Obama’s Medical Insurance Simply Explained!

 Dear Reader:

The democrats claimed the purpose of The (un)Affordable Health Care Act often called ObamaScare, was to make sure every citizen had health insurance. In 2010 they claimed we had 30,000,000 uninsured people in the USA. Five years later The USA has 30,000,000 uninsured people. Co-pays are astronomically higher! Instead of premiums going down $2500 a year as President Obama promised they have gone up, and up and uuUP!  Suddenly, the people that used to come through our medical facilities have been replaced by an entirely different group. 

“This is EXACTLY what we are seeing with the throngs of frappers parading through Humana, for lo these endless months” stated a Humana employee.

The following synopsis of ObamaScare was written by an engineer.  A good engineer, wrote this. If a Lawyer had written it, we would be reading pg, 2000 by next week! You would have labored through at least 1000 “whereases” ” to-wits”, and as many  “party of the first parts”.

 Here is how you get to the core of this stupid piece of legislation in 4 simple sentences:

BRILLIANT

10,535 pages reduced to 4 sentences.

READ SLOWLY!

 4 simple sentences

Great summary by a Notre Dame University engineer………

As humorous as it sounds…..every last word is absolutely TRUE!

1. In order to insure the uninsured, we first have to un-insure the insured.
2. Next, we require the newly un-insured to be re-insured.
3. To  re-insure the newly un-insured, they are required to pay extra charges to be re-insured.
4. The extra charges are required so that the original insured, who became un-insured,
and then became re-insured, can pay enough extra so that the original un-insured can be insured, so it will be ‘free-of-charge’ to them.

 Back to the more verbose me:This, ladies and gentlemen, is called “redistribution of wealth” or, by its more common name, SOCIALISM, or “PROGRESSIVE”, the politically correct names for COMMUNISM !

Wow! What a brilliant way to raise money by the productive to fund a free service for the unproductive. Aren’t we lucky to have such a brilliant man as Barry Obama leading us!

Of course, there are government subsidies to help with the extra expenses.  You do realize that a government subsidy is when the government takes money away from the citizen, so the government can take a cut, giving what’s left over to the sick (that deserve help), those in temporary need (that deserve help) and the unproductive that don’t deserve anything!

DON’T FORGET, THERE IS NOT ONE REPUBLICAN FINGERPRINT ON THIS STUPIDITY! THE DEMOCRATS MIGHT WISH THE COULD BLAME THE OTHER PARTY, BUT THEY CANNOT! This proves my theory that the reason historians claim dems are better is because of the following sequence: Democrats make terrible messes of the economy.  The productive people realize it, switch to Republicans that then fix the mess.  Some of the fixes anger enough of the people that it swings the later election back to the Democrats. The dems ride a wave of good economics created by the repubs as they bring back their erroneous policies, messing things up again.  Slavery is a good example:

  It is only the past few decades that the American South has been trending Republican. Prior to that the South was solidly Democrat. From the founding throughout the civil rights fight the dems had a tight control in that part of the USA!  In fact, if it wasn’t for the Northern Republicans, LBJ would never have passed the Civil Rights legislation.  With that in mind, the slave states were controlled by Democrats.

 The Republican President Lincoln and his party in congress freed the slaves.  You could say they fixed the problem.  Then, with various swings in party control in Washington, the South stayed solidly democrat! The dems in the south created a “defacto slave state”, relegating black people to second class status.  It wasn’t until the Republican General Dwight Eisenhower integrated the military and later President Eisenhower integrated the public schools that the errors of the dems were once again corrected.  The same pattern happens over and over again! Especially economically!  How long will it take a Ben Carson, Ted Cruz or Don Trump to fix the many complex economic problems created by the democrats since they took over the countries purse in January 2007. That includes this health care mess!

We invite you to comment on this!

 Advertisement:

Get your free gold savings account! Find out how to earn free gold!  Go to http://abundantgoldmine.com

The Least Bigoted People I Know!

Ben Carson is too smart; my cousin David Mazzola lives as a monk offering constant love; my aunt Anne Mazzola walks with the saints!

