As we watch the socialist democrats get crazier and crazier, we need to be prepared. Over the next several days I will post various ideas to protect yourself and family. Subjects, water, food, and a list of the minimum you need to handle a disaster.
In the meantime, take a few moments to go to my Ready Network store and see that we can supply most of what you need to purchase that you might not already have in your home. Our prices, even at retail, beat all the competition. If you join my Ready Network team I can show you how to save even more, and steer you into creating your own side-income. Check out www.prepstore.com/battista
Ready Network can supply everything but guns, and on a very limited basis, we can refer you to a gunsmith with the legal steps to acquire weapons. However, I do not recommend buying guns unless you will take the time to learn how to use them properly!
“…mainstream right is a bit different. It’s not as well organized, for a start. The vast majority of right-of-center Americans aren’t actually very interested in politics, because they’re focused on work and family. When right-wingers do get annoyed about a political issue they’re less likely to do anything about it, for the same reason – they’re busy getting on with their lives. On the other hand, if they do get pushed hard enough that they decide to take action, they’re a lot more capable of creating some serious unrest. A lot of that is down to the simple fact that the right has more guns than the left, and tend to know how to use them.”
Editor’s Note: This article is written by Giurgi C. and does not necessarily reflect this website’s options and beliefs, but it portrays some scenarios that are likely to happen.
Prepping is a safeguard against a whole range of possible scenarios, and everyone has their own opinions about what’s most likely to happen and what would be the biggest threat. There’s one thing pretty much everyone can agree on, though, and that’s that widespread civil unrest is going to bring on a social collapse, at least in the affected areas and maybe right across the country.
Who’s likely to cause this civil unrest, though? Does anyone have the ability to throw large parts of the USA into chaos? We’ve all seen often enough how local issues can spark unrest in a neighborhood or even a small city, but could the same happen on the scale of a county, a state, the whole Midwest or Atlantic seaboard?
Yes it could, and the most likely way it’s going to happen is that some incident upsets politically active people – not just in the town where it happens, but across the state or the country – so much they decide enough is enough, and try to bring about a radical change. That’s happened hundreds of times throughout history, in all sorts of countries – and while the USA is unique in many ways, it’s not unique enough to be immune from the threat of mass civil unrest.
Experts don’t argue about whether unrest could happen in the USA. It could; that’s a done deal. What they do argue about is where it’s most likely to come from. Any part of the political spectrum can be pushed into rebellion but for that to happen to the majority who’re pretty much in the center, things really have to be bad. More usually, when unrest happens it comes from either the right or left. It doesn’t always come from people who could be labeled as extremists either – often it’s people who’re identifiable to one side of center, but not particularly hard line.
Left or Right: Who Wants to Fight?
Listen to anyone on the left and they’ll tell you that the biggest threat of civil unrest comes from heavily armed groups on the “far right” or “alt-right”. On the other hand, speak to anyone on the right and they will say that the real danger is the organized and violent flash mobs of Antifa and other “far-left” groups. Are they both correct, or is one – even both – wrong?
There’s no doubt that left and right both have extremes who’re more than willing to use violence. There aren’t a lot of them on either side though, so it’s unlikely they could directly cause widespread civil unrest. What they might be able to do is cause enough trouble to provoke a backlash from the mainstream on the other side, and that really could become civil unrest.
Thanks to the media it’s right-wing extremists who get the most attention, but in fact, their numbers are very small. There are neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups in the USA, but most of them are tiny and too disorganized to cause any serious trouble. There have been lone wolf terrorists on the American far right, with Timothy McVeigh being the most notorious. They’re sometimes capable of committing serious atrocities, but mass civil unrest is beyond them.
Left-wing extremists are more numerous, unfortunately. The largest extreme left group in the USA right now is Antifa – but, with an estimated 15,000 hardcore members, even Antifa isn’t big enough to create civil unrest at a national level. Law enforcement could put down an Antifa uprising inside a couple of days. The far left might not like that, but it’s still a fact.
The mainstream menace?
But what about the mainstream left – the tens of millions of Americans who see themselves as on the left of the spectrum, but reject extremist positions like Marxism? Could they reduce the country to chaos? Yes, they could.
Mainstream leftists don’t have the enthusiasm for violence that groups like Antifa are notorious for, but they do have an endless appetite for getting involved in causes. Any perceived “injustice”, from border control to employment policies, is likely to attract a horde of protesting lefties. Usually, nothing much happens beyond legitimate political protest, but sometimes things can get out of control.
If there’s a large protest movement, and its members feel they’re not being taken seriously, tempers can rise. If the people who’re getting angry are well enough organized this is where civil unrest can break out – and the problem is that large parts of the left are very well organized. This end of the political spectrum is closely linked to labor unions and a large, interlocking network of pressure groups; they’re very good at spreading messages, exploiting social media and getting people mobilized.
Many on the left also don’t have a lot of respect for the society we live in. They would like to see it “reformed” into something that fits their ideas better, and this attitude makes it easy for them to justify breaking the law. That’s why left-wing protests are prone to violence and looting; if everything you see around you is a symbol of oppression and inequality, it’s tempting to lash out.
