Golf Hats for Democrats and a Message From an American Patriot Biker!



A) In other news… We all remember when KFC
offered a “Hillary” meal, consisting of 2
small breasts and 2 large thighs.
KFC now offers the “Obama Cabinet Bucket”
It consists of nothing but left wings and
chicken shit.

No thanks necessary; just keeping you up to
date, as this is my civic duty….
B)  By the way, this photo below was taken at a rally of the deceived democrats:
 Dem Rally for Obama
Click to reply all

Newtown had no murders in 2012! SAY WHAT!?!

Newtown 27,904 7 0 5 0 2 185 32 151 2 1

Sorry, the article was mashed when transferring it!  The categories are:

Population    Violent Crime   Murder & Manslaughter   Rape   Robbery

27,904                      7                            0                                 5                 0  

Assault   Property-crime   Burglary   Larceny

    2                   185                            32                   151                                                                                             

Motor             Arson
vehicle
theft             

    2                   1

 

Go to the FBI site and check it out if you won’t believe this blog!  Maybe you better run to get

it, before Obama cronies go and delete or change this report!

 Table 8 – Connecticut

Table 8

CONNECTICUT

Offenses Known to Law Enforcement

by City, 2012

City Population Violent
crime
Murder and
nonnegligent
manslaughter
Forcible
rape
Robbery Aggravated
assault
Larceny-
theft
Arson
Ansonia 19,271 29 0 4 15 10 455 80 317 58 1
Avon 18,162 5 0 2 2 1 169 25 143 1 0
Berlin 19,935 21 0 0 5 16 309 55 243 11 2
Bethel 18,822 6 0 3 2 1 321 48 263 10 2
Bloomfield 20,557 31 0 5 8 18 505 69 404 32 0
Branford 28,055 21 0 0 10 11 675 56 595 24 1
Bridgeport 146,030 1,760 22 388 606 744 5,153 1,377 2,908 868 25
Bristol 60,688 93 3 9 51 30 1,590 355 1,123 112 7
Brookfield 16,662 2 0 0 0 2 191 36 149 6 0
Canton 10,328 1 0 1 0 0 88 7 78 3 0
Cheshire 29,295 4 0 0 4 0 265 48 210 7 0
Clinton 13,326 27 0 16 3 8 302 53 241 8 1
Coventry 12,451 2 0 2 0 0 170 67 101 2 0
Cromwell 14,075 11 0 1 6 4 290 44 233 13 0
Danbury 81,891 109 1 23 45 40 1,562 287 1,201 74 6
Darien 20,998 2 0 0 1 1 99 13 85 1 0
Derby 12,917 28 1 8 10 9 397 92 271 34 2
East Hampton 13,024 5 1 1 1 2 148 34 109 5 0
East Hartford 51,431 192 2 26 83 81 1,573 362 1,029 182 11
East Haven 29,288 32 1 6 15 10 875 166 642 67 4
Easton 7,584 0 0 0 0 0 40 17 22 1 0
East Windsor 11,200 18 0 7 6 5 338 61 268 9 4
Enfield 44,806 30 0 0 12 18 820 198 591 31 5
Fairfield 60,122 33 0 2 13 18 1,301 231 1,000 70 1
Farmington 25,429 24 0 2 17 5 629 50 549 1
Glastonbury 34,547 22 0 3 9 10 326 55 258 13 1
Granby 11,321 2 0 0 1 1 96 5 91 0 0
Greenwich 61,948 23 0 2 6 15 368 45 301 22 4
Groton 10,397 17 0 4 3 10 157 8 139 10 3
Groton Long Point 518 0 0 0 0 0 14 3 9 2 0
