LEAKY STINKING, WHO IS THE STINKER LEAKING!

Anthony Scaramucci on Reince Priebus: ‘Some Brothers Are Like Cain and Abel’

White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci repeated that he and White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus were like brothers, but warned that it was still unclear whether or not they would get along in the White House.

“Some brothers are like Cain and Abel, other brothers can fight with each other and get along, I don’t know if this is repairable or not,” Scaramucci said on CNN’s New Day on Thursday morning.

Scaramucci explained comments he made on Twitter on Wednesday night, after citing Priebus in a tweet about leakers. After Politico reported on Scaramucci’s public disclosure form, he suggested that it was leaked to the media by someone in the White House.

He later deleted the tweet.

Scaramucci said that he included Priebus in the note he posted on Twitter because he was in charge of White House staff. Scaramucci’s accusations surrounded a public document, but he he made it clear that he suspected that someone in the White House notified Politico immediately.

“What the president and I would like to tell everybody, we have a very, very good idea of who the leakers are, who the senior leakers are in the White House,” Scaramucci said.

He also assured CNN that journalists who covered the White House were used to getting leaks from Priebus, which is why they suspected that he was referring to him in the tweet.

“Underconfidence plus insecurity always equals paranoia and backstabbing,” he said, vowing to find out the source.

Scaramucci refrained from naming Reince Priebus specifically, but did not defend the chief of staff.

“If Reince wants to explain that he’s not a leaker, let him do that,” he said. “But let me tell you something about myself, I am a straight shooter. I’ll go right to the heart of the matter.”

He also expressed frustration that his dinner with Fox News host Sean Hannity and former Fox News executive Bill Shine, leaked to the media minutes after it began.

“It’s absolutely completely and totally reprehensible,” he said. “As you know from the Italian expression, the fish stinks from the head down, I can tell you two fish that don’t stink, that’s me and the president.”

IF I MAY: DO YOU REALLY THINK JEFF SESSIONS AND PRESIDENT TRUMP ARE NOT STRATEGIZING ON THE PHONE EACH DAY?

President Trump will fire a “screw-up” in a minute-especially one that is disloyal!  Jeff Sessions is not either one!  So, while the real “screw-ups” and ignorant people are dwelling on the distracting Tweets, Jeff Sessions is putting into action all of the programs President Trump wants fixed now!

Yes, we would love to see the “swamp rats” at the DOJ dumped quicker, but AG Sessions is getting the goods on them first, so they can’t come back and haunt the administration as it appears Comey did! (Or did he?)  Draining a swamp is a big, complicated job!  You can’t just stick in a siphon hose, give a little suck and let the fluid flow! After all, the swamp is populated by big, big rats, alligators and a host of other dangerous critters that would love to kill those upsetting their little piece of heavenly turf! At least heavenly to them, although a tremendous  burden on the tax payer!

I hope I’m not blowing the cover of AG Sessions and President Trump, but I think it is finally becoming clear to any open-minded observer what is going on!

Jeff Sessions is taking over an agency staffed by hundreds of embedded Obama/Clinton operatives who will subvert our nation to stop the Trump administration.  Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said, “On every public policy issue conservatives care about, the Justice Department has been on the other side and usually against the rule of law … so Attorney General Sessions really has to reorient the Justice Department to actually advance the interest of the American people…”

Jeff Sessions is doing his duty against criminal gangs, terrorists, drug cartels, illegal immigrants and the usual litigation’s of the government. His effectiveness against gangs like MS-13 and upholding the immigration laws and supporting the presidents Constitutional right to put a temporary hold on refugees is outstanding!

If President Trump was that angry about Sessions’ recusal he would have fired him weeks ago! Stay awake and watch the GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH,  where President Trump has the democrats, their propaganda press and all the anti-Trump swamp looking like fools!

So Many Problems, So Little Time Left!

A comment from an earlier blog!  I don’t know how much of this statement is accurate, but I know the subject of destroying the formerly wonderful American Health Care system is accurate.  Read the letter below.