The mainstream right is a bit different. It’s nothing like as well organized, for a start. The vast majority of right-of-center Americans aren’t actually very interested in politics, because they’re focused on work and family. When right-wingers do get annoyed about a political issue they’re less likely to do anything about it, for the same reason – they’re busy getting on with their lives.
On the other hand, if the right does get pushed hard enough that they decide to take action, they’re a lot more capable of creating some serious unrest. A lot of that is down to the simple fact that the right has more guns than the left, and tend to know how to use them. Any large, heavily armed, combat-effective insurgency in the USA would pretty much have to come from the right; the left just doesn’t have many people with those sort of skills.
Where’s the danger?
Both liberals and conservatives have the potential to create mass civil unrest if they decide they want to. That shouldn’t be a surprise; people are people, whatever they believe, and while some belief systems seem to encourage violence in their followers any of us can be pushed to rebellion by the right factors.
If conservatives rose up that would be more disruptive, and more dangerous to the government. Firstly, conservatives are more heavily armed; secondly, they have an inbuilt respect for law and order, so for them to start overthrowing society they have to be very angry.
Realistically, though, the political left is the main threat when it comes to civil unrest. They’re organized, they get upset easily and there are a lot of them. Most unrest in western countries is caused by leftist groups, and the USA Is just as vulnerable as anywhere else. Our citizens might be better armed to protect themselves, but mass action by the left could still tear society apart in a hurry. If that happens, all the systems we rely on in everyday life will soon fall apart across the whole area affected by the disorder – and, unless you’re prepared for that, you’re in for a pretty hard time.
You may also like:
9 Embarrassing Pics Show What’s Left After Obama Legacy Met Trump:
After Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush, race relations seemed to be moving in an harmonious manner. SUDDENLY, the Obama ‘administration takes over and race relations seem to slide back more than 50 years.
9 Embarrassing Pics Show What’s Left After Obama Legacy Met Trump
What a difference an administration makes.
When President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he is pulling out of the disastrous Iranian nuclear deal, he delivered another forceful reminder of how much the American electorate changed the course of history with the results of the 2016 election.
Once the result of the election became clear, then-President Barack Obama put on a show of trying to manage a peaceful transition of power, but as the country has learned since, was engaged in a furious effort behind the scenes to undermine the Trump presidency.
That effort, in the form of special counsel Robert Mueller and the jackals of the mainstream media, has continued to this day.
Trump has already taken huge steps toward getting rid of Obama’s legacy by drastically cutting government regulations (his work on the Environmental Protection Agency alone would justify his election). His appointment of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court has given conservatives at least a chance to save the Constitution from liberal lawfare.
And while he might not have been able to keep the promise of getting rid of Obamacare yet, the Republican tax bill he signed into law in December gutted it of its most despised feature — the individual mandate — and all but guaranteed the program will someday die an administrative death.
Still, the Obama legacy lingers. Here, with some help from the Gateway Pundit, is a look at some of the low points of the Obama administration. Some are simply forgotten, but others will be reverberating in this country for a long time to come.
The selfie stick
For all the liberals who love to accuse Trump of being self-centered, few could match the self-absorption of President Selfie Stick himself. Can anyone forget how Obama demeaned himself and his office in a BuzzFeed video that showed him mugging in a mirror and playing with a selfie stick in the Oval Office? Thanks, Obama.
Sailors captured by Iran
On a more serious note, the image of American sailors forced to their knees after being captured by Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf in January 2016 is a reminder of how shamefully weak the Obama years were.
Disgracefully, Obama actually delivered his State of the Union address for 2016 shortly after the sailors were captured — and he didn’t say a word about the incident for fear of upsetting the same precious nuclear deal that Trump shattered on Tuesday.
It’s a legacy of weakness that will take more than one Trump term to dig the country out of.
The “Beer Summit”
This July 2009 incident might well have been the beginning of the Obama administration’s eight-year attack on American law enforcement.
When Obama friend and former professor Henry Louis Gates was arrested at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts by a white police sergeant who thought Gates was trying to break into the home, Obama wasted no time in declaring that police had “acted stupidly,” as Politico reported at the time.
While subsequent independent studies said both Gates and the officer missed opportunities to ratchet down the situation, Obama used the opportunity to put the spotlight on bad actors within in the police force.
Then there was the 2014 shooting of a black street thug named Michael Brown by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. Extended rioting followed and spread across the country, with seemingly every violent interaction between a police officer and a black suspect being blamed on police racism.
The lie of “hands up, don’t shoot” was born in Ferguson, along with a lingering distrust between blacks and law enforcement that’s likely to be with the country for the foreseeable future.
Again, it will take more than one Trump term to erase that stain from the Obama years. But has anyone else noticed Black Lives Matter thugs have been relatively quiet since Trump took office?
One of the most disgraceful elements of Obama’s legacy will be how elements of the media covered for him to the point of actually deceiving the American public.
In 2005, when he was still the junior senator from Illinois, Obama was part of a Congressional Black Caucus meeting with Louis Farrakhan, the racist, anti-Semitic leader of the Nation of Islam.