Groton Town 29,231 48 0 8 8 32 610 72 515 23 6
Guilford 22,400 24 0 3 7 14 293 51 235 7 0
Hamden 61,032 322 2 3 39 278 1,382 196 1,089 97 2
Hartford 125,203 1,655 23 27 640 965 5,319 1,050 3,467 802 88
Madison 18,288 2 0 0 1 1 116 25 89 2 1
Manchester 58,444 111 1 12 46 52 1,797 288 1,417 92 7
Meriden 60,934 222 5 25 76 116 1,812 421 1,223 168 9
Middlebury 7,583 4 0 2 1 1 70 20 45 5 0
Middletown 47,878 72 1 1 25 45 900 156 661 83 3
Milford 52,817 46 0 2 33 11 1,586 150 1,371 65 4
Monroe 19,728 3 0 1 1 1 159 41 115 3 0
Naugatuck 31,896 30 0 7 11 12 632 92 498 42 2
New Britain 73,458 317 3 5 179 130 2,917 775 1,749 393 0
New Canaan 19,992 6 1 0 2 3 130 14 114 2 0
New Haven 129,934 1,870 17 55 844 954 6,516 1,451 4,351 714 15
Newington 30,668 28 1 8 14 5 784 99 636 49 4
New London 27,643 366 3 10 45 308 764 183 515 66 10
New Milford 28,047 21 0 9 1 11 363 4 335 24 1
Newtown
27,904 7 0 5 0 2 185 32 151 2 1
North Branford 14,422 5 1 1 1 2 201 34 160 7 0
North Haven 24,119 12 0 0 11 1 578 63 478 37 0
Norwalk 86,693 272 3 9 68 192 1,713 250 1,352 111 4
Norwich 40,517 99 1 18 35 45 963 274 639 50 15
Old Saybrook 10,293 9 0 0 0 9 162 7 152 3 0
Orange 13,971 7 0 2 5 0 376 33 332 11 4
Plainfield 15,410 14 0 3 5 6 121 36 72 13 1
Plainville 17,778 44 0 0 4 40 665 145 482 38 0
Plymouth 12,202 8 0 4 0 4 210 38 157 15 2
Portland 9,556 10 0 0 2 8 76 21 52 3 0
Putnam 9,588 29 0 6 3 20 200 51 142 7 3
Redding 9,275 0 0 0 0 0 59 8 47 4 0
Ridgefield 24,952 1 0 0 1 0 88 10 77 1 1
Rocky Hill 19,776 3 0 2 1 0 276 33 234 9 0
Seymour 16,558 10 0 2 2 6 161 45 106 10 1
Shelton 40,062 22 0 7 12 3 432 134 265 33 0
Simsbury 23,591 7 1 0 2 4 176 25 147 4 0
Southington 43,219 28 1 5 11 11 751 130 585 36 7
South Windsor 25,798 9 0 3 2 4 372 48 307 17 0
Stamford 124,201 351 5 25 145 176 1,932 290 1,472 170 10
Stonington 18,556 11 0 3 1 7 330 66 257 7 1
Stratford 52,041 104 0 15 28 61 1,413 245 1,070 98 9
Suffield 15,789 4 0 1 0 3 131 25 105 1 0
Thomaston 7,859 4 0 0 0 4 138 58 72 8 0
Torrington 36,264 51 0 18 11 22 842 111 711 20 4
Trumbull 36,474 14 0 0 11 3 531 52 449 30 0
Vernon 29,217 46 0 5 7 34 311 65 237 9 2
Wallingford 45,183 15 0 2 10 3 914 161 728 25 2
Waterbury 110,486 328 5 7 185 131 4,713 662 3,538 513 8
Waterford 19,529 45 1 0 6 38 515 55 451 9 0
Watertown 22,437 25 2 4 3 16 520 86 412 22 0
West Hartford 63,487 46 0 2 35 9 1,695 243 1,348 104 2
West Haven 55,626 319 1 1 58 259 1,447 197 1,076 174 1
Weston 10,309 3 0 0 0 3 41 11 30 0 0
Westport 26,728 11 0 0 2 9 318 40 271 7 0
Wethersfield 26,762 23 0 1 11 11 410 62 328 20 1
Willimantic 17,818 27 0 1 13 13 433 104 276 53 4
Wilton 18,291 2 1 0 0 1 93 17 75 1 0
Winchester 11,205 15 0 2 4 9 253 81 161 11 1
Windsor 29,145 15 0 4 7 4 429 55 361 13 0
Windsor Locks 12,541 10 0 2 4 4 225 49 166 10 0
Wolcott 16,697 6 0 1 5 0 318 78 226 14 0
Woodbridge 9,000 8 0 1 2 5 107 23 77 7 0

