The case against reelection
Krauthammer writes a politics column that runs on Fridays.
What program? Obama laid it out boldly in a series of major addresses during the first months of his presidency. The roots of the nation’s crisis, he declared, were systemic. Fundamental change was required. He had come to deliver it. Hence his signature legislation:
First, the $831 billion stimulus that was going to “reinvest” in America and bring unemployment below 6 percent. We know about the unemployment. And the investment? Obama loves to cite great federal projects such as the Hoover Dam and the interstate highway system. Fine. Name one thing of any note created by Obama’s Niagara of borrowed money. A modernized electric grid? Ports dredged to receive the larger ships soon to traverse a widened Panama Canal? Nothing of the sort. Solyndra, anyone?
Second, radical reform of health care that would reduce its ruinously accelerating cost: “Put simply,” he said, “our health-care problem is our deficit problem” — a financial hemorrhage drowning us in debt.
Except that Obamacare adds to spending. The Congressional Budget Office reports that Obamacare will incur $1.68 trillion of new expenditures in its first decade. To say nothing of the price of the uncertainty introduced by an impossibly complex remaking of one-sixth of the economy — discouraging hiring and expansion as trillions of investable private-sector dollars remain sidelined.
The third part of Obama’s promised transformation was energy. His cap-and-trade federal takeover was rejected by his own Democratic Senate. So the war on fossil fuels has been conducted unilaterally by bureaucratic fiat. Regulations that will kill coal. A no-brainer pipeline (Keystone) rejected lest Canadian oil sands be burned. (China will burn them instead.) A drilling moratorium in the Gulf of Mexico that a federal judge severely criticized as illegal.
That was the program — now so unpopular that Obama barely mentions it. Obamacare got exactly two lines in this year’s State of the Union address. Seen any ads touting the stimulus? The drilling moratorium? Keystone?
Ideas matter. The 2010 election, the most ideological since 1980, saw the voters resoundingly reject a Democratic Party that was relentlessly expanding the power, spending, scope and reach of government.
It’s worse now. Those who have struggled to create a family business, a corner restaurant, a medical practice won’t take kindly to being told that their success is a result of government-built roads and bridges.
In 1988, Michael Dukakis famously said, “This election is not about ideology; it’s about competence.” He lost. If Republicans want to win, Obama’s deeply revealing, teleprompter-free you-didn’t-build-that confession of faith needs to be hung around his neck until Election Day. The third consecutive summer-of-recovery-that-never-came is attributable not just to Obama being in over his head but, even more important, to what’s in his head: a government-centered vision of the economy and society, and the policies that flow from it.
Four years of that and this is what you get.
Make the case and you win the White House.
Even Obama knows doesn’t have a real reason to get reelected. If he did such a bangup job creating jobs and getting the economy back on track why aren’t those his talking points? The answer…. everyone knows that his record on the economy and jobs are beyond terrible. Instead after four years he blames about every thing from Bush to the weather about why the economy is still in the ditch.
What is path to victory? Hey… this guy Romney would bollocks things up worse that I have. Not a great reason to vote for some one. Those on the left are going to find some excuse to vote for Obama because…… well they are leftest… Anyway you cut it Charles is correct. Obama has no economic/job creation creditionals to run on and its not going to get better before the election rolls around the first week in November.
Some important facts you liberals seem not to remember.
The Democrats controlled everything for the first two years Obama was in office. And the dems could have done anything they wanted about jobs and the economy. The Republicans could not left a finger to stop them. What did Barack Obama do? Drive the deficit up by almost 6 trillion dollars and come up with a crazy health care plan most Americans hate and will really hate once they find out health care for most Americans will be worse than it is now, as well as more expensive. Of course there is his job record: record length of high unemployment; record poverty, record child poverty, record deficits, a workforce that has actually shrunk since he took office. If the workforce was the same size today as it was when B O took office the unemployment rate would be over 11%. If you look at the U-6 unemployment number (broadest measure of unemployment) from the Labor Department it went to 15% in July. Lets see…. where were we…. Oh yes…. a reduction in wealth of over $4,000 per family, record number of home foreclosures, record number of bankruptcies (personal and business), on and on we could go.
So, if you cannot see why a vote for Obama is committing national suicide, you must be an Obama Kool-Aid drinker. I suppose there is another category of voter for BO, and that is the ignorant! You may be very intelligent, but if you are ignorant of the facts outlined above, you may still want to vote for the guy! Now, if you read this, you are no longer ignorant of the pertinent facts, so vote for anyone but Barack Hussein Obama. I am enthusiastic for Romney!
Click on the link below to get FREE Reports on How to Improve Your Life and Abilities to get What You Want!