“All I can say is that the people behind Obama have to be some of the richest and most powerful people in the world in order to pull off the greatest con and hoax in world history …a foreign born person illegally elected to the presidency of the United States. … legally and illegally in putting all of the pieces into play to declare a state of emergency, institute martial law and seize dictatorial control of the United States before his current term ends. Everything about him points to this conclusion.”

 Good Morning!

Some of you seem skeptical when I mentioned Obama’s (UN)affordable care act did not cover us on Medicare unless it was treating an illness.  I promised to research a letter received some time ago that showed another person with the same problem I ran into at Mayo Clinic, once my wife’s condition had been completely free and clear for 5 years.  Here is that letter:

On Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:06 PM, Frank Giroux <rockeagle@earthlink.net> wrote:
 Where they belong!
 Apologies in advance for the language.  I do not know how to remove text from work done by someone else.  However, the message was made clear in the last election.
I have another dream!I HAVE A DREAM!
Letter from a senior gentleman in Mesa, Arizona:
Dear Family, Friends, Neighbors and former Classmates,
I just found myself in the middle of a medical situation that made it very clear that “the affordable care act” is neither affordable, nor do they care.
I’ll go back about seven years ago to a fairly radical prostate surgery that I underwent. The Urologist (a personal friend) who performed the surgery was very concerned that it was cancer, though I wasn’t told this until the lab report revealed it was benign.  Since that procedure, I have experienced numerous urinary tract infections, UTI’s. Since I had never had a “UTI” prior to the prostate surgery, I assume that it is one of the side effects from surgery, an assumption since confirmed by my Family Doctor.
The weekend of March 8-9, I was experiencing all the symptoms of another bout of UTI. By Monday afternoon the infection had hit with full force. Knowing that all I needed was an antibiotic, I went to an Urgent Care Center in Mesa, AZ., to provide a specimen, a requirement for getting the prescription. After waiting 45 min. to see the Doctor, I started getting very nauseous and light headed.
I went to the Receptionist to ask where the bathroom was as I felt that I was going to throw up. I was told that I would have to wait for the Doctor because I would need to leave a specimen and they didn’t want me in the bathroom without first seeing him.
That was when the lights went out, my next awareness was that of finding myself on the floor (in the waiting room) having violent dry heaves, and very confused. At this point, I tried to stand up but couldn’t make it, and they made it very clear they weren’t going to let me get up until the ambulance got there. By the way, when you’re waiting to see the Doctor and you pass out, you get very prompt attention.
Now, “the rest of the story”, and the reason for sending this to so many of you.
 