Data Declaration

Provides the methodology used in constructing this table and other pertinent information about this table.

 

 

Gun Owners Beware! Obama and The UN are After Your Guns!

  • The only thing an American has to fear is fear itself!

     Repubs aren’t so great, but a lot better than dems!
                                                                   The only thing an American has to fear is fear itself!

Most gun owners do not know that Obama put a “full-court press” on at the UN to pass the “anti-gun” treaty!  Meanwhile, he and his Chameleon cohorts act like gun  supporters, WHICH THEY ARE NOT! Their hope is to get SUCH Strong control of  the Senate that they can pass that treaty after the next election in 2014!

Any gun owner that votes for a demonrat or,  even a fairly decent democrat,  is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders!
The demonrats interpretation of an “Ordinary American” is so far from the truth, an idiot like Biden and gangstas like Barry and Holder, wouldn’t recognize a true American if Mr & Ms. America walked up to them with “The Flag,”  A “Bible” and a gun!

2nd Amendment Under Fire! Does Govt. want A Shooting War Against Gun Owners?

Our 2nd Amendment as well as our entire Constitution, is under attack by the muslim-marxists!  As you read the article from our friends at
Live Free in an Unfree WorldREALIZE THERE IS A LOT MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE HERE!
Obama is firing Generals that say they will not shoot at Americans.  The points brought up in  this article below,  follow an earlier GIGANTIC ammo purchase by DHS!  Why would they need such a large amount of Ammo, and ASSAULT VEHICLES? Pay heed!

Is Government Readying For A Shooting War Against Gun Owners?

March 18, 2013 by

Is Government Readying For A Shooting War Against Gun Owners?

PHOTOS.COM

Gun grabbing lawmakers at both the State and Federal level continue to push forward with their anti-American, anti-2nd Amendment, anti-gun agendas, even as more individuals, State legislatures and manufacturers of weapons, weapons accessories and ammunition push back. It almost seems as if the elected class is itching for a fight.

And when one considers that the Department of Homeland Security has contracted for 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition — much of it hollow points or for use in sniper rifles — for its 55,000 armed agents, plus 2,717 armored personnel carriers and 7,000 select fire “personal defense weapons,” it seems even more apparent that’s the goal. For perspective, 1.6 billion rounds is enough to fight the Iraq war for 20 years. It’s enough to shoot every American five times. It’s 28,000 tons, or the equivalent of three guided missile destroyers. It’s almost 30,000 target practice rounds per armed agent — but of course, because they are more expensive, hollow points are not used for target practice.

These purchases have long concerned many of those who pay attention. But only the alternative media talked about it — to derision and catcalls — until Feb. 15. That’s when The Denver Post ran an article by The Associated Press about the purchases. That prompted a column by Ralph Benko at Forbes.com in which he said it’s time for a national conversation about the purchases.

More than that, it’s time for a national conversation on the link between the purchases and the ongoing push by the elected class to collapse the economy and pass legislation against the will of the people.

Recall that Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), speaking for the state, informed us that, “One of the definitions of a nation state is that the state has a monopoly on legitimate violence. And the state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence.”

The Federal Assault Weapons Ban bill passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday on a partisan 10-8 vote. The bill’s primary sponsor, Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) — who has said she’d like to see all guns removed from the hands of Americans — knows “the road is uphill” for the legislation’s passage. If that’s the case, then why pass it if not just to poke in the eye a significant portion of the American population already upset over the anti-gun rhetoric and attacks on lawful gun owners by the gun grabbers?

