E. [FL-D] – 3/29/2012
Rep Himes, James A. [CT-D] – 5/7/2012
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-D] – 2/28/2012
Rep Larson, John B. [CT-D] – 4/19/2012
Rep Lewis, John [GA-D] – 4/19/2012
Rep McGovern, James P. [MA-D] – 2/28/2012
Rep Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [NJ-D] – 4/19/2012
Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-D] – 3/20/2012
Rep Schwartz, Allyson Y. [PA-D] – 4/19/2012
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-D] – 2/28/2012
Rep Thompson, Mike [CA-D] – 4/19/2012
Rep Tierney, John F. [MA-D] – 8/2/2012
Rep Tsongas, Niki [MA-D] – 4/25/2012

Other related proposed legislation

, introduced by California Congressman Kevin De Leon. It’s known as the “Golden State Retirement Trust.” This bill is based on GRA’s.

On May 6, 2012, Lauren Schmitz, a research analyst at the Barnard L Schwartz Center for Economic Analyst (SCEPA), introduced HB5337. SCEPA is the very same Institution where Teresa Ghularducci originated the GRA concept. This Connecticut Bill is also based on GRA’s.

I don’t like the idea of GRA’s, so can I just pay the early withdrawal penalty and tax, and pull everything out of my retirement account?

No! The Government has already thought of that. On May 18, 2011, Herb Kohl (D-WI) and Mike Enzi (R-WY) introduced “S1020-Saving Enhancement by Alleviating Leakage in 401k Savings Accounts, “AKA: Seal Savings Accounts. This bill will restrict you from accessing your money. In fact, you won’t even be able to borrow from it.

Food for thought – When a country is neck-deep in debt, and has nobody to borrow from, recent history has shown us that indebted Governments steal their citizens’ wealth! Countries such as Belgium, Poland, Hungary, France, Argentina, Bolivia and Ireland have already seized private retirement accounts.

If you have read Goldworth Financial’s previous reporting on the De-Privatization & Seizure of Retirement Accounts, WHY are you waiting for the OFFICIAL government announcement: “To Protect You and for the Good of Our Country, we are Nationalizing Private retirement accounts”? By then, it will be too late to do anything about it!

It’s the old “Frog in a Boiling Pot of Water” they turn up the heat, in stages.

IF the Supreme Court’s ruling on Obamacare didn’t wake you, it should! The ruling will simply be used as case law, when government “herds” everyone into Nationalized Retirement Accounts.

You have worked Long and Hard for your money. Taxes will take a portion, inflation will take a portion… Don’t Allow Government to Take the Rest! Government money is Only a Note, a government promise; tangible Gold & Silver are Constitutional Money.

Much like Eminent Domain, most assets can be “Taken-Over” by the government.

Go to the Amazon link below for more information about the theft of your savings:

<SCRIPT charset=”utf-8″ type=”text/javascript” src=”http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822/US/purheavetday1-20/8002/055197c6-ef48-4216-b334-4ccb22cc8638″&gt; </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT><A HREF=”http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fpurheavetday1-20%2F8002%2F055197c6-ef48-4216-b334-4ccb22cc8638&Operation=NoScript”>Amazon.com Widgets</A></NOSCRIPT>

<SCRIPT charset=”utf-8″ type=”text/javascript” src=”http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822/US/purheavetday1-20/8002/055197c6-ef48-4216-b334-4ccb22cc8638″&gt; </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT><A HREF=”http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fpurheavetday1-20%2F8002%2F055197c6-ef48-4216-b334-4ccb22cc8638&Operation=NoScript”>Amazon.com Widgets</A></NOSCRIPT>

<SCRIPT charset=”utf-8″ type=”text/javascript” src=”http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822/US/purheavetday1-20/8002/055197c6-ef48-4216-b334-4ccb22cc8638″&gt; </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT><A HREF=”http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=tf_sw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fpurheavetday1-20%2F8002%2F055197c6-ef48-4216-b334-4ccb22cc8638&Operation=NoScript”>Amazon.com Widgets</A></NOSCRIPT>