I was taken to the nearest hospital, to emergency. Once there, I was transported to an emergency examination room. Once I had removed my clothes and donned one of those lovely hospital gowns, I finally got to see a Doctor. I asked “what is going on” I’m just having a UTI, just get me the proper medication and let me go home. He told me that my symptoms presented the possibility of sepsis, a potentially deadly migration of toxins, and that they needed to run several tests to determine how far the infection had migrated.
For the next 3 hours I was subjected to several tests, blood draws, EKG’s, and demands for specimens. At about 7:30 the nurse came back to my room to inform me that one of the tests takes 1- 2 days to complete, I asked if they (the results)could be emailed, at which point she informed me that I wouldn’t need them emailed because I wasn’t going anywhere. I started arguing with her but was told, “if you don’t start behaving, I’ll start taking your temperature rectally, at which point I became a perfect gentleman. I did tell her I wanted to see the doctor because I had no intention of staying overnight.
Now, this is what I want each of you to understand, please read these next sentences carefully. The doctor finally came in to inform me that he was going to admit me. I said, “are you admitting me for treatment or for observation?” He told me that I would be admitted for observation. I said Doctor, correct me if I’m wrong, but if you admit me for observation my Medicare will not pay anything, this due to the affordable care act , he said that’s right, it won’t. I then grabbed for my bag of clothing and said, then I’m going home. He said you’re really too sick to be going home, but I understand your position, this health program is going to hit seniors especially hard.
The doctor then left the room and I started getting dressed, I was just getting ready to put my shoes on when another doctor (the closer) came into the room, he saw me dressed and said, “where do you think you are going?” I simply said “I’m going home, to which he replied, quite vociferously, no you aren’t. I said, “Doc, you and I both know that under the “affordable care act” anyone on Medicare who is admitted to a hospital for observation will be responsible for the bill, Medicare won’t pay a cent”.  At which point he nodded in affirmation. I said, “You will either admit me for a specific treatment or you won’t admit me.” Realizing he wasn’t going to win this one, he said he would prepare my release papers.
A few minutes later the discharge nurse came to my room to have me sign the necessary papers, relieving them from any responsibility. I told her I wasn’t trying to be obstinate, but I wasn’t going to be burdened with the full (financial) responsibility for my hospital stay.
After making sure the door was closed, she said, “I don’t blame you at all, I would do the same thing.”  She went on to say, “You wouldn’t believe the people who elect to leave for the same reasons, people who are deathly sick, people who have to be wheeled out on a gurney.” She further said, “The ‘Affordable Care Act’ is going to be a disaster for seniors. Yet, if you are in this country illegally, and have no coverage, you will be covered in full.
This is not internet hype folks, this is real, I just experienced it personally.  Moving right along, this gets worse.
Today I went to a (required) follow up appointment with my Arizona Family Practitioner. Since my white count was pretty high, the follow up was important. During the visit I shared the experience at emergency, and that I had refused to be admitted. His response was “I don’t blame you at all, I would have done the same thing”.  He went on to say that the colonoscopy and other procedures are probably going to be dropped from coverage for those over 70.

 
I told him that I had heard that the affordable care act would no longer pay for cancer treatment for those 76 and older, is that true? His understanding is that it is true.
The more I hear, and experience the Affordable Care Act, the more I’m beginning to see that we seniors are nothing more than an inconvenience, and the sooner they can get rid of us the better off they’ll be.
November is coming folks, we can have an impact on this debacle by letting everyone in Congress know that their responsibility is to the constituents, not the president and not the lobbyists. We need to let them ALL know that they are in office to serve and to look after the BEST INTERESTS of “we the people”, their employers, and not to become self serving bureaucrats who serve only out of greed. And if they don’t seem to understand this simple logic, we’ll fire them.
On the mend, (signed)
REMEMBER:  Demand your hospital admission is for TREATMENT and NOT for OBSERVATION!
PS
You have seen nothing yet!  Just wait until many of the company supplied health care
is cancelled, and the “Death Panels” get their power in January 2015! If you are over 70 and get ill, bend over and kiss your butt goodbye!

PPS
Mayo now has us fill out a form at every visit, and we are back to paying only the Medicare 20%–however, nothing can remove the big bill we ignorantly got stuck with! We are hoping ChampVA will suck up that 20%, but it still is an open question!?

They have the gall to call Social Security an Entitlement!

UNLESS YOU PUT ALL OF THE POLITICIANS IN JAIL FOR RUNNING A PONZI SCHEME, BERNIE MADOFF SHOULD BE PARDONED!
      *Who died before they collected Social Security?*

* KEEP PASSING THIS AROUND UNTIL EVERY ONE HAS HAD THE  OPPORTUNITY TO READ
IT…*

*THIS IS SURE SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT!!!!  *

*THE ONLY THING WRONG WITH THE GOVERNMENT’S CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE
SOCIAL SECURITY IS THEY FORGOT TO FIGURE IN THE PEOPLE WHO DIED BEFORE THEY
EVER COLLECTED A SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK!!!*

*WHERE DID THAT MONEY GO?*

*Remember, not only did you and I contribute to Social Security but your
employer did, too.*