But while the ban on so-called “assault weapons”  is more than likely to fail, it’s not unlikely that Republicans who want to go along to get along will glom on to legislation requiring universal background checks, which passed out of the Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. Universal background checks are the camel’s nose under the tent. As former Attorney General Janet Reno said in 1993 during discussions of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban (AWB): “Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal.” Remember that the elites are content with incremental steps that I call gradualism.

Remember also that gun control is not a partisan issue, although it appears so now and conventional wisdom says so. Prominent Republicans (including much of the field for the last GOP Presidential nomination), in a bid to appear “reasonable” to the establishment crowd, have supported various measures that restricted gun ownership. The last GOP standard-bearer, Mitt Romney, said he would have signed the 1994 AWB if it came to his desk. If he were President today, a gun bill would be more than likely to pass because he would provide cover for statist Republicans to go along with a gun ban — as George W. Bush provided cover for Republicans to support anti-liberty measures like expanding Medicare and passing No Child Left Behind and other government-growing legislation.

President Richard Nixon, in a taped conversation with aides, said: “I don’t know why any individual should have a right to have a revolver in his house. The kids usually kill themselves with it and so forth.” He asked why “can’t we go after handguns, period? I know the rifle association will be against it, the gun makers will be against it.” But “people should not have handguns.”

Even more insidious — and likely more harmful to gun rights — are the States that are passing anti-gun measures against the will of the people. New York rammed through legislation banning weapons and large-capacity magazines, violating its own procedures in the process. Since then, 52 of New York’s 62 counties have introduced legislation calling for the repeal of the New York State Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act. The legislation has passed in 40 of them. Colorado has passed bans on magazine capacity, and a bill that would require background checks is close to passage. Governor John Hickenlooper has said he will sign the bills despite threats by gun supply manufacturers to pull out of the State if he does.

Sheriffs, other law enforcement agents, some groups and many individuals are vowing to resist gun-confiscation efforts. Twenty-eight States have introduced or passed bills to preserve the 2nd Amendment. Fourteen have introduced or passed Firearms Freedom Acts.

Manufacturers of guns, gun accessories and ammunition have put their financial health on the line by refusing to sell to State and local governments that pass restrictions on gun ownership by individuals. That list is at 136 and growing.

And the Outdoor Channel, a popular cable channel for outdoors enthusiasts, hunters, fishermen and shooters, has told Colorado it will pull its production out of Colorado if gun control measures are signed into law.

If gun grabbers thought the Sandy Hook shooting would cause Americans to stand passively by and allow their 2nd Amendment rights to be snatched away, they have learned differently. The question now is: How far is government willing to go now that it’s getting push-back?

President John F. Kennedy once said, “Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life.”

It appears those people are stepping up.

For more information you can go to Amazon and look up books by John Lott, Stephen P Holbrook and Craig Whitney as well as many others:

Hitler in the Making! Obama removing all military leaders if they will not fire on U.S. citizens!

At the end of this article is a link to a “you tube video.” First, it shows a citizen putting a city councilman in his place. Then, a number of choices come up after that first video.  Click on the video choice regarding Obama telling military they might have to shoot on Americans.  Please, invest the 20 minutes or so for this vital information!

Shock claim: Obama removing all military leaders from command if they will not fire on U.S. citizens
Friday, January 25, 2013 by: J. D. Heye
(NaturalNews) It is not a claim being made by some obscure personality who hosts a late-night “radio show” on shortwave, or by a known far-out lunatic seeking his latest 15 minutes of fame, but by none other than a Nobel Peace Prize nominee.

Reports surfaced Jan. 22 that Dr. Jim Garrow, nominated for the prize in 2009, made a shocking claim on his Facebook page in recent days that he was informed by a top military vet that the Obama administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or not they will follow orders to fire on American citizens if need be.