TheFederalist

The Federalist RSS Feed Follow TheFederalist on Twitter Follow TheFederalist on Facebook Follow TheFederalist on Pinterest
It’s Not Bigoted To Judge Candidates On Their Faith

Politics
It’s Not Bigoted To Judge Candidates On Their Faith

The Constitution says no religious test shall be required for political office. Nowhere does it say voters should ignore a politician’s beliefs.
David Harsanyi
By David Harsanyi
September 22, 2015
If you’re a Seventh-day Adventist who believes it’s mankind’s duty to eradicate alcoholic beverages, or a Young Earther, or a Christian Scientist, or a member of any religious denomination that embraces Ludditism, or an orthodox Muslim who believes Sharia law is a preferable legal framework to secular governance, I probably wouldn’t vote for you no matter how compelling your tax plan sounded. But that’s just me.
It doesn’t mean I’d advocate that you be prohibited from running for office, or barred from proselytizing your faith, or have you thrown into an internment camp; it only means you are mistaken about some of life’s most significant questions.
This goes for candidates who are openly socialist, believe humans have the ability to control the weather, think astrology is real (even a little), wear bowties un-ironically, or adopt regional accents during stump speeches. In a world where the state has some say in nearly all of our decisions, your ideological disposition, your behavior, your choices, they all make a difference.
And few things impact your political outlook more than faith—whether it derives from Christ, Marx, or Ayn Rand. So yes, the Constitution says that no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. What it doesn’t say is that voters are prohibited from being critical of your illiberal, troglodytic, or silly notions about the world.
When Republican presidential candidate and (surprisingly) inarticulate retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson says, “I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation; I absolutely would not agree with that,” he designates all American Muslims—those who are most law-abiding, secularized, moderate, and fighting radicalism themselves—as members of a Fifth Column. Framed like this, it is both ugly and prejudicial. But is any concern over religious affiliation of a candidate tantamount to bigotry? Because if it is, we are a nation of haters.
A gay man avoids voting for the evangelical Christian who contends his favorite philosopher is Jesus Christ or the practicing Catholic who regards traditional marriage as sacrament. The media would never consider such a man a bigot. In fact, they would almost certainly comprehend his reluctance. If it were intolerant to take into account someone’s faith before casting a vote, then everyone who’s ever made fun of an evolution-denying Christian would be considered a chauvinist.
Way back when Slate’s Jacob Weisberg wrote a piece titled “Romney’s Religion: A Mormon president? No way” he wasn’t flaunting his hate. He was exploring the belief system of a presidential candidate, and he determined that the former Massachusetts governor’s outlook was incompatible with his own theories of sound leadership. When late-liberal film critic Roger Ebert wrote the essay “New Agers and Creationists Should Not Be President” he wasn’t unsheathing his inner xenophobia, he was arguing that certain belief systems were incompatible with his modern conception of political office.
After Carson’s comments, Glenn Greenwald, representing a strain of thought popular among the Left, posed this thought experiment:

The reaction would be predictable indignation. But it’s a misleading intellectual exercise. First off, black and gay Americans aren’t prepackaged with fixed philosophical viewpoints. You can be an African-American Muslim or a black lesbian into Swedenborgianism. Second, Judaism and Islam are not the same. Just like Zen Buddhism and Islam are not the same. Or Sufi and Shia Islam are not the same. They don’t have the same relationship with secular governance. And Jews—far more an ethno-cultural label than a theological one in the United States—are members of a faith that comports with liberal societies quite well. On the other hand, we have a comprehensive list of cases that test Islamic political control, and they are less comforting. Not everywhere. Not always. But often enough.
Of course, there is the enduring claim that Christianity is no more ethically sound or preferable than any other faith. Worse, even. Here is Ta-Nehisi Coates in the The Atlantic, offering us a Chomsky word cloud:

Ben Carson is a Christian—a fact he shares in common with all our greatest domestic terrorists and self-styled Indian-killers. From slave-holding to ethnic cleansing, Christianity has repeatedly been employed to sanctify our most shameful acts. One might counter that Christianity has also been employed to inspire our most honorable acts. But this is a level of complexity that Carson’s ilk do not grant to Islam. To Carson, Islam is terror and nothing else.
This is reminiscent of the president’s allusions to the Crusades when speaking about American concerns regarding Islam. Conflating the past with the present to create moral equivalency is nothing new. But it would be worth mentioning that there are Muslims in the world who are also guilty of being self-styled Indian-killers and “slave trading and ethnic cleansing”—but in twenty-first-century Asia.
No one is innocent, of course. Humans are imperfect, sometimes evil. Christians, Jews, and so on. Some societies get better. Some allow debates over reparations for past sins, other continue in sin. But are we going to pretend that there’s no practical or moral difference between the roles Christianity and Islam play in contemporary society? I practice neither, but prefer the outcomes of one vastly over the realities of the other. You do, too, I imagine, whether you’re Amish or even if you’re a secular atheist who sports a Coexist bumper sticker.
We all discriminate. The only difference is that in the progressive mindset, only some are to be punished for it.