*It totaled 15% of your income before taxes.*

*If you averaged only $30K over your working life, that’s close to
$220,500.*

*Read that again.*

* Did you see where the Government paid in one single penny?*

*We are talking about the money you and your employer put in a Government
bank to ensure you and me that we would have a retirement check from the
money we put in, not the Government.*

*Now they are calling the money we put in an entitlement when we reach
the age to take it back.*

*If you calculate the future invested value of $4,500 per year (yours &
your employer’s contribution) at a simple 5% interest (less than what the
Government pays on the money that it borrows)*

*After 49 years of working you’d have $892,919.98. If you took out only
3% per year, *
*you’d receive $26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30
years (until you’re 95 if you retire at age 65) and that’s with no interest
paid on that final amount on deposit!*

*If you bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you’d have a lifetime
income of $2,976.40 per month.*

*THE FOLKS IN WASHINGTON HAVE PULLED OFF A BIGGER PONZI SCHEME THAN
BERNIE MADOFF EVER DID.*

*Entitlement my foot; I paid cash for my social security insurance!*

*Just because they borrowed the money for other government spending,
doesn’t make my benefits some kind of charity or handout!!  Remember
Congressional benefits? — free healthcare, outrageous retirement
packages, 67 paid holidays, three weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick
days.*

*Now that’s welfare, and they have the nerve to call my social security
retirement payments entitlements?*

*They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most
of us have been paying for it all our working lives, and now, when it’s
time for us to collect, the government is running out of money.*

*Why did the government borrow from it in the first place?  Why was it
allowed?*

*It was supposed to be in a locked box, not part of the general fund.*

*Sad isn’t it?*

Genevieve Wood, senior contributor to Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal, agrees that the “war on women” is political posturing and says it doesn’t reflect our current reality.

In an article for USA Today, she points out that for every 100 college degrees of all kinds earned by men last year, women earned 140.

Referring to claims that women make 77 cents for every dollar men make, Wood writes that “when you compare men and women in similar jobs, with similar experience, education, years in the workforce, and hours worked, the wage gap all but disappears.”

She also notes that studies show women control more than 50 percent of private wealth in the United States, and over 40 percent of the 3 million Americans earning more than $500,000 a year are women.

She concludes: “Women do face challenges today, just not the ones many on the left are trying to solve via victim-hood politics and policies.”

*99% of people won’t have the guts to forward this.*

*I’m in the 1% and I JUST DID!*

 

NumbersUSA: More Americans leave the labor force, but will anyone in Washington take their side on immigration?

While the Obama Administration considers whether or not it will grant amnesty and work permits to a significant portion of country’s illegal-alien population, the employment situation for American workers worsened last month. The unemployment rate dropped slightly in August, but mostly because of an increasing number of Americans leaving the labor force. The labor participation rate dropped to its lowest since the 1970s after 268,000 Americans gave up on their job search

A couple of pertinent points before getting to the destruction of the American Labor Force issue:

Subject: Pres. Obama and General Greene who died in Afghanistan

Two star Major General Harold Greene was killed in Afghanistan on August 8, 2014 while serving his country in pride for 34 years. As of 1972, he was the highest ranking officer in the military killed in action since the Vietnam war.  President Obama has not mentioned anything in regards to this highly decorated soldier yet he spoke highly of Robin Williams who committed suicide. He was buried August 14 in the Arlington National Cemetery. Neither the President, Vice President, Secretary of State nor Secretary of Defense attended the funeral. President Obama was on vacation, playing golf at Martha’s Vineyard. No flags were ordered to half mask yet they were for Whitney Houston who also committed suicide.  I find this very offensive and disrespectful to the veterans who have served our great country. But then again, why does this not surprise me.

Do what you want with this email but I am sending it on.