Although a picture was taken of the incident, Obama was never called out on it because the image itself was suppressedfor more than a decade.
When that kind of secrecy is combined with the pass Obama got on his relations with another controversial clergyman, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, it doesn’t look good for the American media.
The mainstream might despise Trump, but he’s at least given the media a way not to be the boot-licking lapdogs of the party in power they had become under Obama. Today, they’re the boot-licking lapdogs of the party out of power.
NFL anthem protests
In yet another legacy of Obama’s last year in office, NFL players protesting what they consider to be injustice brought racial division to one of the last great places in American society where fans of all races could just relax and enjoy a game.
The protests started in 2016 with San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick and kept spreading. They nearly ruined the NFL season of 2017, and might well reappear this season.. Regardless, racial division in the sports world is another Obama legacy that will take some time to undo.
Not content with stirring up the pot of racism in the country, or even pushing homosexual marriage, the Obama administration tried to force transgender bathrooms into the country at every level, starting with its schools.
Those fights are still playing out in courtrooms across the country, and commercial businesses have learned the hard waythat millions of customers don’t like the idea of little girls and women being vulnerable to any man who wants to try to pretend he’s female just to gain entry into a women’s restroom.
But the controversy is likely to continue for presidential adminsitrations to come.
America had presidents who tried drugs before getting into politics. Bill Clinton famously “didn’t inhale” (he lied about that, too.) George W. Bush admitted having had to deal with a potential drinking problem and, according to CNN, appeared to at least coyly admit having tried marijuana and cocaine as a young man.
But Obama’s iconic “choom gang” picture from his high school years set a new standard for low-life presidential behavior.
No matter what Trump critics say about him, he’s never been in a picture as low-life as this one.
Democrats like Obama might give grudging lip service to the idea of American capitalism. Except for some embarrassing “you didn’t build that” lines, they love to talk about American small businesses.
But what they really care about, cater to and will blow taxpayer dollars on are the crony capitalist businesses their friends and donors support.
Is Trump making progress taking apart Obama’s legacy?
America learned that lesson the hard way during the first year of Obama’s presidency, when his administration guaranteed more than a half billion dollars in loans to Solyndra, a company that manufactured solar battery panels in California.Obama himself toured the plant in May 2010. By September of 2011, the company was in bankruptcy, and a half-billion dollars of taxpayer money was gone. It was one of the earliest scandals of his scandal-ridden presidency, not one of which was ever fully covered by the media.
That’s another of Obama’s legacies.
Still, whatever liberals want to say about Trump, it’s a solid bet you won’t find him squandering a half-billion taxpayer dollars, or making a photo-op out of touring a business that was little more than a sham operation getting ready to fold.
That takes a combination of corruption and ignorance that liberals specialize in. Corruption is possible in any political party. Ignorance of business is a Democrat calling card.
As Tuesday’s White House announcement showed, when the American people elected Trump, they elected a change in the direction of the country.
Some of the legacies of Obama’s wretched eight years in power are gone, others will take ages to get rid of, but the process is well and truly begun.
And what a difference and administration makes.
What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!
Ready Network/ Prep Store
Subject: The day that Albert Einstein feared has arrived!
RUSH: Oh! You know, we’ve played the sound bites here a couple or three times here, Carol — Carol — whatever. The Obama tech wizardette who claims that she succeeded in getting every Facebook user for the Obama campaign in 2012. And the New York Times wrote two or three stories about the geniuses in the Obama high-tech team that did this. And she is now adding to it. She said, “Yeah, not only did we get users, we got the entire social graph.” Do you know what the social graph is? (interruption)
You don’t. Okay, well, let me tell you what the social graph is, ’cause I guarantee you there isn’t a senator up there that knows what it is, either. When you say, as this Carol whatever her last name is… Robertson? That’s not what it is, but whenever you hear her say that they got the social graph, the whole social graph, that means they got every user and every user’s known friends. That’s what the social graph is.
The social graph is not just Hoovering up the data of every user. It’s also Hoovering up the data of every friend that every user has. And she’s out there bragging that they pulled this off. Well, yesterday I think Zuckerberg denied this. You know, she’s saying that Facebook found out about it, because, after the election, Facebook came to the Obama high-tech team and started recruiting. They wanted to find people they could hire, ’cause the Obama tech team was filled with a bunch of geniuses. The New York Times said so.
And the Facebook team shows up and this Obama high-tech babe, Carol, says, “Yeah, they came in and they tried to hire and they marveled at what we had done — and they didn’t stop us because they said they were ‘on our side,’” meaning Facebook was for Obama in 2012. Of course, no mystery about that. I think Zuckerberg tried to deny this yesterday. “Nah-nah-nah-nah. That didn’t happen. We’re not on anybody’s side,” and so forth and so on. I think it…
Maybe it was Steve Scalise had brought it up, but it took two days for this example to even be brought up and asked of Zuckerberg. To me, it’s question No. 1. You got the Obama tech team wizardette bragging that they were able to suck up every user’s data in the 2012 campaign and utilize it for targeted advertising and voter outreach and what have you. The New York Times is writing stories on what a bunch of geniuses these people are and what a genius Obama is for hiring them.