Photo Shutterstock

David Harsanyi is a Senior Editor at The Federalist. Follow him on Twitter.

Republican Blood is Running in the Streets!

The sneaky AMBUSH by Fox, lead by meg, was 1000 times more vile than Trump’s comment!  In 2 hours THURSDAY I went from loving Megyn Kelly to hating “hateful meg”   OUR HOUSE WILL NEVER WATCH FOX WHEN ANY OF THE THREE BUSHWACKERS ARE ON.

TRUMP WAS NEVER MY FIRST CHOICE, but as long as these slime-balls keep attacking him, he keeps moving up in my book! Also, Red State is off the list of reliable information sources!

PEOPLE, A BUSH WILL NEVER WIN A RACE IN THIS DECADE!  THIS EFFORT IS TO HELP BUSH!  IF THEY WANT HIM SO BADLY, HAVE HIM RUN AS HILLBILLY CLINTON’S RUNNING MATE!  REMEMBER THE BUSH FAMILY SAYS CLINTON IS A BROTHER FROM ANOTHER MOTHER.  Ever since January 2007 it has been obvious there is a Clinton hiding behind every Bush!   If we get Jeb, we have Hilly!  If we get Hilly, we have Jeb!

There are only four people to consider as the Republican nominee: Ben Carson, MD; Ted Cruz; Trump and Carly Fiorina. I’m not 100% sure of Carly, yet!  She has all the words down pat, but so didn’t Obama!  Slogans for each: I’M RUNNING FOR BEN!  I’M CRUIS’N WITH CRUZ! WE’LL TRIUMPH WITH TRUMP! WATCHING WITH CARLY!

Why Dr Ben?  He knows how to solve problems.  He figured out how to separate Siamese Twins attached at the brain by God, and have both of them live normal lives!  He figured out how to fix the brain of an infant, inside God’s protective womb of the mother.  If he can figure out those problems he can figure out how to fix the problems created by politicians with half a brain!

Why Cruz? People voted for Obama because he was the Affirmative Action head of a Harvard student newspaper (where he never published an article)! We know nothing about his grades as a student! In fact we really know very little about him at all! Ted Cruz graduated at the top of his class at Harvard!  Ted Cruz is courageous! He stands up to the career politicians that run the Repugnant party! He also stands up to the Demonrats!  He was accused of hurting Republican chances in the election of 2014 due to his efforts to stand up for the American citizen, middle-class worker– instead, because he is one of the few Republicans to stand up for American workers (while no Democrat does) he helped repubs win control of the Senate and keep the House of Representatives!

TRUMP IS TRUMP!  Maybe it is time to get a Brash, No-holds-barred kind of problem solver in the government!  We will always know what is going on and where everything stands with Donald Trump in Washington!

Carly Fiorina, a new star on the scene.  I like her, now, but believe she needs to be studied a little more!  She certainly has all the right phrases.  People, let’s not be deceived again! Obama had the same ability to spew the things the electorate wanted to hear! He was smooth, neat and spoke with a silver tongue.  50% of America is deceived by these traits.  Let’s wake up and watch all the candidates before we jump on the band-wagon!

Yes, I like a handful of others, but like Trump, “‘if we can’t respect the eventual nominee of the Republicans, if he is out of the Repugnant camp,” I will have to support a third party candidate!!!

Advice for the Democrat Party: Jim Webb is the only one I would consider as a candidate!

The Greatest Thinkers Knew Gold Is Real, Paper isn’t worth the paper it is printed on!

Thomas Jefferson (portrait by Rembrandt Peale)

What if the gold standard is not an antique but, rather, a “timeless classic” (as termed in a speech by Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann in September 2012)?  High tech guru George Gilder deploys cutting-edge science to show why this is so, based on Shannon information theory. Gilder’s analysis is neither eccentric nor anomalous.

The intellectual pedigree of the classical gold standard runs through two of the greatest scientists in history: Copernicus and Newton. Nicolas Copernicus, in his Essay on the Minting of Money eloquently lays out the scientific foundations of the classical gold standard. (Full disclosure, I served as co-editor of a modern translation, by classicist Gerald Malsbary, published by Laissez Faire Books and recently republished by Cognella as part of a splendid compilation of source documents in classical economics in The Monetary Foundations of the Macroeconomy Volume 1 edited by Thomas Rustici, James Caton, Dima Shamoun, and Ted Shamoun).