David Eads

USMC 1971-1973

I can’t believe 40 % of Americans haven’t seen thru this scam artist yet? My black brothers “WAKE UP!”
As a whole, Black people have done much better under Nixon/Ford, Reagan, both Bush’s, and even Clinton.
Under Obama the entire country, especially Blacks, have suffered. It’s time to put the adults back in charge of the country! Vote for Ben Carson, MD to restore prestige in the Black community (other wise, Obama has ruined it to ever see another Black president)!
Reagan inherited a much worse situation from Jimmy Carter, and fixed the economy and international status of the USA in 3 years. Obama has had 6 years, and unless you are in that rich 1%, your situation is worse than it was when he took office. Our international status is an embarrassment! Obama and his rich 1% want to keep all of the rest of us in a state of slavery so we can serve their greedy desires.
Democrats win the presidency when the Republicans fix every thing. Then the foolish demonRats ruin everything, and the people vote in the adults to fix it up again! Yes, there are a lot of crummy republicans too, but there is only crummy democrats. At least with the adults, they can fix problems the kids create, which is why they are RepublICANS, and not democRATS!

The past is instructive: Through 2006 gas was less than $2 a gallon, unemployment hovered around 5% which is nearly full employment.  The RepublICANS ran the show until January 2007 when the democRATS took over.  We all watched the disaster unfold over the next two years, as the perps of the destruction were blaming Bush!  That gave us Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama to complete the destruction, as he continued to blame Bush!

Comments gleened from National/global news alert  •  Fri., Sep. 5, 2014

 

BLS: More Americans Leave Labor Force in August

While the Obama Administration considers whether or not it will grant amnesty and work permits to a significant portion of the country’s illegal-alien population, the employment situation for American workers worsened last month. The unemployment rate dropped slightly in August, but mostly because of an increased number of Americans who left the labor force. The labor participation rate dropped to its lowest since the 1970s after 268,000 Americans gave up on their job search.

In addition, the number of new jobs created in August by employers was at its lowest rate this year (142,000) well below the 225,000 jobs that economists had anticipated.

Last week, Pres. Obama confirmed his desire to move forward with an executive action that would amnesty millions of illegal aliens and provide them with work permits, but he didn’t indicate when the action may go into effect. His announcement was followed with concerns from within his own party about the impact of an executive amnesty on November’s mid-term elections.

Increasingly, Republican candidates (especially in competitive Senate races with a Democrat incumbent) have described the Administration’s proposed plan as a war on American workers; an argument that’s been articulated by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) for years. In an Brietbart.com interview posted today, Roy noted that for the last 18 months Sen. Sessions has been about the only national voice on the side of the American worker on the issue of immigration.

The public is ready to back the leaders in the party that shows they will truly go to the line for the workers…

The Republican voice is sounding more like Jeff Sessions. The more that the Republican voice is the message of Jeff Sessions, the less likely that Obama is going to be able to try to pull another executive amnesty.

Roy Beck

Also in recent weeks, a former Presidential candidate and potential candidate for 2016, Rick Santorum, sided with the American worker during a speech at the Family Leadership Summit. Santorum called for an immigration policy that puts American workers first and reduces legal immigration levels.

. . . we also have to face the reality that what’s hurting American workers — maybe more than anything else if you’re an unskilled worker in America — is a huge amount of immigration that’s going on in this country.

And I’m not just talking about illegal immigration. Yes, we’ve seen 12, 15 million illegal immigrants here who are competing in primarily unskilled jobs. But in the last 14 years since 2000, there’ve been more people who have come to this country legally than any 14-year period in American history, and that includes the Great Wave.”

— Rick Santorum

 “May God Smile on You Today.”

What is the Miracle of Seeds all about? Find out one man’s experience at http://tinyurl.com/needseed
The Battista Family:
We thank God for the Blessings we have; and the blessings we are receiving!
We thank God, for everything!

GoDaddy will build your business!

Build your list with free tools at FREE LEADS FOREVER  http://www.marinepowerteam.com

Are the Libs Starting to Get It? Help Black Americans Regain Exceptionalism-Vote for Ben Carson, MD

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval OfficeImage

AMAZING!!! The Cover of Liberal Newsweek Magazine:

Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about 0bama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about 0bama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by the liberal media….  (HOW ABOUT A “DO-OVER FOR THE 2012 ELECTION?)