To me, that’s question No. 1. But we’re talking about user privacy and user agreements and so forth. And it’s rooted, I think, in a lack of understanding on the part of elected officials about the tech itself. I’m not talking about Facebook policy but rather just the technological things that make it all possible. For example, Zuckerberg was repeatedly asked why Facebook cannot prevent hate speech and why can’t Facebook identify and deny service to hate groups. Now, you want to talk about bizarre.
You know, hate speech and hate groups to me are as specious as the concept of a hate crime. Let’s say you go out there and you murder somebody. Okay. We’ve got laws saying you can’t do it — and if you do it with premeditation, you’re going to jail, probably for life. You might even get the electric chair. But now we’ve added to it, that if you hated the person you killed because you’re a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe then we can really lower the boom on you.
Purely politics. Hate crime? That’s nothing more than the left taking control of the language and trying to structure degrees of crime based on prejudice that they want to stamp out. Same with hate speech. Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook are somehow supposed to stop hate speech? And you have members of Congress asking why Facebook cannot prevent hate speech and hate groups?
There are billions of users on Facebook, and these senators want to know why Zuckerberg can’t prevent that kind of stuff? Okay. Turn it around. Why can’t the government prevent crime and hate in a country of a few hundred million people? I mean, why can’t you guys write laws that get rid of hate? If you want Zuckerberg or social media to get rid of it, why don’t you write laws yourselves and get rid of it? It can’t be done.
Because it’s a manufactured state of mind that is entirely subjective based on what a bunch of screwball liberals thinks. Hate crime, hate groups. It’s nothing more than a new form of censorship. Here come these members of Congress asking about it because they think that this is what the American people’s genuine concerns are because they think that the Drive-By Media is representing a majority of people’s opinions in this country, which isn’t the case, as you know.
RUSH: Here’s Steve Scalise yesterday talking to Zuckerberg about Carol Davidsen bragging about all the stuff they got from Facebook for Obama.
SCALISE: In 2008 and 2012, there was also a lot of this done. One of the lead digital — or heads of the Obama campaign said recently, “Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing. They came to office in the days following election recruiting and were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.” That’s a direct quote from one of the heads of the Obama digital team. What would she mean by “they,” Facebook, “were on our side”?
ZUCKERBERG: Congressman, we didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn’t have otherwise been able to do.
SCALISE: So she was making an inaccurate statement, in your point of view?
RUSH: Special treatment’s not what this is! He obfuscated the answer there. Hang on.
RUSH: Now, Steve Scalise is the member of Congress who just asked Zuckerberg the question about Carol Davidsen bragging that they were able to get everybody, everybody and their friends on the Obama campaign for data mining to pair up advertising and other manipulative suggestive things to get people to vote for Obama, just like the so-called Russians did for Trump. Everybody does. The Russians were pikers at it, by the way, but I don’t want to distract myself here.
Steve Scalise is the Republican who was shot by a deranged leftist during baseball practice for an upcoming game between Democrats and Republicans in the House of Representatives. The guy who pulled the trigger, the guy who was trying to kill Republican members of Congress had a long list of leftist hate groups on his Facebook page that he was recommending, that he was suggesting, that he was liking. And they are still there.
All of these hate groups that this clown that tried to kill Scalise and others, this deranged Democrat from Illinois, the hate groups, they’re still there. But we’re told there isn’t any hate on the left. No, no, no, no. The hate, the hate exists only on the right. The hate exists only in the Alt-Right. The hate only exists on Fox News. But on the left, there is nothing more than utopian love.
I’m sorry here, but I’ve gotta contradict Zuckerberg. These guys doing the questioning, I don’t think they are sufficiently informed on all of this. ‘Cause here, ladies and gentlemen is what happened. Zuckerberg said in this sound bite, “Congressman, we didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn’t have otherwise been able to do. No special treatment.”
Zuckerberg said, “The Obama campaign didn’t get anything that anybody else could get.” Well, that is the exact opposite of what Carol Davidsen said. She’s the Obama tech wizardette. She said the GOP did not have the access that Obama’s campaign did. And you know what else? She said that ultimately she didn’t think that was fair, but she did it anyway because all’s fair in love and politics.
But she pointed out — and we’ve played that aspect of her sound bite on previous programs — she says the GOP didn’t have the access that Obama’s campaign did. She said back in 2015 (paraphrasing), “The Republicans do not have that information and will not get that information. I’m a Democrat, so maybe I could argue that’s a great thing, but really it’s not in the overall process. That wasn’t thought all the way through and now there’s a disadvantage of information that to me seems unfair. But I’m not Facebook. And if the advantage extends to me in politics, I’m gonna take it.”
She’s making it perfectly clear that Facebook did facilitate what they were doing and that Facebook was on their side. And if she’s saying the Republicans didn’t get anything, didn’t have the access that Obama’s campaign did, what does that mean? If the Republicans didn’t have the access the Obama campaign did, then somebody at Facebook had to know it and okay the access for the Democrats, but to deny it elsewhere.