Sir Isaac Newton, as Master of the Royal Mint of Great Britain, created what became the modern classical gold standard. This was a fact well known by President Jefferson, as astutely noted by Dr. Judy Shelton in erudite commentary to her definitive edition of Jefferson’s Notes on the Establishment of A Monetary Unit. Under the Newtonian gold standard, with variants, the world economy thrived for almost 200 years.

The gold standard also was one of the few things that both Jefferson, and his arch-rival in Washington’s cabinet, Alexander Hamilton, fully agreed. The gold standard’s intellectual provenance, both in deep scientific history and among the founders of America, really is impeccable.

BUILD YOUR GOLD SAFETY NET AT abundantgoldmine.com

Copernicus and Newton, of course, are figures from the deep past. Jefferson, slightly more contemporary, was extolled by President Kennedy at a dinner honoring Nobel Prize winners when he greeted them as “the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together at the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”

Copernicus and Newton, timeless classics, remain appropriately revered as two of the greatest members of the scientific pantheon. Their discoveries — Heliocentricity, and the Three Laws of Motion — remain central to science. Old does not equal atavistic.  Now let’s get modern.

It is less paradoxical than might superficially appear that George Gilder comes forward to exalt the scientific foundations of the classical gold standard. Gilder does so by drawing deeply upon modern Shannon information theory, work foundational to the high tech revolution very much alive and well.

So, a leading high-tech public intellectual attests to the ultra-modernity of the gold standard. Gilder, also known as the living author most quoted by President Reagan, went on to high tech iconic thought leader status as the author of Microcosm, Telecosm, The Silicon Eye, and Knowledge and Power among other highly-regarded works.

Gilder now presents a brilliant monograph, The 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money. In it he explores at greater depth some of the thoughts he first broached in a key chapter of his influential Knowledge and Power. The 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money was commissioned by the American Principles Project (whose sister organization I professionally advise).  He therein explodes the pernicious myth of the gold standard as an atavism.

In 106 lucid pages, Gilder magisterially demystifies money. A very few choice excerpts:

The economy is not fundamentally an incentive system, it is an information system. Manipulating money cannot create growth, and it distorts the information economic actors need to acquire the learning that alone is wealth-creation.

Growth in wealth stems . . . from the progress of learning. It is accomplished by entrepreneurs conducting falsifiable experiments of enterprise, with the outcomes measurable by reliable money.”

Claude Shannon “resolved that all information is most essentially surprise. Unless messages are unexpected, they do not convey new information.” But “[i]f a carrier is to bear surprising contents, it must itself be unsurprising.” That is what makes it possible to distinguish the signal from the noise.

In economics money is part of the conduit or carrier. If money is to foster learning and knowledge, it cannot itself be surprising. . . . money must be the measure, rather than what is measured.”

Gilder is unusual, but not unique, among tech leaders in his regard for gold. No less than Peter Thiel in an interview observed:

If you really wanted to create an alternate currency, it would have to be gold-based,” he says. “There are enough people who already believe in gold that you could probably get it to the tipping point. Starting completely from scratch is a lot harder to do. I have a lot more thoughts, but I’d say—you probably want to go with gold.”

     GET YOUR GOLD AT  http://abundantgoldmine.com   or call 928-925-8506

In the hands of Copernicus, Newton, and Shannon as channeled by Gilder, money becomes simple and intuitive.  Gilder gives us the real thing: science. In The 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money, George Gilder, true to his title, lays out a compelling 21st century case for the gold standard. Gilder reveals anew the gold standard’s deep scientific foundation. Buy a copy on old fashioned paper in better bookstores everywhere or download it and read it.

Delight in a very modern, scientific, demystification of money and discussion of why the classical gold standard repeatedly has proved itself beneficial.   With The 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money George Gilder well may have delivered his next game changer.

 

Originating at Forbes.com
Read more at http://affluentinvestor.com/2015/07/copernicus-newton-jefferson-hamilton-and-gilder-on-the-gold-standard/#XGRL9DamRmxxRvA3.99

As ISIS runs rampant an increasingly popular George W. Bush is vindicated

I liked “W” because he wasn’t the smooth co-artist like most politicians. Unfortunately, his brother Jeb appears to be what I don’t like about politicians.  My choice among the RepublICANs is Dr. Ben Carson.  Most don’t give him a chance, but you can believe he is the best of the lot!

As ISIS runs rampant an increasingly popular George W. Bush is vindicated

Former President George W. Bush has been enjoying something of a revival in recent months. First there came the news that Bush polls better than the man who replaced him, Barack Obama. Friday, Gallup reported that fewer people than ever view the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as mistakes. No wonder, as Hot Air reported, when Bush opined that we need boots on the ground to settle with ISIS, heads all over the planet nodded silently in agreement. After all, boots on the ground were what finally won the Iraq War during the surge, a victory that President Obama so casually threw away with both hands.