I Too Have Become Disillusioned
By Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist – Opinion Writer)
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack 0bama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining 0bama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer;” a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as 0bama’s “spiritual mentor;” a real-life, actual terrorist who served as 0bama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. 0bama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberals to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were ‘a bit’ extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: 0bama was given a pass – held to a lower standard because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the 0bama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to 0bama. True, 0bama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, 0bama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, 0bama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time 0bama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about 0bama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)

And what about his character? 0bama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerless-ness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.

Let’s hear that one more time:

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.

ROB THE VOTE: Obama’s secret strategy for staying in power

 
Whistleblower Magazine AUGUST 2012 – ROB THE VOTE: Obama’s secret strategy for staying in power

The Obama administration is widely regarded as the most lawless in U.S. history. This much you already know.

Not enough votes to pass ObamaScare? Bribe senators. Don’t like the Defense of Marriage law? Refuse to defend it in court. Congress won’t pass the “Dream Act” granting amnesty to a million illegals? Do it yourself by executive fiat. Don’t want to defend America’s borders? Sue states that do. Don’t like congressional inquiries? Ignore their subpoenas.

Obama’s violations are so blatant and manifold that nine states have joined together to sue the federal government for its rampant lawlessness.

So, now comes election time – and guess what the Obama administration’s approach is to America’s most sacred and fundamental civic institution.

Right: Utter lawlessness. The actions and intentions of Team Obama, if distilled into words, would be this: To hell with “the law.” We’re using every means possible to retain power and establish a permanent progressive voting majority in this country.

Highlights of “ROB THE VOTE” include:

 

  • “The election fraud lobby” by Joseph Farah, on today’s vast network obsessed with winning “by any means necessary” 
  • “Rob the vote” by David Kupelian, on Obama’s little-known plans for winning a second term in the White House 
  • “Suppressing the military vote– again” by Art Moore, on how America’s soldiers are routinely denied the right the vote 
  • “Less than 5 percent of military voters ‘were able to cast an absentee ballot that counted’” 
  • “Surprise! Taxpayers still paying for ‘defunct’ criminal vote-fraud group”  
  • “Study: U.S. voter rolls include 2 million dead people” 
  • Obama readying ‘thousands of lawyers’for November election 
  • “The Democrats‘ election forgery racket” by Michelle Malkin 

Obama’s Hate the Military!

Another political stunt at the expense of America’s finest

Dear Fellow American,

Barack Obama’s presidential campaign has reached a new level of desperation. And the target of his manipulative election-year politicking is a familiar one: the American military.

If you haven’t already heard, Obama’s campaign has just filed a lawsuit in Ohio to restrict military voting. In Ohio, there is a law that allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to vote early. The Obama campaign is suing to strike down this part of the law, claiming that there is “no discernible rational basis” for why military members are allowed extra time to vote.

No discernible rational basis?

Only a president who possesses such little understanding of our country’s military operations and the time constraints that are placed on our servicemen and servicewomen would hold such a viewpoint.

Moreover, for the last three years, the Department of Defense has reported to the president and Congress that the top reason why military members do not vote is inadequate time to do so.

But I can’t say I’m surprised that our own commander-in-chief doesn’t understand the time constraints our military is under. (After all, this is the same president who has played more than 100 rounds of golf since his inauguration, meaning that he has spent more than four months of working time fine-tuning his backswing.)

And now Obama is teeing off on the American military once more, commanding his army of lawyers to swarm Ohio – perhaps the most pivotal swing state of the election – and target a voting demographic that leans conservative. Barack Obama needs the American military to not vote, so he has set out to make it as difficult as possible for them to do so.

Stand with Special Operations Speaks in its mission to remove Barack Obama from the White House this November and help fund its nationwide advertising campaign today.

As you know, Barack Obama’s lawsuit against military voting rights is just a continuation of his war on America’s finest. That is just one reason why Special Operations Speaks (SOS) is launching a nationwide advertising campaign to remove him from office.