But Zuckerberg said (imitating Zuckerberg), “Oh, no, no, no. Congressman, we didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything.” The Obama campaign was heavily recruited. These wizards of smart in the Obama tech team were recruited. Facebook went and met with them at Obama campaign headquarters after the election.
So I thought that was probably one of the most important areas to explore with Zuckerberg. Rather than go at it generically with hate speech and fairness here and there, you’ve got an actual real-world example where the Obama high-tech titan is bragging about the advantage they had because Facebook knew what they were doing and was on their side. And, by the way, why deny that? Because everybody knows Facebook’s a bunch of leftists. Because everybody knows that Silicon Valley is a bunch of leftists.
RUSH: I need to get back to the phones here. We’ve got somebody who thinks that I was wrong. That’s so rare, we put these guys to the top of the call roster. This one is Greg. He’s in Newport Beach, California. I’m so glad you called. How are you?
CALLER: Good. Thank you, Rush. Mark Zuckerberg’s answer to Steve Scalise about the access that Facebook gave the Republicans versus the Democrats? He actually answered correctly because what he had done… In Mark Zuckerberg’s answer, he compared the access that they gave to the Democrats as access that they gave to not Republicans, but to developers. As we all know, if you know anything about this, the developers have a completely different access level than, say, a third party, as in the Republicans. So they did give the Democrats and developers the exact same access. So he didn’t answer correctly… He didn’t answer untruthful, but he completely miscalculated or obfuscated and made it sound like they were giving exactly the same access, and his answer was, they did not. That’s all.
RUSH: Well, I must say the caller here is mostly correct, and the reason that he’s right is precisely because of his comments on the developer side, and I misread — therefore misinterpreted — what Carol Davidsen’s comments were. Let me… Greg, thanks for the call. You can listen to my ‘splanation here on the radio. She’s talking about the fact that they Hoovered up all of the Facebook user data and the social graph, and they do it as developers. She said, “That freaks Facebook out, right?”
She’s admitting Facebook was freaked out by what the Obama campaign did, but they didn’t shut it down while they were doing it. After they finished, after the campaign Facebook shuts off the feature, and she says that. So they shut off the feature. “Well, the Republicans never built an app to do what we did,” meaning the Republican developers did not write an app like the Obama developers wrote an app to Hoover all the data.
And her point is, she goes on to say that it wasn’t… She at times didn’t think it was fair, but so what? The Republicans could have written an app, but they didn’t. The Obama team did, and she said, “The Republicans do not have that information, and they won’t get that information,” and she says, “Now that’s a disadvantage of information that to me seems unfair, but I’m not Facebook, so this is the reality.”
And Zuckerberg was asked by Scalise if Facebook had favored the Obama campaign in this, and Zuckerberg said no special treatment. “We didn’t allow the Obama campaign to do anything that any developer on the platform wouldn’t have otherwise been able to do.” And technically, that is correct. His answer still makes it look like that they were siding with the Democrats. But I guess here the bottom line here is that Democrats had developers that wrote the app that Hoovered the data.
Facebook found out about it and didn’t stop them while they were doing it, which is why Carol Davidsen said the Facebook people showed up and said, “We didn’t stop you because you’re on our side.” Zuckerberg is denying that. But Carol Davidsen says, “No, the Facebook people showed up to recruit some of us after the campaign and they told us they didn’t shut us down because they were on our side.” The Republicans didn’t develop an app to soak up that data, and they weren’t told that the Democrats were doing it.
Zuckerberg’s point is, had the Republicans written an app, they could have. If they had a developer who wanted to write the app, suck data out of Facebook, they could have done it too. So we’re left here with the idea that the Obama campaign was simply smarter and once the Facebook people found out about it, they didn’t stop it. They shut off this ability of developers to write apps to Hoover Facebook data after the election, which mean they found out about it and let the Obama team do it.
And of course, they weren’t gonna tell the Republicans, “Hey, look what the Democrats are doing over here,” because they were on the Democrat side in all of it.
Al Battista shared a memory.
To the awakening ones, welcome aboard! Now, get busy and fight this beast!
See Your Memories
Every American has been surveilled for years! What the Patriot Act did was remove the restrictions and requirement that another nation had to do it. PRIOR TO THE Patriot Act Australia was the primary place American surveillance was centered. Since the Patriot Act, it is conducted entirely by the NSA/CIA and all the records have been stored at a giant facility in Utah! They are now building another storage facility in Maryland!
In 1974 or 1975, when I first worked for Standard Process Laboratories, John Courtney, the medical director of the company explained and taught about the vital Acid/Alkaline balance. How wonderful these simple procedures are now recognized as valid science. I DO EXPECT A VIOLENT BACKLASH FROM THE MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR CANCER INDUSTRY, SO BE PREPARED FOR THAT!
PEOPLE FIRST, PLEASE, YOU RESEARCH FUND HUNGRY PIGS!