 President George W. Bush

Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images

Of course, all the boots on the ground don’t have to be American. The Kurds and certain of the Sunni tribesmen who have not yet been irrevocably alienated by Obama are certainly willing to fight. Given arms and support, they would do so with alacrity. It is not outside the realm of possibility that, also given arms and support, Jordanian and Egyptian troops could add muscle to an anti-Isis coalition. Throw in some American special operators and lots of air power and the days of the Islamic State would be numbered. If Bush were to, by some miracle, become president again, they would be.

We have an inkling that Bush was not as despised as the media would have us believe several years ago when those “Miss Me Yet?” posters started to show up with the former president’s smiling visage. Many predicted that Bush, who left office under a cloud, would in short order become a modern day Truman, only fully appreciated when time and the incompetence of his successor highlighted how good the country had it when he was in charge. That development has come true.

The man made happiest by this development, besides George Bush, is his younger brother Jeb, who also wants to become president. The Bush name may not be as much as a burden as many have thought.

VOTE BEN CARSON, 2016!!

Jeb might be a nice person, but he is also just another politician!  Ben Carson, is a genius of a man, and can undo all of the crap Obama is leaving behind-especially the degeneration of race relations in the USA! Ben is not another smooth talking, run of the mill politicians!  If you haven’t done so yet, check him out and you will see that he is the best choice.

Hillary Dickory Duck, She wants All Men Her “Cuck!” (Cuckold – a sexually abused man)!

Time to ignore the “liar in chief” and start to look at his possible successor!
The only question that remains about the Obama presidency is, ” how can 40% of the public be so blind as to still trust this conman?”  Maybe this article from an Eastern European Newspaper can explain it.

How come people in foreign lands have a better grasp on what is occurring in our country than most of our own people? I know this has been around before, but it is so well said that it deserves another trip through cyberspace.

From Prague, The Perfect Quote:

Occasionally people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way that can be quickly understood; this quote – from the Czech Republic.

It was translated into English from an article in the Prague newspaper, Prager Zeitungon

“The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.

It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president.”

Today at 8:15 AM
From: Daniel Johns

hillarygate620x620

First of all I want to apologize for the language in the below message,and I hope somehow this might go viral, as the World needs to know what kind of a vile person wants to lead our Country.

THE NEXT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HER OWN WORDS!
Warning! These are her actual words and quite disgusting! It is not Nice language but these are her actual words.

” Where is the Goddamn fucking flag! I want the Goddamn fucking flag up every morning at fucking sunrise.”

From the book Inside the White House by Ronald Kessler, p.244- Hillary to staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day 1991.

” Fuck off! It’s enough I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your Goddamn job and keep your mouth shut.”

-From the book “America Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p.90-Hillary to her State Trooper body guards after one of them greeted her with Good Morning

” If you want to remain on this detail, get your fucking ass over here and grab those bags!”

From the book “The First Partner” p.259- Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.

“Stay the fuck back, stay the fuck back away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else! Just fucking do as I say, Okay!!?”

-From the book “Unlimited Access” by Clinton FBI Agent in Charge, Gary Aldrige, p.139- Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail.

“Where’s the miserable cock sucker!”

-From the book “The Truth About Hillary” by Edward Klein, p.5- Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer.

” You fucking idiot! ”

From the book Crossfire p.84-Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event.

“Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those sunglasses. We need to go back!”
(AFTER ALL IT IS THE STUPID TAX PAYER THAT WILL PICK UP THE
EXTRA $3,000 COST! SHE NEEDS HER $100 SUNGLASSES.)

From the book “Dereliction of Duty” p.71-72– Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while en route to Air Force One.

“Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can’t fuck her here!!”

From the book “Inside the White House” by Ronald Kessler, p.243-Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female.

This ill-tempered, violent, loud mouth, hateful and abusive woman wants to be your next president and have total control as commander and chief of our Military, the very Military for which she has shown incredible disdain throughout her public life.

Surely the people of the United States can easily do better than this.

by Ed Schriber, Col. USMC

Picture Benghazi poem                                

Old, old Hillary Clinton! How she looks without makeup!

 

For this reason we need to have Ben Carson, MD run for the presidency in 2016.  Ben Carson is a soft-spoken, black man of character and  proven ability!  Our inexperienced Community Organizer president doesn’t come close to the class Dr Ben Carson exhibits in everything he says and does!