But above all, SOS stands resolved to oust Barack Obama from the White House because his administration has cultured a failed operational security environment by providing the public with highly classified national-security information that compromises military operations and endangers the lives of those who carry them out – all for the sake of political gain.

Because Barack Obama can’t stand on a platform of policy success, he is campaigning for reelection by making himself appear as a “tough guy.”

As a 27-year Navy SEAL officer who served as Commanding Officer of the Naval Special Warfare Center (where our proud Navy SEALS train), allow me to speak on behalf of the men and women who defend America’s freedom:

You know, real tough guys don’t run around telling how tough they are, nor do they leak sensitive or classified information for political or personal gain! Let me tell you point-blank: Those White House sycophants are NOT tough guys; they are weasels who care only about another four years of employment under the worst president this country has ever had.

Barack Obama has already cut our defense budget so deeply that his own Secretary of Defense called it “devastating” to our national security. And as long as there is an election to win, he will further jeopardize our military’s safety by releasing highly sensitive information that makes him look like a tough guy. So I’m asking you now – please join SOS in exposing the full truth about Barack Obama’s continuing, deliberate release of top-secret security documents.

Stand with Special Operations Speaks in its mission to remove Barack Obama from the White House this November and help fund its nationwide advertising campaign today.

Special Operations Speaks is already working with key Senate and House leaders to demand full congressional hearings into the Obama intelligence leaks. And our nationwide media blitz – TV ads, radio ads, news releases and personal appearances throughout the country – will make sure the American people learn the full truth about Barack Obama’s war on America’s military.

I hope you’ll contribute to our nationwide truth-and-action campaign with whatever you can afford to give – whether it’s just $25 or $50, or as much as $100 or more.

America’s finest deserves better treatment than it has received from this president. Help SOS remove Barack Obama from the White House and replace him with someone who respects America’s military and the enduring sacrifice its servicemen and servicewomen make to our country.

Larry Bailey, CAPT (SEAL), USN (Ret.)

Obama”S”care will destroy The USA!

One thought before you start reading the following article:  President Obama continues to say we can’t go back to the policies of the past!  Why not?  If he means the policies that were in place before the democrats took over congress in January 2007, then he (and anyone that believes him),  is either a liar or a fool.  This will be the subject of a future blog, just keep in mind while the republicans had a measure of control in Congress and The White House we had $1.80 per gallon gasoline and unemployment rates hovering around 5%.
Once the democrats took over Congress in 2007 things started to fall apart.  With their willing allies in the press, the democrats have been able to keep the light from shinning on them, however the housing crisis and all of the other problems in the economy can be laid directly at the feet of the democrats. (That will be the subject of another future blog.)  Bush made a major error by not exposing this criminal behavior.  Meanwhile, the press makes it look like Bush and the republicans are at fault.  THAT IS NOT SO!  At least not all of their fault.  The republican guilt is that they stood by and watch this destruction and never gave those of us out here a warning!  It is impossible to believe they did not know the destructive actions the democrats were up too!  Chris Dodd and Barney Frank would have been in jail  if they were republicans. I hold the republicans guilty of allowing these two culprits to get away their crimes  and never doing anything to bring them to justice!
Now let’s take a closer look at the Affordable Care Act, and why I call it the Obama Scare Act. My comments will be brief and in italics separated by (xxx).

Subject: Important!!!!
Stop thinking like a Democrat or Republican and start thinking like an AMERICAN!!!
YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS…
At age 76 when you most need it, you are not eligible for cancer treatment!
What Nancy Pelosi didn’t want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed. Remember she said:

“We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In it!”

Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number
THE CARE BILL HB 3200JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL.
Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, TX – highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200
Please read this…….. especially the reference to pages 58 & 59
JUDGE KITHIL wrote: **
Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.
    (Remember Congressman Joe Wilson yelling out, “You Lie,” when the President said otherwise.  I guess it was a lie, or else Obama never knew what was in the bill.) (YOUR going to love this next bit of information):
Any individual not carrying insurance acceptable to the government will be taxed 2.5%…nonresident aliens (illegals) are EXEMPT from this tax.