These recommended doses of baking soda are not extreme, however, the article should mention that the body has trouble metabolizing minerals in an alkaline environment. I believe this is why the protocol calls for 6 days on, then a few days off, for 4 cycles. On the off days, the mineral balance is restored! Everything else in this article is RIGHT ON! Especially avoiding the excessive sugar, alcohol and ‘fast food!’ Also, excessive red meat adds to acidity!
It doesn’t mean you should never enjoy a steak or a hamburger, or a deliciously sweet dessert. All things in moderation! Everything as close to balanced as we can control, and the innate intelligence of the body will take over! A healthy life is a life in balance. Homeostasis is the term the scientists use for a healthy, balanced body!
THE FULL ARTICLE FOLLOWS:
The Italian doctor Tulio Simonchini claims that cancer is a fungus that baking soda can eliminate easily. According to him, this method has proven to be effective in the treatment of all kinds of cancer, he used it to treat thousands of his patients with 100% rate of success.
The fact is that baking soda can only do you good and you’ve got nothing to lose if you try this method out. Dr. Simonchini says that oncology has failed in finding a cure for cancer but doctors have the responsibility and an ethical obligation towards their patients to search for the best treatment that will finally put an end to this modern-day plague.
Cancer is just a fungus!
Dr. Simonchini goes on to say that some hundred years ago the main theory regarding cancer was that malfunctioning genes are the main factor that contributes towards the onset of this disease, indicating that it’s an intercellular disease. But he strongly believes that cancer is nothing more than a fungal infection and his claim has caused an uproar in the entire medical community.
Plants can also develop carcinomas but we know that in plants a fungal infection causes the disease so why should it be any different in humans? Fungi are tumor carriers, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown, but scientists believed that fungi appear after the disease has already developed. However, Dr. Simonchini is convinced that fungi were already there before and they’re what caused cancer. They weaken the immune system and go on full attack against our entire body, every system and every organ inside. Several studies have shown that almost every type of cancer is caused by candida overgrowth and the histological structure of cancer cells is just the result of defensive actions. As time goes by and the fungi spread and grow our body starts to get tired and weak from fighting them and starts producing unidentified cells.
If cancer is a result of fungal infection why can’t it be counteracted with antifungal medications? Well, the point is that these medications only attack the cells’ surface and this is not effective against this type of infection. The infection that leads to cancer is much more powerful and should be eliminated in another way. Dr. Simonchini says that he’s discovered the best way to deal with this infection, the best counterattack against these colonies of fungi is baking soda. There are multiple studies which show the intercellular action baking soda has against cancer.
The baking soda treatment
Dr. SImonchini has used baking soda in cancer treatments for over 20 years and the majority of his patients have completely recovered even when their doctors said there was no chance to get better. The best treatment for cancer is baking soda, an ingredient that works wonders on all types of tumors and cancers. It can be applied in the form of enema for digestive tumors, via inhalation for upper respiratory tumors and intravenously for lung and brain tumors. Local perfusion can be the method of application for subcutaneous, lymph nodes and breast tumors, while tumors of the internal organs can be treated by direct application into the arteries. The main thing we all need to look out for is the proper dosage of baking soda because every tumor requires a different dosage. The treatment should last for a minimum of 6 consecutive days and needs to be repeated in 4 cycles. It has no side effects except for maybe an excessive thirst and weakness.
Skin cancer should be treated with 0.7% iodine tincture, applied topically on the affected part of the skin for 25-30 times per day according to Dr. SImonchini.
If you suspect you have a Candida overgrowth look out for the following symptoms:
- Feeling tired all the time
- Irritability and anxiety
- Brain fog
- Chronic digestive problems
- Chronic skin conditions
- Mood swings
- Sugar cravings.
Just two of the above-mentioned symptoms in combination are a tell-tale sign of a candida overgrowth which can very soon lead to cancer so don’t ignore them.
How to prevent and treat a candida infection?
If you notice you have a candida infection or some other fungal infection you must start treatment immediately and prevent spreading. Fungal infections spread like wildfire and can soon cause a number of other health problems including leaky gut syndrome and intestinal perforations. If you want to prevent this from happening you must first eliminate candida-feeding foods such as sugars and starch. Avoid eating candy, sweets, plain bread, pasta and rice. Consume more fresh or steamed veggies and raw fruit. Many people have said that grapefruit seeds give good results in candida treatment and Dr. Simonchini recommends aluminum free baking soda for cancer treatment. Aluminum free baking soda can be purchased at almost every pharmacy and health food store.
Method of treatment
Baking soda is a highly alkaline compound which increases the alkalinity in your blood and eliminates the fungi. It acts against the tumor cells causing them to disintegrate and die off slowly.
If you have oral, colon or rectal cancer start taking a glass of water mixed with 1tsp. baking soda every morning and evening for 30 consecutive days. One month should be enough for the treatment to show full results. This therapy that Dr. SImonchini recommends also includes intravenous injections. He suggests a 500ml. of baking soda solution (5%) applied directly in the vein every day for 24 days maximum. You can perform a scan afterward and see the results. You can even use baking soda for vaginal fungal infections which are quite common these days and according to Dr. Simonchini are the main cause of vaginal tumors and cervical cancers. Mix 2tbsp. of baking soda with 2 l. of filtered water and rinse your intimate parts with this mixture. This will eliminate the infections and prevent a recurrence.
BY THE WAY, YEARS AGO, I LECTURED ON THE CANDIDA FUNGUS AT HEALTH EXPOSITIONS ACROSS THE USA. ONE ITEM I FOUND VITAL TO THE ERADICATION OF THIS FUNGUS WAS KYOLIC AGED GARLIC EXTRACT, AVAILABLE IN HEALTH FOOD STORES AND MANY PHARMACIES EVERYWHERE. The liquid form worked best. Just an afterthought, since everyone is biochemically different. So, if baking soda might need a boost for your individual needs, you might ingest a shot of Kyolic liquid to supercharge the effect! Another thought, during the off days from baking soda, Kyolic liquid would be a great bridge supplying your body some trace minerals, while holding back the fungus attacks.
I HAVE NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE SALES OF KYOLIC. I EXPLAIN THIS PRODUCT FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, BECAUSE I KNOW IT IS HELPFUL. I also no longer have any financial ties to Standard Process Laboratories. These comments are for your consideration for a healthy life!
- Your thoughts on “Doctor Shocked the World: Cancer Is a Fungus That Can Be Treated With Baking Soda!””
Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day
“Yesterday, December 7, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy — the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.”
– President Franklin D. Roosevelt
There is a beautiful lagoon in the Hawaiian Islands that is named for the lustrous jewel that is formed when a piece of sand irritates a clam into coating it to protect itself. This harbor also houses the headquarters of the United States Pacific Fleet, and has been an important part of the American Naval placement in the Pacific Ocean since 1887. Little did anyone know at that time that an attack on this harbor would bring the entire might of the American Military into a war it was desperately seeking to avoid. Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day honors the men and women who died in the Japanese attack on this beautiful harbor one December day in 1941.
History of Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day
The History of Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day is the history of the attack itself, an attack which took place on December 7th, 1941. The attack was devastating, killing over 2,400 citizens of the United States from the time it began at 7:48am Hawaiian time and ended just 90 minutes later, making the attack incredibly devastating. Multiple ships were lost during the attack, though things could have been much worse.
Intelligence gathered after the attack indicated that there was intended to be a third-wave of attacks to hit the island, complete with an invasion fleet intended to take the island and prevent it from being used as an American base of operation. The purpose behind this surprise attack? America was well positioned in the Pacific to interfere with Japanese fleet maneuvering, and it was hoped that by launching this assault they would cripple the US Pacific Presence and be able to control the ocean unhindered.
How to celebrate Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day
Celebrating Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day is your opportunity to show your support for those veterans who are still alive from the Pearl Harbor bombing, and pay your respect to those who give themselves in service to our country and its security every day. All over the US there are ceremonies to honor these men and women along with the rest of the surviving WWII veteran’s, of which there were 855,070 in 2016. Servicemen all over the world deserve the respect of their countrymen, and the war affected us all, so even if you aren’t American, pay your respects to those who serve.
Nothing I can add —
Thanks for your Service!
Yours in Patriotism,
Acting Adjutant, Chapter 691
Adjutant, Department of Arizona, Military Order of the Purple Heart (MOPH) of the U.S.A., Inc.
The mission of the Military Order of the Purple Heart is to foster an environment of goodwill and camaraderie among combat wounded veterans, promote patriotism, support necessary legislative initiatives, and most importantly, provide service to all veterans and their families.
The Military Order of the Purple Heart is a not-for-profit organization under section 501 (c) (19) of the IRS code. Donations are tax deductible to the maximum extent allowed by law.
The Purple Heart Combat Wounded Veterans of Arizona, an operating entity of the Military Order of the Purple Heart, Department of Arizona is a not-for-profit public charity under section 501 (c) (3) of the IRS code. Donations are tax deductible to the maximum extent allowed by law.
TEXT ME to order your Solar Power Generator. Compare prices–Our’s only $1,499 plus shipping and handling. Competitors over $2,000 for the same power! Text me your number at 928/925-8506 I’ll get back to you with all details!
End the hassle of needing gasoline, kerosine or other stinking fuels when the lights go out. Solar panels on your porch, generator in the kitchen! TEXT me at 928/925-8506
Christopher Harris STATES, “Many libraries in America hide or won’t carry the original #OriginOfTheSpecies by #CharlesDarwin, first edition. It makes some terrible presuppositions about people groups. Vast majority of my fellow scientists have never seen it & would categorically deny on an #emotional basis, devoid of facts. Made me rethink Bible, God, biochemically & genetically is there just one #HumanRace. What sociologists classify as RACE is not a biochemical valid classification, just a simplistic sociological construct that modern genetics substantially refuted & crushes. We have common ancestors genetically. We are #HumanBeings…”
Doug Poss: “LORD God, forgive our trespasses & offenses against You & one another +Amen”
Al Battista: In HIS time “the chickens come home to roost” and the slime pours out for all to see! AT THIS TIME IT IS WISE TO KEEP IN MIND EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO “DUE PROCESS!” EQUALLY APPLIED THOSE GUILTY WILL BE PUNISHED ACCORDINGLY, AND THOSE MAKING FALSE ACCUSATIONS WILL BE REVEALED AND HOPEFULLY PUNISHED!
Al Battista: We sit in judgement of no one else. We all have enough in our past to regret, repent from, humble ourselves, pray and seek HIS FACE, turning from our wicked ways! When we truly seek God, life becomes much easier! Please find HIM where you are! THEN A GLORIOUS JOURNEY BEGINS!
WE CAN PRAY:
MOST DIVINE FATHER IN HEAVEN, I LOVE THEE;
I’M SORRY FOR EVERY ERROR I HAVE EVER MADE THAT INTERFERES WITH THY CREATIVE OUTWORKING;
PLEASE FORGIVE ME!?!
I’M THANKFUL FOR THY FORGIVING HEART AND EVERY BLESSING THOU BESTOWS UPON US!
I THANK THEE! I LOVE THY OMNIPOTENT BEING !!!
FOR THE OPTIMIST: For all your camping supplies go to https:prepstore.com/battista
FOR THE PESSIMIST: The same web address, but some items might need to be special ordered. So if you don’t see potassium iodide pills or some other useful survival item feel free to TEXT me your phone number so we can see what we can get for you! Text me at 928-925-8506. Thanks for your interest and support.
PLEASE note: NUKE Power Plants the real danger!!!
134 In One Week! Experts Warn This Could Be The Beginning Of The Big One
WORSE YET, a scenario can unfold which could see earthquakes causing nuclear deaths that far outweighs what would happen in the event of an actual nuclear exchange between two nations! Fukushima, we know, had a meltdown in at least one unit caused by the earthquake, independent of the tidal wave that crippled the other reactors.
Still, when “a whopping 134 earthquakes within three miles of that 4.6 tremor were recorded” last week, as the Daily Star confirms to be the case, not much is said. ARE THEY HIDING SOMETHING?
When “a series of 10 mini-earthquakes struck Monterey County in the US …” since last week, almost nothing is said about the threat to that power plant.
It is even reported that a “4.6 magnitude quake 13 miles northeast of Gonzales, along the San Andreas Fault” was recorded, the largest one so far. We are seeing a lot of activity. This means that, no matter how dire the quakes and aftermath may be, the death toll will be insignificant compared to what the ruptured nuclear power plants may unleash.
Those who have studied this worrisome activity say that a magnitude 7 earthquake or stronger is due to hit the area. These are many of the same prudent minds who were ignored as they warned that Fukushima was about to happen. Powerful names like Westinghouse and General Electric (TEPCO) are behind the reason the media is so awfully silent on such a dire matter.
Of the 134, “only 17 were stronger than a 2.5 magnitude and six greater than 3.0,” according to data compiled from the USGS.
Ole Kaven, a USGS seismologist, predicts aftershocks from this activity, too. “This one has been a quite productive aftershock sequence. We suspect there will be aftershocks in the 2 to 3 [magnitude] range for at least a few more weeks.” We have been on the lookout for smaller earthquakes, as well.
For over 150 years, terrible pressure has been accumulating on the San Andreas fault, and it is not even the only active fault line in the region. California has 300(!) active faults and Seismologist Lucy Jones of the US Geological Survey, says that San Andreas is the most threatening at the moment.
“When we have a big San Andreas earthquake it’ll be felt in Las Vegas and in Arizona. It may be felt in the Bay Area,” she warns. “The damage and death unleashed by an earthquake that size would be catastrophic.”
It would take only one reactor to meltdown, melt out (explode from within), or melt through (to the water table) to be the end of American life as we define it. The authorities have already shown that they are more than willing to hide, downplay, and deny all data, so if a disaster happens, we WILL be lied to.
In no time at all, cancers, heart issues, blood traumas, and diseases too graphic to think about is so close to a turkey feast, will show the depth of their lie.
However, by then it will be far too late for that to matter.
Source: The Daily Star
- Two-Way HAM Radio with NOAA as well as, PUTTING THIS TOGETHER YOURSELF WOULD COST YOU $1,357.95
- Fishing Survival Kit (on back order)
- Two Gallon Water Container YOUR RETAIL COST FROM US IS $799.95
- Survival Whistle Combo GO TO https://prepstore.com/battista to order today!
- Survival Guide
- Zip Ties (Pack of 50) Distributorships are available: Interested, leave voice mail or text us!
- Camo Duct Tape 928-925-8506 WE GET LOTS OF CALLS, BUT WILL CALL BACK ASAP!
- Notepad & Pen
- Playing Cards with Survival Tips
- Utility Rope
AND MUCH MORE:
- Water Filter Pump
- Water Filter Straw
- Water Filter Bottle
- Water Bladder 2L
- One-Person Tent
- Camping Mat
- Sleeping Bag
- Fire Starter
- Cooking Set (10 Pieces)
- Folding Silverware
- Hatchet and Skinning Knife Combo
- Power Bank Lantern
- Solar Folding Charger
- Solar Flashlight with Radio
- Cables 4 in 1 for charging devices
- First Aid Kit
- Shovel Folding