Garrow, founder of The Pink Pagoda Girls, a group that seeks to rescue baby girls from the officially sanctioned “gendercide” in China, is no “kook.” He’s a public figure who has been involved in “helping rescue more than 36,000 Chinese baby girls from death,” according to the Pagoda website. That knowledge alone is what makes his claim all the more disturbing and worthy of attention.

‘Litmus test’ for future military commanders?

From his Facebook post:

“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not. Those who will not are being removed.”
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038827_military_leaders_US_citizens_Litmus_test.html#ixzz2J7lVJgYs
Later, he followed up the post by adding that the man who told him that is “one of America’s foremost military heroes” whose motivation for divulging the information was to “sound the alarm,” InfoWars.com reported.

Garrow’s news comes on the heels of other notable events currently taking place, including the “national debate” over the desire by the president and many on the political Left to impose sweeping new gun control laws – including the banning of certain military look-alike, semi-automatic rifles involved in the fewest amount of gun crimes, according to the FBI’s crime statistics.

The news also follows a report from the Washington Free Beacon that four-star Marine Gen. James Mattis, head of the United States Central Command, which oversees operations in the Middle East and more specifically; Afghanistan, was “given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of” CENTCOM “and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.”

‘Why the hurry?’

Veteran National Security reporter Thomas Ricks wrote on his blog that the firing could have been linked to Mattis’ refusal to toe the line on potential military action against Iran:

Why the hurry? Pentagon insiders say that he rubbed civilian officials the wrong way – not because he went all “mad dog,” which is his public image, and the view at the White House, but rather because he pushed the civilians so hard on considering the second- and third-order consequences of military action against Iran. Some of those questions apparently were uncomfortable.

But Ricks went on to say something much more revealing – and cryptic – about the Obama administration’s national security team:

I am at the point where I don’t trust his national security team. They strike me as politicized, defensive and narrow. These are people who will not recognize it when they screw up, and will treat as enemies anyone who tells them they are doing that. And that is how things like Vietnam get repeated. Harsh words, I know. But I am worried.

Security upgrades in the era of shrinking budgets

Further, InfoWars.com reminds us:

Concerns over U.S. troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of mass gun confiscation first arose in 1995 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.” The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone of the question.

Finally, there is this, more recent, development. Security at military bases around the country are being enhanced, and all at a time when military budgets on the state and federal levels are supposed to be shrinking. The upgrades are being blamed on the 2010 Fort Hood shooting, but the government’s narrative may give away its motives: “Nearly a year after a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, the Pentagon is taking new steps to beef up security and surveillance programs at its bases, and will join an FBI intelligence-sharing program aimed at identifying future terror threats,” The Associated Press reported.

We will be following these developments.

Richard Flewelling
11:34 AM (5 hours ago)

to bcc: me
In this forward, view the youtube link below. It is about an Oak Harbor, Washington City Council meeting where a citizen stood up and talked about educating children about firearms. Very interesting and some very valid points were made. I strongley urge you to view it.

On the same page of youtube that comes up is a list of other youtube postings. One is about Obama asking the Military if they would fire on American Citizens if ordered. This is a “Must Watch” video. It is about 20 minutes long and you will find it very, very interesting.

It is of my opinion that everyone in the country should view these two videos.
Richard

Subject: Oak Harbor, Washington city councilman handed his a$$ on a platter.

Subject: Oak Harbor, Washington city councilman walks out on council meeting because of citizen with CCW – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kKpLhNiC8zg#!

Sources:

http://www.infowars.com

http://freebeacon.com/report-obama-ousting-centcom-chief-mattis/

http://www.pinkpagodagirls.com/category/about-us/

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038827_military_leaders_US_citizens_Litmus_test.html#ixzz2J7knsUJJ

THINK THEY’RE AFTER WE PARANOIDS?! How to answer questions that don’t need to be asked!

Subject: How to answer questions that didn’t need to be asked:

Richard Flewelling's profile photoAn article sent by Richard Flewelling@gmail.com

Here is a heads up. Read the article below on gun possession and them come back and read below….some friendly advice.

A common Rule of Thumb….whenever a bureaucrat asks you a question, a safe “answer” is to ask them a question in return. Be polite, but be firm. They often want to extract information out of you without you being the wiser. There is no transparency in the manner of their interaction with you. A good example of this is in the article below….here is what I do. You do what you want.

Example: Did you know you were speeding back there ?
answer: Was I speeding ?
What is your name ?
Is there a problem officer ?
Where are you going ?
Is there a problem officer ?
Can I look in your trunk ?
Do you have a warrant ?

Why can’t I just answer the question and be safe? In law if you answer the question [ANY QUESTION], you have “joined the issue”, meaning that you have unwittingly become a part of the officer’s jurisdiction. To “join” means to become part of an alliance, or to enter into an alliance. You have constitutional protections to guard against such intrusions into your privacy. To be safe, just follow the simple Rule of Thumb. Disclaimer: This is not to be construed as legal advice. Do you own a gun ? Why do you need to know ? Keep it simple. Stop the intrusion into something they have no business asking.

The Patriot Act was passed by both Houses. dESPITE OBAMA AND OTHER DEMOCRAT OBJECTIONS TO IT, THEY RENEWED IT AND MADE IT EVEN WORSE THAN IT WAS! Don’t help them reduce your freedom.

In the article below, use your best judgment….or you might find yourself where you don’t want to be.
Another way of finding out our “PRIVACY”
Never answer the question….
Do you have a gun in the house ? Why do you need to know ?

GOOD TO KNOW !

When I had my gangrene gallbladder taken out and spent 10 days in the hospital for what should have been an overnight stay the insurance company kicked me out. I had home nurse visits for two weeks and was asked if I had guns in the house. I respond that if I did I would not tell them. So the below has some merit.

FYI, I am passing this along… there are comments from two other people I have also been asked if we keep guns in the house. The nurse just kinda slipped it in along with all the other regular questions. I told her I refused to answer because it was against the law to ask.

Everyone, whether you have guns or not, should give a neutral answer so they have no idea who does and who doesn’t. My doctor asked me if I had guns in my house and also if any were loaded. I, of course, answered yes to both questions. Then he asked why I kept a loaded gun close to my bed. I answered that my son, who is a certified gun instructor and also works for Homeland Security, advised me that an unloaded, locked up gun is no protection against criminal attack.

The Government now requires these questions be asked of people on Medicare, and probably everyone else.

Just passing this along for your information: I had to visit a doctor other than my regular doctor when my doctor was on vacation.. One of the questions on the form I had to fill out was: Do you have any guns in your house?? My answer was None of your damn business!!

So it is out there ! It is either an insurance issue or government intervention. Either way, it is out there and the second the government gets into your medical records (as they want to under Obamacare) it will become a major issue and will ultimately result in lock and load !!

Please pass this on to all the other retired guys and gun owners… Thanks, from a Vietnam Vet and retired Police Officer: I had a doctor’s appointment at the local VA clinic yesterday and found out something very interesting that I would like to pass along. While going through triage before seeing the doctor, I was asked at the end of the exam, three questions: 1. Did I feel stressed ? 2. Did I feel threatened ? 3. Did I feel like doing harm to someone ?
omeland Security.

Looks like they are going after the vets first. Other gun people like retired law enforcement will probably be next. Then when they go after the civilians, what argument will they have? Be forewarned and be aware. The Obama administration has gone on record as considering veterans and gun owners potential terrorists. Whether you are a gun owner, veteran or not, YOU’VE BEEN WARNED !

If you know veterans and gun owners, please pass this on to them. Be very cautious about what you say and to whom.

They are coming for us, so unless you’re an ostrich or a Democrat, do not stick your head in the sand……….

“Man is not free unless government is limited.” – Ronald Reagan