** Pages 58 and 59-sections 21-24: The government will have real-time access to an individual’s bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.**  (Why? If this is free health care for the 30,000,000 that can’t afford it, why do they need access to your bank account?) (Page 58 says we will be issued a health card, could it be a national id card?) (I hope you don’t get lost in all of this legal-eze spread thoughout this 2,600 plus plus pages of freedom destruction.  Keep in Mind Romney Care is only 70 pages.)
THE HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION WILL HAVE ACCESS TO EVERY INDIVIDUALS PERSONAL AND FINANCIAL RECORDS.
Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now – ACORN). (Subsidized by the government means YOU THE TAXPAYER WILL BE PAYING FOR UNIONS MEMBERS, AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS AND THEIR ORGANIZATIONS.)

** Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)

** Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors’ fees.

**Page 29, section 4-16, Rationing: Your costs are limited to $5,000 per individual and $10,000 per family. (Couple pages 241, 253 and 29 and I wonder if any intelligent American will ever go into medicine again?) (My family far exceed the $10,000. How about you?  If you are young and in good health, that is great, but what about the older or younger infirm?) (Also in these pages it tells a doctor what kind of equipment he can buy to treat his patients, and tells hospitals if they can expand or not.)

** Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient’s age.

** Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.

** Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an “end-of-life planning” seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)

** Page 42, (The health choice commissar will choose your health care benefits.  You have no choice.)

** Page 22 (All books of the self-insured will be audited.)

** Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.

** Page 30 sect. 123 (A committee will decide your treatment…(Did someone say Death Panels?)

** Page 72, 8-14 (Exchanges will bring all insurance under government control.)

** Page 84:203  (Government will mandate all benefit packages in the exchange).

** Page 85:7     (Medicaid is automatic.  Everyone’s care will be rationed.)
HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on to identify:

“Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. Members of Congress claim they pay into  the Social Security system, but they fail to mention they have a well-funded private plan (from money supplied by the tax payer) that covers their retirement needs. If they had to rely on our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick ‘fix’ to make the plan financially sound for their future.”

Honorable David Kithil of Marble Falls, Texas
All of the above should give you the ammo you need to support your opposition to Obamacare. Please send this information on to all of your email contacts.
(Other tidbits to keep in mind: You cannot sue the government for price fixing; there are no judicial reviews of government monopolies; the government will now be inserted into your marriage: the government will now ration mental health care.
(Romney care is 70 pages.  It is clearly written and except for the imposed tax/penalty it does not have all of the freedom robbing provisions of the 2,600 plus pages of ObamaScare!  It is also Constitutional for a state to impose these kinds of rules and taxes.  It is not Constitutional for the federal government to do so, regardless what 5 educated-idiots in black robes say!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It will be your turn, or someone you care about, SOONER THAN YOU THINK…………..
frightening video here……………….
A doctor’s first fine will be $100,000 and his second offense is prison. I can’t imagine staying in the medical profession.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
PLEASE READ THIS WITH A OPEN MIND AS COMING FROM A PERSON THAT KNOWS THE CONTENTS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA
Wait until you read this…
A retired Constitutional lawyer has read the entire proposed healthcare bill. Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish.
The Truth About the Health Care Bills – Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney:
Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.
To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.
The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.
However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.
The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.
The irony is that the Congress doesn’t have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.
This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide…
If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However, that doesn’t work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.
So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law It doesn’t stop there though.
The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;
The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to theUnited States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.
I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights… Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to “be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution.” If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.
For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.
Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas
AFTER HAVING READ THIS, PLEASE FORWARD….
If you don’t care about our constitution, or your rights under it, just do nothing.
WE MUST HOLD CONGRESS ACCOUNTABLE BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE