A Funny Debate: A Proven Leader Trump versus Heartless Hillary Clinton!

Barbra Streisand must have had on her “too tight bra!”

Image Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Image Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Her politics were obvious during her post award interview with ABC News.

The logical answer to this illogical blather from another over-paid democrat operative was posted on Face Book:

Post

Al Battista ·

COMPASSION! Ms Barbra, are you dreaming? This heartless Hillbilly Clinton was fired for lying and cheating from several jobs, including by the dems “Watergate Commission” because her cut-throat tactics against Nixon were too outlandish for those looking to crucify Nixon! She had no compassion for the Americans in Benghazi or their families! She had no compassion for the women her husband tried to rape! She headed up a group, “Fight the Bimbo Eruptions” to protect her perverted husband from his sexual deviances!

Probably the worst, although not the only crimes as described here, is her lack of compassion for the USA with her UNPROTECTED EMAIL SERVER getting hacked by our nations enemies.

 

A liar and a thief!
A liar and a thief!

Yes! A debate between Trump and Clinton would be funny! An insignificant liar, cheat and thief (Yes, it is theft to use your position as Sec. of State to enrich yourself) and a man that used a borrowed $1,000,000 to build a fortune of billions! A weak sister, (in the days when so many women are proving they are strong, capable people able to match any man) against a proven leader, with a proven track record of success where he helps tens of thousands (if not millions) improve their lives here at home and around the World! A misogynistic woman against a man whose ex-wives say is “wonderful!”

Yes, Trump is a boisterous New Yorker with an intelligent brain dedicated to service, while Hillary is a “carpet-bagger” New Yorker only out to enrich herself!

Advertisements

Passive People! Why the Religion of Peace is a Major Threat to Your Family!

Today at 9:16 AM

DID SHE OR DIDN’T SHE? ONLY HER MUSLIM STAFF KNOWS FOR SURE!

… a new Mideast conspiracy theory


Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton attends a recent signing event for her memoir “Hard Choices” in Saratoga Springs, N.Y. (Mike Groll/Associated Press)

For the past few weeks, a number of Arabic-language social media users have been sharing screenshots and excerpts of a Hillary Clinton autobiography called “Password 360.” Many are shocked by one particular passage, in which the former secretary of state appears to concede that the United States, with the help of the Muslim Brotherhood, helped engineer the Islamic State extremist group.

That would be a startling admission — if it were true. Clinton’s new memoir contains no such passage. In fact, it isn’t even called “Password 360” — it’s called “Hard Choices.” Direct U.S. involvement in the rise of the Islamic State is a conspiracy theory at best.

Unfortunately, it’s a powerful one. The BBC’s Suzanne Kianpour reports that the idea appears to hold sway in Lebanon. According to Kianpour, the Lebanese Foreign Ministry summoned U.S. Ambassador David Hale to explain the rumor, and the U.S. Embassy in Beirut wrote on Facebook that any stories of American involvement in the creation of the Islamic State were “pure fabrication.”

The rumors have been around for quite some time, too: On Aug. 3, the online magazine 7iber published an article debunking the story, which it noted had been picked up by at least one major Jordanian media outlet. Lina Ejeilat, editor in chief of 7iber, says the story appears to have begun on obscure Egyptian Web sites before being picked up on more mainstream news sites and spreading through the Arab world. Although it initially talked specifically about the creation of an “Islamic state” in Egypt’s Sinai region, it appears to have evolved to also include the supposed U.S. creation of the Islamic State militia currently creating havoc in Syria and Iraq.

Ejeilat says the spread of the rumor on social media was remarkable. “Many people just wanted to believe it,” she explains in an e-mail. However, Ejeilat also notes that many others have recognized the theory as absurd and clearly fake: Twitter users have been using a satirical hashtag (“#مذكرات_هيلاري_كلينتون” or “Hillary Clinton’s Memoirs”) to mock the fake excerpts by making up their own, even sillier excerpts.

The rumors about the Islamic State and Clinton are a new variation on an old theme: that the United States supports the interests of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East. That theory has unified supporters of Egypt’s post-coup government, Shiite Muslims suspicious of the reach of Sunni groups such as the Brotherhood, and even America’s right wing. Clinton has been singled out in these theories for some time. In 2012, for example, Rep. Michele Bachmann suggested that a close Clinton aide, Huma Abedin, had infiltrated the U.S. government for the Muslim Brotherhood. Bachmann’s comments led to a scathing editorial from The Post. When Clinton visited Cairo not long after, she was greeted by placards that said things such as “Clinton is the supreme guide of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Sponsor-Generated Content How to stop an aircraft in its tracks

 Commercial carbon brakes promise efficiency for military aircraft. READ MORE

The Middle East is home to its fair share of conspiracy theories. To some degree, it is understandable, of course. There are plenty of historical examples of the West involved in secret dealings in the Middle East with disastrous results, and it is certainly true that the United States has a long, complicated history with the Muslim Brotherhood. Besides, the sudden, terrible rise of the Islamic State is difficult to comprehend for anyone, anywhere.

The reality of Clinton’s view on the U.S. role in the rise of the Islamic State is less conspiratorial but still damning. In an interview with the Atlantic, Clinton criticized President Obama for not arming Syrian rebels in the early days of the rebellion against Bashar al-Assad’s regime. She said this decision “left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled.” Clinton herself acknowledged that she can never know whether arming the rebels would really have made a difference, and some, such as the Monkey Cage’s Marc Lynch, have argued that she is wrong. Perhaps it is a better representation of recent U.S. policy toward the Middle East: hard choices, and plenty of regrets.

Laura J Alcorn

Let’s
 Invite More to our social network.
 
Send these post to your email groups and friends.

Like us on
 Facebook 

Visit America Conservative 2 Conservative at: http://americac2c.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

 
To control which emails you receive on America Conservative 2 Conservative, click here

Anti Obama and Clinton Floats in annual Carnival Parade in Germany!

THE GERMANS GET IT; HALF OF AMERICA GETS IT; ARABS LAUGH UPROARIOUSLY; MOST OF THE WORLD SEES IT!   WHEN WILL OUR BLACK AMERICANS AND THE DECEIVED WHITE AND HISPANIC AMERICANS (42% OF AMERICA) SEE IT???
My African-American brothers, please get behind Dr Ben Carson!  He will restore rightful image of all Americans!
These floats were part of the annual Carnival Parade in Germany – watched by an estimated three million people in three German cities including Düsseldorf.

Doesn’t it make you feel proud that the entire world is laughing at OUR expense? 

WHY IS BUSH THE ONLY ONE BLAMED FOR IRAQ?

This is a “must read” article!  I’m not going to apologize for going into Iraq. In fact, it was a terrible mistake at the time. Iraq was totally contained, and Afghanistan had not been made stable, yet!  However, I always support the troops where ever they are sent, while always questioning the politicians, especially in Washington, District of Corruption.

THE CIA DIRECTOR AND HILLARY CLINTON

The CIA also told the President that Hussein is supporting international terrorist groupS…

The President was also told if he builds up a strong Iraq, friendly to the US, it can be a bulwark against Iran and not our enemy. It wasn’t only President Bush, but the majority of Congress who also believed this, many of whom have conveniently forgotten.”

There are numerous quotes by Hillary Clinton, Senator John Kerry, and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi attesting to that fact; yet, the press only faulted President Bush.

Even more interesting is that President Bush is blamed for the intelligence community getting it wrong but the Obama Administration never received that same scrutiny regarding Benghazi.

THE CIA DIRECTOR AND HILLARY CLINTON by Elise Cooper

America Conservative 2 Conservative

To

sgtalusmc@yahoo.com
Today at 8:44 AM

HillBilly Clintons, Broke but Better off than the Beverly Hill Billys!

`What’s Changed Since the Marines Defeated the Muslims at “the shores of Tripoli.”

  • Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam “was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

 

The barbarians are still at the gate!

Subject: “Shores of Tripoli” Nothing like a little fresher note from history to remind us how little things have changed!

Why the Marine Hymn Contains the Verse “To the Shores of Tripoli” Muslim pirates of the past:

Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago, the United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge! 

At the height of the eighteenth century, Muslim pirates were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic.

They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart breaking letters home, begging their government and family members to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded.
These extortionists of the high seas represented the Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers – collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast – and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic.
Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. Merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain. When the U.S. Declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France. However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets.
Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy. Beginning in 1784, seventeen years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America’s Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States, rather than engaging them in war.
In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments. Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.
In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.
The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam “was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over twenty percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.
Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming. That changed everything. 
Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit. Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thugery for long enough, decided that is was finally time to meet force with force.
He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. Ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to “cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify.”
When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the might to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli. The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years, and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line “to the shores of Tripoli” in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as “leathernecks” for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.
Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply. America had a tradition of religious tolerance, the fact that Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen. A religion based on supremacism, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers was unacceptable to him. His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.
This should bother every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged, Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities. Ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah, public schools are pulling pork from their menus, on and on in the newspapers….
It’s death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our own culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further the Islamists agenda. Sadly, it appears that today’s America would rather be politically correct than victorious.
Any doubts, just Google – Thomas Jefferson vs the Muslim World 

I don’t know who wrote this piece, but I found it to be very interesting. Not much has changed, has it?

OR HAS IT!
obama-loves-his-country
His  (Jefferson’s)  greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States. I bet he never expected to see one running the White House!

Al — Maybe you’ve seen my comments in the news… at the South Carolina National Security Action Summit, I offered a blunt assessment of the Iranian nuclear talks.

The deal President Obama is negotiating with Iran is an unprecedented surrender by the United States.

Now, liberals are slandering me in the news for speaking the truth. What do you think?

If you agree that any deal with Iran that allows them to continue their nuclear program is a surrender by the United States, then click here now and pledge your support by making a donation of $10 or more to John Bolton PAC.

I’ll use every dollar to launch an all-out-assault on Obama’s defeatist foreign policy.

I’m not going to give the liberal left — especially Barack Obama, John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton — the last word at this critical point in our nation’s history. I’m asking for you to take a stand with me against their embarrassment of a foreign policy. Click here now to pledge your support.

Al, I’ve never been one for mincing words when it comes to protecting the security of America.

I will do absolutely anything to ensure that America is safe and strong, even if it means speaking the truth no matter how badly the liberals wished I remained silent.

I will not apologize for this.

I promise you: I will continue to speak out as boldly as I can against Obama’s rotten foreign policy, especially this bogus deal with Iran.

Are you with me? Or do you agree with the liberal media that thinks that if we give Iran a nuclear program they will be a happy friend to the United States and Israel? Click here now if you’re behind me.

Make the pledge today. I refuse to be silent on this, and I urge you to do the same.

For America,


John Bolton
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations

John Bolton PAC

The Deceived Ignored Obama When He Laid Out His Plans!

Face Book Conversations with a Fellow Vet and High School Buddy!

  • Bill: Obama is not destroying America. It’s millions of uninformed citizens who have either voted against their own best interests, or not voted at all. Fear & hatred do not a democracy make. Monarchy & communism have failed – democracy next? We the peeps better get off our asses.
  • Representing AmVets Chapter 18, Orange County, California.  Thanks to a solid man, General Westmoreland!
    Representing AmVets Chapter 18, Orange County, California. Thanks to a solid man, General Westmoreland!
  • Lili & Al: True Bill! Democracy fails when the lazy realize they can vote benefits for themselves, using money generated by the productive. The USA is there now! Too bad. I wish it could have lasted a lot longer than 239 years! I’m sorry for our kids, but guess we had our great life!
  •       575920_406055302774651_475600526_n
  • Lili & Al: Regarding “Obama is not destroying America” maybe you read the same article from Europe-I can only paraphrase it: ‘The USA will be able to repair the damage done by Obama if he leaves office on schedule. However, can the USA stand so many gullible (deceived) people that voted for him twice?’
  •      True Comparison
Lili & Al:  One last thought: Lili came from communist Yugoslavia, which was the least autocratic of the commie countries. True, her family had to use trickery to escape, but it was not as hostile to the West as Russia & E Germany, etc.. Despite it’s “Compassionate Communism” her experiences growing up in Serbia were very similar to her observations in Obama’s America. I have no hate or fear towards the (?progressive/regressive?) people that gave us Barry O, or towards Barry O and his cabal (or should I say Junta) either! I’ve had 50 borrowed years that God allowed me to have, filled with joy, pleasure, service and love! Any regrets I have are for the future generations of America! Too bad they don’t have any idea what they are in for! If they did they would heed your advice, “We the peeps better get off our asses.”
1934 Prophecy

Similar to how our arrogant president holds his chin!
Similar to how our arrogant president holds his chin!

Obummer

2015 is 1984!
Big Brother Barry is watching us!
Featured Image -- 875

Answer to Paul Krugman’s Stupid Statement that BO is a “great president!”

READING PAUL KRUGMAN’S RIDICULOUS STATEMENT THAT “OBAMA IS A GREAT PRESIDENT” REQUIRED THIS RESPONSE:

Krugman has to be dreaming, or else smoking something very strong! obummerscare is ripping off the working people, while giving EXTREME BENEFITS to the illegals and the lazy!
His foreign policy is to let extremist muslim terrorist kill everyone they hate, at will, actually giving the perception he is on their side!
Economically, everything he did hindered a recovery, not fix it.  if there is improvement it is because of our private people developing energy, despite obama’s effort to stop USA energy production.
obama is the biggest liar EVER in politics! The lies are too numerous to list here.
How he can have a 1% approval rating is beyond belief, since it is obvious he is a flim-flam man (con artists)! His policies hurt almost everyone!  Anyone that still likes him is either deceived or one of the few getting something from this criminal!